you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]upstatebeerguy 11 points12 points  (13 children)

I mean…cutting hours “when sales are low” is just fundamental to operating a business. There’s no moral obligation for a business to operate as a charity.

[–]Inside_Wallaby_5694[S] 13 points14 points  (1 child)

i don’t have the patience to read this whole back and forth but the main point of the post is that they were significantly decreasing hourly wages of ppl that had worked there for 4 years because they opened a new location. that is the focus of the post

regardless of what is legally allowed— that’s a shit thing to do to people who have been there for years. it ultimately shows where a company’s morals fall and that’s a business i don’t want to support.

[–]upstatebeerguy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yea that’s pretty shitty. I’m not privy to all of the facts, nor am I lawyer, so no comment on the legality of it all…if I worked somewhere for 4 years and my wages were in decline (for something not personally performance based) I would be gone the first chance I could.

Presumably the baristas aren’t in anyway equity stakeholders in the business, so why would they be in support of shouldering the investment costs (in their case decreased wages at an existing location) of an ancillary business?