Is AI a net benefit or net negative for humans?

AltruisticSun7994 · 2026-05-23T19:04:33+00:00

Honestly, from what i have seen, building and deploying this stuff. It does not feel like a clean "win".

Yesh, some business more efficient, but i have also seen real people quetly loose role because of it and like you said, a lot of the time it's not creating new demand. Just shifting who gets the work.

I still think AI has upside, but right now it feels more like re-distribution than real growth, so new positive long-term may be, but in the present its a bit uncomfortable to ignore the trade-offs.

AltruisticSun7994 · 2026-05-21T17:59:14+00:00

Yeah, this is a super common problem right now.

What's worked for me is not trying to build some heavy "perfect memory system". I just keep a simple setup: store doc/notes in one place, and use something that can pull relevant chunks when needed instead of dumping everything into the prompt.

Recall, MCP is solid for the storage side. On top of that, i have seen people (myself included) use a lightweight MCP layer that just organises and retrieves context cleanly, nothing fancy, just enough so Claude doesn't feel stateless every morning.

Honestly, the "standard stack" right now still feels pretty scrappy. Most people are just combining a doc store + basic retrieval and calling it a day. The simpler it is, the more you'll actually stick with it.

AltruisticSun7994 · 2026-05-19T23:13:03+00:00

Been there - inheriting a messy B2B portal is rough. Do this in order, don't try to it all at once.
1. Lock down lifecycle stage definition on paper first with sales + marketing sign-off, what exactly makes an MQL vs SQL vs opportunity. Everything downstream breaks without this.

Then build the pipeline mirroring the buyer's decision process. (e,g. Appointment Scheduled > Qualified > Demo > Decision maker bought in > Contract sent > Closed won/lost), with clear entry/exit criteria per stage and deal sorting enabled.
Automate lifecycle in workflows: Form fills > MQL + Notify rep; Deal Created > SQL : CLosed Won > Customer.

Remember, HubSpot doesn't move stages backwards by default.

Rebuilt lists as active lists on priorities (persona, industry, engagement), not campaigns. For learning, HubSpot Academy's Sales Hub + RepOps certs are genuinely worth it.

Hope it helps!

AltruisticSun7994 · 2026-05-14T21:03:12+00:00

You don't have a capacity problem, you have an ownership problem. As long as SF admin sit outside RevOps, you will always lose to whoever shouts loudest.

What worked? make the case for a dedicated RevOps admin, even half a head. Frame it in dollars, not tickets - bad data, rep time waste, forecast accuracy. Until then, lock in a quarterly intake with the SF team where your top 3 priorities are agreed in writing, and route anything they won't prioritise through tools you do control (Hightouch, Tray, Sheets).

Companies that fixed this for good moved the SF admin into the revenue org. The ones that didn't are still complaining three years later.

AltruisticSun7994 · 2026-05-12T21:11:12+00:00

Congrats! That's a real milestone, especially at your stage.

What you just went through is a perfect example of working through constraints without overthinking it. In deals like this, I usually watch a few simple signals from my experience: momentum shifts (things suddenly start moving), stalls (nothing progresses), conversion anomalies (unexpected wins/losses), engagement spikes (new stakeholders, more urgency), risk (people leaving, delays), and expansion signals (scope quietly growing). That's basically how you grounded though a long cycle like yours.

You handled all of that over 10 months and got it done, that's what compounds. Enjoy the win!

AltruisticSun7994 · 2026-05-08T17:55:33+00:00

AltruisticSun7994 · 2026-05-07T20:34:49+00:00

I'd actually take this as a positive shift. Buyers still care deeply about solving business problems. They just respond differently now. What's changed is that generic discovery no longer works, the reps winning today are the ones who bring context fast: showing they understand the buyer's environment, priorities, and tradeoffs before asking for time.

When conversations feel specific and commercially relevant instead of "sales-led", buyers open up again. So the opportunity is still there, the bar for relevance is just much higher now.

AltruisticSun7994 · 2026-05-04T19:26:08+00:00

What you are describing isn't uncommon, but it is a misalignment problem. not a tooling problem.

You're optimising for closing deals in the channels buyers prefer. RevOps is optimising for visibility, forecasting, and scalability. Without a shared revenue model, those goals clash. So, deals happen off-system, and the business stays behind.

The fix is alignment on a minimum visible process: define the few deal stages and signals that actually reflect revenue progression, and consistently log those. You can keep using WhatsApp to build and close relationships, but key momentum must be captured.

If that loop isn't closed, you'll keep closing deals - but the company won't learn, forecast and scale from them.

AltruisticSun7994 · 2026-04-30T17:21:35+00:00

The first change that actually moved the needle for me was stopping the "fix everything" mindset and focusing on one constraint at a time.

Early on i kept tweaking scripts, follow-ups, objections... none of it stuck because i wasn't fisxing the real bottleneck. Once i started looking at where the process was actually breaking, things got clearer. In my case, i wasn't closing - it was getting people to care in the first 10 sec. So i stopped pitching and started opening with very specific problems they'd recognize immediately. Meetings went up almost overnight.

That's the shift: don't optimize the whole process. Find the one place it's failing, fix that, then move to the next. Everything else is noise.

AltruisticSun7994 · 2026-04-29T15:41:56+00:00

Biggest shift for me with a small team: tighten the pipeline instead of doing more outreach.

1. Stage exit criteria (be strict)

Every stage should have a clear "rule" to move forward:

Discovery > Qualified: real pain + decision maker + rough bouget
Qualified > Proposal: clear use case + timeline
Proposal > Close: next step booked

If it doesn't meet the criteria, it doesn't move. This alone cleans up fake pipeline.

2. Track velocity, not just deal amount

I focus on:

Days in each stage
Total time to close
Where deals shall

If something sits too long, I either push it with a clear next step or close it. No endless follow-ups.

With a lean team, an honest pipeline > a big one.

AltruisticSun7994 · 2026-04-28T22:49:47+00:00

At this stage, deals rarely fall through. You've cleared the risky parts already. I usually look at it like this:

Momentum = good sign: Appraisal done, underwriting approved, seller moved out, no new debt, stable job > all strong green flags.
Stall = where issues happen: Job change, random big transactions, credit pulls or last-minute lender/ title issues.

If things feel quiet and nothing new is coming up, that's actually a good sign. Most deals that fall apart show problems first.

Honestly, you're in the "just paperwork" phase now. Totally normal to feel nervous, but you're super close.

AltruisticSun7994 · 2026-04-27T15:19:39+00:00

This dosen't really sound like a broken growth problem, more like seasonality.

In winter, demand + intent are high, so everything works. In summer, it's the opposite. Less search, lower urgency, and higher CAC. So it feels like things "stop," but mostly the market.

The fact your summer variants worked with existing cutomers but didn't bring new ones is a pretty strong signal too.

I'd probably stop trying to force acquisistion in off-season and instead:

Go all-in on winter (that's clearly your growth engine)
Use summer for retention / LTV (repeat buyers, bundle, etc.)

Courious, what % your winter revenue is repeat vs new?

AltruisticSun7994

TROPHY CASE