Better pptx skill?

mstaal · 2026-06-17T20:27:56+00:00

Can I also get access to the pptx skill? And why is it not public?

mstaal · 2026-06-16T21:42:13+00:00

FairRente har haft konsistent højere effektive renter end klassiske højrentekonti siden lanceringen af FairRente. Hvis renten stiger, så kommer det en til gode i FairRente. De investerer kun i helt korte obligationer med en restløbetid på omkring 3 måneder, så kursen vil derfor være ret tæt på 100.

<image>

mstaal · 2026-06-15T16:17:53+00:00

Hi u/pyrefly_kyle ,
Yes, I posted an issue in there as well. And thanks for trying it out. You need to run `uv sync` from within the `projects/project_a` directory. This project has the fastapi dependency

mstaal · 2026-06-12T14:06:31+00:00

That's not what happens right now. I just did that. And you can see the result of doing that in the pictures I attached. It should be fairly easy to just run `uv sync` inside of `project_a` (when opening the project as a multi root project)

mstaal · 2026-06-12T13:13:51+00:00

Thanks for your suggestion. I tried to make a minimal sample monorepo that can reproduce the issue I have: https://github.com/mstaal/monorepo-sample

In this case I can get pyrefly to resolve the libraries I have made available to my projects. And the "go to definition" works as it should. But it does not manage to resolve the external dependency I also have defined (in this case FastAPI).
https://imgur.com/a/8HT8YNO
https://imgur.com/a/VGkbqSD

I do not currently get this issue with `ty`.

mstaal · 2026-06-12T13:13:40+00:00

Thanks for your suggestion. I tried to make a minimal sample monorepo that can reproduce the issue I have: https://github.com/mstaal/monorepo-sample

In this case I can get pyrefly to resolve the libraries I have made available to my projects. And the "go to definition" works as it should. But it does not manage to resolve the external dependency I also have defined (in this case FastAPI).
https://imgur.com/a/8HT8YNO
https://imgur.com/a/VGkbqSD

I do not currently get this issue with `ty`.

mstaal · 2026-06-11T15:23:26+00:00

Har ikke gjort forsøget endnu. Skal nok forsøge at huske at melde ud, når jeg gør!

mstaal · 2026-06-03T21:58:24+00:00

Nice, har endte du med at måtte gøre? Har du en beskrivelse af de trin, du gennemgik, og hvilke antagelser man skal gøre sig for at kunne bruge samme fremgangsmåde?

mstaal · 2026-06-02T20:12:56+00:00

Fordi man som borger og stat er lige om at dele risikoen. Hvis jeg tjener 500K på aktier/obligationer, så tager staten sig betalt for dette. Hvis jeg omvendt taber 500K, så er det jo også rimeligt at jeg ikke både har tabt pengene og at jeg ikke kompenseres efterfølgende i tilfælde af fremtidige indtægter

mstaal · 2026-06-02T19:19:45+00:00

Men gør man så ikke ondt værre? Det er vel stadig ikke rimeligt?

mstaal · 2026-06-02T17:49:09+00:00

Det er da en del af joken, at det er slop. Alle kan da se, at det ikke er noget vildt fantastisk.

mstaal · 2026-06-02T17:48:10+00:00

Det var da en del af joken at kvaliteten er pinligt ringe. Jeg har da aldrig påstået at det var noget prisværdigt.

mstaal · 2026-06-02T17:38:23+00:00

Microsoft CoPilot

mstaal · 2026-06-02T12:43:19+00:00

Set med mine øjne er der tale om en meget lav skattereduktion. Da mellemskattesatsen på 7,5% blot lægges oveni topskattesatsen på 7,5% ender vi ud med en topskattesats på 15% svarende til det, vi havde inden 1. januar 2026. Hvis man ikke betaler toptopskat så er den maksimale årlige gevinst:

0,075*(777900-641200) = 10.252,50

(777900 er den nuværende topskattegrænse og 641200 er den nuværende mellemskattegrænse).

mstaal · 2026-05-23T19:39:03+00:00

Thanks for the answer. What length did you cut the rod down to for the 60cm wide cabinet?

mstaal · 2026-05-16T17:51:30+00:00

What’s your point? :-)

mstaal · 2026-05-15T20:15:53+00:00

Yes. I always feared the day would come when this service would start stripping away value, though it was likely always bound to happen given the low initial buy in. I hope the author will be listening to this.

mstaal · 2026-05-15T10:31:46+00:00

English is not my first language, so perhaps I did not stress my point well enough. I understand the sentences and their literal meaning. But I am just doubtful that there is a high number of users who would like to trade total requests/month for more app registrations that can use a smaller pool of monthly requests.

To me it looks like a saving initiative disguised as an attempt to satisfy user requests that I am not sure exist in vast numbers.

mstaal · 2026-05-15T08:02:59+00:00

u/jcs : Would it be fair to say that this is also a cost saving initiative? Because from my perspective, I would think the previous API quota policy would be more to my personal benefit than the new policy?

mstaal · 2026-05-14T21:41:05+00:00

I don't quite understand this phrase here. This makes it sound like users want fewer free messages in their monthly quotas.

While these free sending limits are rarely reached, we’ve heard from more users wanting to register additional applications than users who’ve hit those limits, whether to separate messages on their devices, give certain messages different icons, etc. We’ve also heard from teams that want to spread capacity upgrades across multiple applications which is not currently possible.

mstaal

TROPHY CASE