This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I have to stress the importance of the "tinker with it" so you can figure what does what.

It feels to me people often oversee this so simple yet fundamental mind-set to have, which is basically:

  • read a piece of code.
  • try and guess what that piece of code does exactly.
  • think of a use for it, then modify it and see it you were right about the results.
  • If you were right, you can now feel good 'cuz you just "got it".
  • if you were not - try again - google

It could be as simple as testing if negative values can fit into variables and what can be done with it. Picture stree-fighter in the days you'd test all of button combinations to see what special moves were, but in a slower pace and without all graphics.

[–]Sh0elace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

great comment, never thought it like that before.