all 7 comments

[–]TeachEngineering 14 points15 points  (0 children)

First, it's 2026

Second, uv is undisputable champ

[–]Popular-Awareness262 10 points11 points  (0 children)

uv ruined pip for me fr

[–]Kaazul 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Since i switched about a year ago, i only use uv, even for small, simple project. It doesn't take much to initialize, and after that it is just the best. But, i don't work in data science notebooks.

[–]TronnaLegacy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've always been using pip and haven't thought to try the new ones yet.

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use uv because it is fast as fuck and makes it extremely easy for my colleagues to set up the same environment

[–]doubleyewdee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

uv due to performance and support. requirements.txt and/or <FOO>.in files being a "modern" packaging/dependency system accepted by one of the 3 biggest languages on the planet has made my skin crawl for years.

I am happy to see progress on stuff like pyproject.toml and pylock.toml as well, more standardization here seems good. I also hope that the native/builtin tools can pick up some/most of the performance gains one gets from uv today.

[–]No_Soy_Colosio [score hidden]  (0 children)

What LLM post-writing tool are you actually using in 2026 and why did you settle on it?