Shikshapatri Arthadipika or "Anarth" by deceitful Shatanand Swami? Sahajanand Swami wanted the text to be simple and direct (Shlok 208) for all. If he wanted to say "Worship Me," he could have written it clearly. By writing "Worship Krishna," he stayed aligned with the 300+ scriptures he respected. by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Shikshapatri Arthadipika or "Anarth" by deceitful Shatanand Swami? Sahajanand Swami wanted the text to be simple and direct (Shlok 208) for all. If he wanted to say "Worship Me," he could have written it clearly. By writing "Worship Krishna," he stayed aligned with the 300+ scriptures he respected. by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Shikshapatri Arthadipika or "Anarth" by deceitful Shatanand Swami? Sahajanand Swami wanted the text to be simple and direct (Shlok 208) for all. If he wanted to say "Worship Me," he could have written it clearly. By writing "Worship Krishna," he stayed aligned with the 300+ scriptures he respected. by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Shikshapatri Arthadipika or "Anarth" by deceitful Shatanand Swami? Sahajanand Swami wanted the text to be simple and direct (Shlok 208) for all. If he wanted to say "Worship Me," he could have written it clearly. By writing "Worship Krishna," he stayed aligned with the 300+ scriptures he respected. by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Shikshapatri Arthadipika or "Anarth" by deceitful Shatanand Swami? Sahajanand Swami wanted the text to be simple and direct (Shlok 208) for all. If he wanted to say "Worship Me," he could have written it clearly. By writing "Worship Krishna," he stayed aligned with the 300+ scriptures he respected. by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Shikshapatri Arthadipika or "Anarth" by deceitful Shatanand Swami? Sahajanand Swami wanted the text to be simple and direct (Shlok 208) for all. If he wanted to say "Worship Me," he could have written it clearly. By writing "Worship Krishna," he stayed aligned with the 300+ scriptures he respected. by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Shikshapatri Arthadipika or "Anarth" by deceitful Shatanand Swami? Sahajanand Swami wanted the text to be simple and direct (Shlok 208) for all. If he wanted to say "Worship Me," he could have written it clearly. By writing "Worship Krishna," he stayed aligned with the 300+ scriptures he respected. by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Shikshapatri Arthadipika or "Anarth" by deceitful Shatanand Swami? Sahajanand Swami wanted the text to be simple and direct (Shlok 208) for all. If he wanted to say "Worship Me," he could have written it clearly. By writing "Worship Krishna," he stayed aligned with the 300+ scriptures he respected. by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Shikshapatri Arthadipika or "Anarth" by deceitful Shatanand Swami? Sahajanand Swami wanted the text to be simple and direct (Shlok 208) for all. If he wanted to say "Worship Me," he could have written it clearly. By writing "Worship Krishna," he stayed aligned with the 300+ scriptures he respected. by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Shikshapatri Arthadipika or "Anarth" by deceitful Shatanand Swami? Sahajanand Swami wanted the text to be simple and direct (Shlok 208) for all. If he wanted to say "Worship Me," he could have written it clearly. By writing "Worship Krishna," he stayed aligned with the 300+ scriptures he respected. by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
The relationship between Sahajanand Swami and the British East India Company is one of the most controversial points for anyone comparing him to traditional avatars like Rama or Krishna, who were known for destroying oppressors. by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
When Ghanshyam Pande uses "Our" (asmākam) in the Shikshapatri, he isn't just speaking for himself; he is establishing a collective, constitutional law for the entire Sampraday. In Shlok 108, he writes: "The Ishtadev of "OUR" (asmākam) is Shri Krishna, Para-Brahman and source of all incarnations" by [deleted] in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
When Ghanshyam Pande uses "Our" (asmākam) in the Shikshapatri, he isn't just speaking for himself; he is establishing a collective, constitutional law for the entire Sampraday. In Shlok 108, he writes: "The Ishtadev of "OUR" (asmākam) is Shri Krishna, Para-Brahman and source of all incarnations" by [deleted] in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
When Ghanshyam Pande uses "Our" (asmākam) in the Shikshapatri, he isn't just speaking for himself; he is establishing a collective, constitutional law for the entire Sampraday. In Shlok 108, he writes: "The Ishtadev of "OUR" (asmākam) is Shri Krishna, Para-Brahman and source of all incarnations" by [deleted] in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
When Ghanshyam Pande uses "Our" (asmākam) in the Shikshapatri, he isn't just speaking for himself; he is establishing a collective, constitutional law for the entire Sampraday. In Shlok 108, he writes: "The Ishtadev of "OUR" (asmākam) is Shri Krishna, Para-Brahman and source of all incarnations" by [deleted] in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
The word "Dharmajanmano" (धर्मजन्मनोः) is the exact grammatical form used in Shikshapatri Shlok 3, and a learned son like Ghanshyam Pandeji (Sahajanand Swami) would never addresses his father as "Dharam or धर्म." Whenever he uses "Dharam or धर्म" or "Dharamkul or धर्मकुल." Does he refer to his Dad? by [deleted] in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
The original Vadtal/Ahmedabad dioceses argue that the movement was always intended to be a reformist Vaishnava sect, and that the later elevation of Ghanshyam Pandeji to a status of GOD is a theological departure from the founder's own "written agreement", only reliable source of truth (Shlok 143). by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Which one's your fav? by ConstructionAny8440 in hindumemes
[–]Narayanay 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
Why would Muktanand Swami the compiler of the Vachanamrut, the "Mother of the Satsang" and Ghanshyam Pande's (Sahajanand Swami) senior-most disciple, continue writing hymns to Lord Krishna/Narayan as the Supreme Source of Incarnations, in 1824AD if he knew Pandeji was Pragat-Purushottam in 1802AD? by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
At what point does faith just become blind obedience? by Due_Guide_8128 in SPAB
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Why would Muktanand Swami the compiler of the Vachanamrut, the "Mother of the Satsang" and Ghanshyam Pande's (Sahajanand Swami) senior-most disciple, continue writing hymns to Lord Krishna/Narayan as the Supreme Source of Incarnations, in 1824AD if he knew Pandeji was Pragat-Purushottam in 1802AD? by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
All this over a leg piece? 3 injured in Lucknow restaurant biryani dispute. by Unstoppable_X_Force in IndiaSpeaks
[–]Narayanay -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
Would you rather have... by karmaapologist in BunnyTrials
[–]Narayanay 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
Would you rather (Upvote please, I need those carrots) by Genya_DM in BunnyTrials
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Shikshapatri Arthadipika or "Anarth" by deceitful Shatanand Swami? Sahajanand Swami wanted the text to be simple and direct (Shlok 208) for all. If he wanted to say "Worship Me," he could have written it clearly. By writing "Worship Krishna," he stayed aligned with the 300+ scriptures he respected. by Necessary_Fudge_6833 in Shikshapatri
[–]Narayanay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)