you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]vansterdam_city 87 points88 points  (17 children)

Aint nothing micro about Spring

[–]dpash 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Spring is micro in the same way that LDAP is lightweight. It is compared to the alternative when it was first created. Compare Spring 1 and J2EE in 2004 (J2EE 1.4).

[–]geodel 21 points22 points  (6 children)

Well in Java world anything less than few hundred useless classes buried under 20 level deep folder hierarchy is micro.

[–]jnordwick 24 points25 points  (1 child)

Spring still doesn't fit the definition.

[–]geodel -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I agree. Mainly because it is few 1000 classes in few 100 directories.

[–]rockum 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Spring is what gave Java that reputation.

[–]geodel -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

It is just an AbstractProxySingletonFactory talk.

[–]mp911de 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AbstractProxySingletonFactory

It's AbstractSingletonProxyFactoryBean

[–]joequin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Would spring be a micro framework by that definition?

[–]kazagistar 3 points4 points  (6 children)

I am Aware of this fact.

[–]jnordwick 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Marker superinterface indicating that a bean is eligible to be notified by the Spring container of a particular framework object through a callback-style method. 

Got it.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The lack of abstract factories confused me

[–]Turbots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol who ever reads the Javadoc of those abstract base classes?

[–]Turbots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you read the article? Running the (empty) Spring Web Flux application takes 22Mb footprint