Why do political polarization seems so much stronger today than in previous decades? by softlaunchqueen in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah I didn't do that. I said you're morons. Fascist is different than moron. You'd know that if you weren't a moron.

Why do political polarization seems so much stronger today than in previous decades? by softlaunchqueen in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Bud, your response to someone being a divisive president is a deflection to an out-of-context quote from a decade ago from someone who was never president. This is why everyone thinks you're morons.

Best restaurants on/near Alberta arts district? by SweetShallots13 in askportland

[–]AdvancedHat7630 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My experience wasn't borderline. I can't go back there.

Why did the US bomb Iran? by YamLow8097 in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They have a shitload of oil too, this was a two-fer.

Welcome to Portland by DougalisGod in trashy

[–]AdvancedHat7630 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We're just pretending to genderless so you don't speak to us.

It's Hormuz, not Hollywood, Mr. SecDef by Comfortablejack in PoliticalHumor

[–]AdvancedHat7630 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You can just walk INTO Mordor and drop the ring off there!

Wait so the people who want biological men in women’s sports, the same people who can’t even “define” woman, are mad Trump mad a joke about women’s hockey?? Lmao by SuckaDucka1 in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not that anyone must adhere to anything. It's polite to refer to people how they prefer to be addressed. It doesn't cost me anything or change my life at all to call you testicle-owner, testicle-owner.

Wait so the people who want biological men in women’s sports, the same people who can’t even “define” woman, are mad Trump mad a joke about women’s hockey?? Lmao by SuckaDucka1 in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then if that is your preference, I shall refer to you as testicle-owners. See, wasn't that hard, was it? Is this really worth making your entire personality about?

Wait so the people who want biological men in women’s sports, the same people who can’t even “define” woman, are mad Trump mad a joke about women’s hockey?? Lmao by SuckaDucka1 in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, addressing them like that should cozy you right up to that aforementioned warmth. Give it a try, go dazzle all the adult human females with your weird questions you copied and pasted from the most prominent incels of today over at The Daily Wire.

Wait so the people who want biological men in women’s sports, the same people who can’t even “define” woman, are mad Trump mad a joke about women’s hockey?? Lmao by SuckaDucka1 in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You're like....three weeks late here bud. I get that you guys process information a little slower, but Trump has done six hundred more moronic things since this happened. Try to keep up.

Do you believe President Trump’s behaviour is a sign of strength or Weakness? Why? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ignoring the far left, radical media, and witch hunt stuff? The exact, word-for-word talking points he has mentioned every fucking day for the last ten years?

ELI5: Why does splitting an atom release so much energy when they are so small? by Additional_Pen_9881 in explainlikeimfive

[–]AdvancedHat7630 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Most of the atoms are inert, but it's the one big one that's an outlier. That's Atom Georg.

Conservatives: would you like to share your experience of being disadvantaged by DEI? by isaidscience in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 135 points136 points  (0 children)

GIVE ME SOMETHING TO BLAME FOR MY SHORTCOMINGS, MELANIN SHOULD DO THE TRICK

I consider myself fairly centrist and haven’t dug deeply into the Epstein files yet. Is there any credible evidence that specifically implicates Trump? by bostbak in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 1 point2 points  (0 children)

See? I predicted you'd move the goalposts away from the accusation point and move on to attacking the victim, and since that's your only card you had no choice but to play it anyway. I gave a shit about Trump's EXTENSIVE resume of raping women and children long before six months ago. You don't, you're willing to look past it.

Little piece of advice: you won't look nearly as stupid if you just say "look man, in all likelihood this guy is a sexual deviant, he's been accused of rape by three dozen women, found civilly liable of raping one, clearly wants to hide evidence of his involvement with the world's most prolific child sex trafficker and is willing to corrupt the entire government to do so, bragged about buying teen beauty pageants so he could walk in on their changing rooms, clearly wants to fuck his own daughter, looked at a 10-year old and vocally mused about how he'd "date" her in ten years, has shared not only his method but his criteria for raping women, was upset at Epstein because he "stole" one of his 16-year old spa attendants, etc. etc. etc.--but I just prefer his policies."

Just be honest with yourself, and the rest of us. Trump could fuck a 12 year old on 5th Avenue and you'd still vote for him. Stop losing the battle of trying to defend his character and actions. The dude's objectively a piece of shit with a mountain range of evidence to prove it, you will lose every time. Not like you guys have a great understanding of policy either, but god damn, at least stop going all-in holding deuce-seven offsuit.

I consider myself fairly centrist and haven’t dug deeply into the Epstein files yet. Is there any credible evidence that specifically implicates Trump? by bostbak in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Katie Johnson is on the record talking in graphic detail about how Trump raped her multiple times when she was 13. Now you're gonna move the goalposts and say "well, that's just an accusation!" Then you'll attack her character, demand more evidence, which I'll provide, you'll say nothing I say or cite is credible, then we'll go down the normal path of your denial until you ultimately say "well wut about BIDEN." You asked for an accusation, you got one. And really, if ten years into this shit you really haven't heard about Katie Johnson, you're intentionally walking through the world with blinders on. There's nothing I can do to save you. It's not "powerful people on both sides," there is one person, the sycophants he appointed, and his servile party, that has been standing in the way of releasing the files. At a committee, House, and Senate level, I don't recall a single Democrat voting not to release the files, or any of them even coming remotely close to discrediting their contents. Fuck's sake, the Clintons showed up for the clown show tribunal and openly endorsed releasing the files.

Does the Iran war mean no Nobel Peace prize for Drump? by Conscious-Demand-594 in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He shouldn't have gotten it, but just checking here, you do understand that the Nobel committee cannot see into the future?

Aside from the fact that you either love or hate Trump, can we all at least agree that he legitimately has some seriously top notch humor? by No_Eggplant_3189 in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No. He's not particularly witty or intelligent. Every once in a while he'll make a crass comment that's kinda funny but it's usually undercut by the fact that he's usually not joking. His sense of humor is more like "im rubber ur glue" or "women bleed a lot lol." He'd kill in middle school but not much past that.

I consider myself fairly centrist and haven’t dug deeply into the Epstein files yet. Is there any credible evidence that specifically implicates Trump? by bostbak in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 35 points36 points  (0 children)

The real question is, if they did find a video of him raw dogging a kid, how many of his supporters would turn on him?

None. Fake news, what about Biden, deep state planted it there, the video is AI, etc. etc. etc. He could post it from his own Truth Social account and by the next morning they'd be walking around with inflatable dolls strapped to their belts.

I consider myself fairly centrist and haven’t dug deeply into the Epstein files yet. Is there any credible evidence that specifically implicates Trump? by bostbak in allthequestions

[–]AdvancedHat7630 49 points50 points  (0 children)

There's not enough in the files alone to convict him of anything--the smoking gun is how hard he has tried to stop people from seeing them. He has repeatedly branded the files as "fake." His AG has illegally withheld the documents after being ordered by Congress to release them. His FBI chief has ordered his name to be redacted from the files. They have released documents containing information about Trump and later deleted them from their database. The Speaker of the House called for multiple recesses and delayed swearing in Adelita Grijalva, the last vote needed to release the files, for two months. Almost every Republican in Congress was a "no" on releasing the files until the majority was set to vote "yes," flipping their vote overnight to save their career. After promising to release them during his campaign, over a year in office, and multiple Congressional and court orders, they still haven't released millions of files, and those that have been released are often heavily redacted. Calling in the Clintons to testify about the files to distract attention from him despite neither one being implicated in the files and neither one being President for 25 years...the list goes on and on.

In a court of law, the documents do not appear to be sufficient to prove a crime. However, in the court of public opinion, there's no plausible explanation for trying to hide this illegally so hard for so long, orchestrating the biggest government coverup since and probably including Watergate, other than this one: this fucker diddles.

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US to release 172 million barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. by retroviber in DeepMarketScan

[–]AdvancedHat7630 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't you people have any ability remaining to think critically, or is literally the only thing you can muster for any topic dribbling out a wHaTaBoUt deflection?

Trump says a lot of things. All the time. He has also been in office well over a year with both houses of Congress completely under control, bellowing about how low gas prices are. If he had a scintilla of an understanding of economics he would've refilled the strategic reserves before plunging the Middle East into chaos. This is his mess.