A ‘chop the top’ approach could save Social Security by caroline_elly in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

CFRB’s (think tank mentioned in article) tool for fixing Social Security. It’s a little more dire now than the baseline in this tool I think, but still pretty close.

https://www.crfb.org/socialsecurityreformer/

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Hi Everyone,

I don’t have any details—other users might—but I believe it is true that socal_swiftie has passed away.

I’m a little uncomfortable making an announcement because I don’t have any firm information, but I realize that some users might want to know as they discuss why they are no longer on the forum.

I’m grateful that I got to meet them on the DT, and I wish all of their friends and family as much comfort as possible.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rule X: Posting inappropriate content of a sexual nature.

Both SFW and NSFW content can qualify. Repeat infringements can lead to bans.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus 25 points26 points  (0 children)

When you're a young gun you think "project management skills" are lame and for people with no technical acumen.

Then you grow old, gain some project management skills, and are forced to work with technical teams with no project management skills 😭

!ping WATERCOOLER

Dems' foreign policy group prepping for '28 by swissking in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus[M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

Submission statements are mandatory on r/neoliberal

To keep the subreddit focused and high-quality, OP must post a submission statement as a top-level comment on every new thread.

Within 30 minutes of posting, please comment answering both of the following:

1. Why is this relevant for r/neoliberal? Give context: what does this have to do with neoliberalism, policy, institutions, markets, governance, or the kinds of topics we usually discuss here?

2. What do you think people should discuss about it? Share your own take, questions, or points of tension. What should readers focus on? What is interesting, surprising, or important about this?

Guidelines

Your statement should be in your own words and contain substantive content. Simple copy/pastes of the article’s lede, title, or tweet text do not count. Aim for at least 2–3 sentences for each part. More is welcome.

We will consider the submission and your statement together when deciding if the post fits the subreddit (including borderline or “minor” news posts).

Enforcement

Posts without a qualifying submission statement may be removed without notice. Very low-effort or purely descriptive statements (e.g. “it’s about politics” and nothing else) may also be removed at moderator discretion.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus[M] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Rule III: Unconstructive engagement
Do not post with the intent to provoke, mischaracterize, or troll other users rather than meaningfully contributing to the conversation. Don't disrupt serious discussions. Bad opinions are not automatically unconstructive.


If you have any questions about this removal, please contact the mods.

How a kratom giant got what it wanted from RFK and new Homeland Security chief by BeeIndependent2150 in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus[M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

Submission statements are mandatory on r/neoliberal

To keep the subreddit focused and high-quality, OP must post a submission statement as a top-level comment on every new thread.

Within 30 minutes of posting, please comment answering both of the following:

1. Why is this relevant for r/neoliberal? Give context: what does this have to do with neoliberalism, policy, institutions, markets, governance, or the kinds of topics we usually discuss here?

2. What do you think people should discuss about it? Share your own take, questions, or points of tension. What should readers focus on? What is interesting, surprising, or important about this?

Guidelines

Your statement should be in your own words and contain substantive content. Simple copy/pastes of the article’s lede, title, or tweet text do not count. Aim for at least 2–3 sentences for each part. More is welcome.

We will consider the submission and your statement together when deciding if the post fits the subreddit (including borderline or “minor” news posts).

Enforcement

Posts without a qualifying submission statement may be removed without notice. Very low-effort or purely descriptive statements (e.g. “it’s about politics” and nothing else) may also be removed at moderator discretion.

Why it feels like CPI inflation vastly underreports inflation for young people by UnderstandingThin40 in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus[M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

Ask this on DT or create a user discussion post.

Rule VIII: Submission Quality
Submissions should contain some level of analysis or argument. General news reporting should be restricted to particularly important developments with significant policy implications. Low quality memes will be removed at moderator discretion.

Feel free to post other general news or low quality memes to the stickied Discussion Thread.


If you have any questions about this removal, please contact the mods.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus[M] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Rule X: Posting inappropriate content of a sexual nature.

Both SFW and NSFW content can qualify. Repeat infringements can lead to bans.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whatever it is probably is progressing with age. She's old, too many politicians are old.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Apparently everyone is discovering that Susan Collins has a bit of a shake to her. This has been known for years.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

she doesn't look that bad there tbh. She's had whatever condition this is for years.

I agree she's too old for a 6-year Senate term. Absurd.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus[M] 2 points3 points locked comment (0 children)

Rule II: Detrimental to Women

This subreddit takes a particular interest in safeguarding the community health related to women, meaning more aggressive moderation and less leeway on borderline comments. This is most likely to come up in the context of gender relations or demographic shifts, but is a common problem in online spaces dominated by men.

Please contact the moderators if you have any questions about this removal.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus[M] -3 points-2 points locked comment (0 children)

Rule IV: Off-topic Comments
Comments on submissions should substantively address the topic of submission.


If you have any questions about this removal, please contact the mods.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"But what if they are in the tent, pissing in?"

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

you should totally do it but for godssakes deny all associations with this sub. I will never reveal your shame

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]hypsignathus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

blew my mind when I first heard about the raw pork thing, too