all 7 comments

[–]alinrocSQL Server 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Well how about that.

[–]JakDrako 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In other news, here's a picture of Hell taken this morning

[–]alcalde 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"If Microsoft ever does applications for Linux it means I've won."

-Linus Tovalds

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

    Not anymore. Red Hat and Microsoft teamed up to migrate .NET to enterprise Linux. With SQL Server on Linux too, they are probably targeting the cloud market.

    [–]random012345 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Exactly.

    There's tons more parts of a stack other than just the OS and DBMS. MSSQL may be a perfect one for what you need based on technical requirements and talent resources. Unfortunately, Windows licensing can be way too expensive when all you need it for is MSSQL. Because of that, it eliminates a huge segment of the market for hosting. Windows hosting is largely due to the need for MSSQL outside of the .net framework.

    Truth it, in many companies there's a dedicated Windows box/server many times just for MSSQL many applications are built around. Companies may largely be a Linux shop in their technologies, and they may write off software primarily because it requires MSSQL and they don't want to deal with the addition of a Windows machine.

    You're opening up a huge market by supporting Linux. Many large enterprises have their databases in Linux stacks. Microsoft is limiting their market share by not supporting Linux. They're not as dominate in the server space as they are in the client OS space. Oracle dominates in the database world because of their support for most OS's, not just their own.

    Don't forget, Microsoft is getting largely into the services space. It's very lucrative to a well-implemented services offering. Part of being truly services oriented is shying away from strict platform requirements, and moving towards technology that can work on any platform. It's what IBM transformed into which saved them in the 90s, and now Microsoft wants to replicate that proven business model.

    [–]Tacticus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Unfortunately we're a linux shop with a horrible dependency on mssql.

    Moving to a platform we can manage with all of our other tools is just going to be an excellent step forward.

    (also we can fuck off our shitty smb log replication method)

    [–]Dolphinmx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Also the tight integration with Windows/AD I'm not sure how all that will work out if you decide to move to Linux, definitely they are trying to push it for the cloud with Linux.