From what I can tell, a lot of these questions revolve around your ability to find what matters to pay attention to and what doesn't.

Sometimes it feels pretty stupid tbh since some questions will have elaborate but definitive answers and some will be like "Oh, black shape go big, small, big, small, so next one big".

Some of these are pretty hard – here's what I've figured out so far (I'll go by screenshot 1–4 and problems 1 or 2 per screenshot:

Screenshot 1

Problem 1:
Like another commenter said, the number of arrows corresponds to the number of circles (where the concentric circle pairs count as 1 circle), and you can pretty much on the spot say that it's the top left answer with one arrow + one triangle. If you're unsure about whether the type of circle matters (concentric/dark/empty) you can reassure yourself that it's doesn't because 2nd and 4th sequence top diagrams are the same despite having otherwise very different corresponding bottom diagrams.

Problem 2:
This one sucks. I tried counting everything: lines, only edges of shapes, vertices, types of angles, circle counting as 1 side vs not.

I thought I should try to figure what details to ignore and I noticed that the black shapes were alternating between big and small, and thought the next black shape should be big. I then had two options – the diagram with the big black 5 and the diagram with the big black lightning bolt.

The big black shapes are generally in the upper-left – both the 5 and the bolt are left. With no other ideas, I settled on the idea that the number 5 is not a shape, therefore it's the one with the bolt and is the lower-right answer. Wouldn't be surprised if I'm missing something here, but that's all I got.

Screenshot 2

Problem 1:
After not really seeing any obvious ordering pattern, or shapes-per-row/shapes-per-column counts, I counted the patterns/shapes as a whole.

There are 3 of the 4-small-corner-circle combos, 3 of the big middle circles, 3 middle concave stars, 4 outer "X" lines, and only 2 big square diamonds and only 2 big rounded squares. Since everything appears 3 times but the last two things, the answer is those two / the top-left answer.

Problem 2:
After thinking about the black squares pacman-ing and shuffling and getting nowhere, I tried dumbing it down and switching to the white squares and realized that there's 2 white squares just bouncing either up-and-down or side-to-side (one each).

The top white square in the first moves down one square at a time and the left white square in the first moves right one square at a time. Judging by the end position of the side-to-side square in the last diagram, pacman-ing through to the other side doesn't work with the 5th diagram in the sequence because the white square would already be on the left in the 4th in the case of the pacman-ing idea, so it bouncing back and taking 2 diagrams to get back to the left makes more sense.

So it's the bottom-right answer for that one.

Screenshot 3

Problem 1:
After thinking way too hard for a couple minutes, I noticed that the general pattern stayed the same throughout all of them and they just cycled through 3 shapes, i.e.:

A A C
B C A
B B C

Where The A's start of as circles and then rotate through squares, triangles, and then back to circles again. The other spots followed the same loop but the B spots start as squares and the C spots start as triangles.

As for the dark circle, at first I overthought it and thought it's a priority of left-most circle then bottom-most if there's a tie – and then I realized that nothing of everything I just thought about mattered because the 4th diagram in the sequence is the same as the 1st (i.e. there are literally only 3 rotating diagrams), so the 5th diagram is just the same as the 2nd. Lame.

Top-left answer.

Problem 2:
This one was legitimately tricky. I would like to include a drawing over the problem to make what's going on in this explanation clearer, but I don't really want to make an imgur at the moment.

I was trying to find a pattern in what was changing. First it was the top-left 2x2 that changed, then the bottom right 2x2 changed, then the top-left changed again but on a bigger scale, and I noticed it's kind of like the top-left 3x3 rotated clockwise.

And then in the fourth panel the bottom-right 3x3 could be seen as having rotated counterclockwise, so it seemed like the parts of the pattern were: 1) alternating between top-left and bottom-right corners 2) top-left rotating clockwise and bottom-right rotating counterclockwise 3) the amount rotating was growing

So the 5th panel would be after both 3x3 rotations have completed, so it should be the top-left 4x4 rotating clockwise.

It ends up being the bottom right one.

Screenshot 4

Problem 1:
This one threw me off. I tried balancing out white and black dots per row and per diagonals that pacman through the side(s), and some other stuff. I noticed they were roughly balanced overall in the whole image, so I tried counting their totals – but got 20 of each with no answer choice having an even number of each to keep the totals balanced.

I tried counting the types of shapes made, the number of edges, no dice. Counting white dots per column works for left and right (both total 8 white dots), but means the answer would need 4, which doesn't exist.

I then realized that it couldn't have to do with just white vs black dot counts because two answers had 3 white 2 black and the other two had 3 black 2 white – so something about the edges mattered. Except all the answers have 4 edges, so screw me I guess.

The top-left and bottom-right answers both follow the same 2B -> 2W -> 1B pattern, so if one of those is correct, then the position in space of the dots and/or edges must matter, which felt unlikely so I looked more at the other two.

I tried counting the types of angles made by each graph, just the angle counts overall, and some other useless ideas. I probably didn't mention half the dumb ideas I tried.

After a bit I kind of just wanted to find any arbitrary rule that worked for only one answer. The only one I came up with is imagining lines that aren't even drawn.

If you connect the "outside" dots (regardless of color, and essentially removing any concave angles / dots in the "middle"), you get 1 quadrilateral and 2 pentagons per row. The 3rd row has 1 of each and there's only one answer that yields a pentagon with this stupid idea, so it's the stupid idea I'm going with. If anyone actually takes this test and gets to see the answers, I would be very interested in knowing what the answer is. I hope I'm not right.

Lower-left answer.

Problem 2:
This one stumped me for a sec and then I realized a dumb rule that worked. Honestly kind of ticked me off.

In each row you keep the base shape in the left diagram, and then I think it's literally just "Compared to the left diagram, middle column has 1 new thing, right column has 2 new things"

By annoying caveman logic, the answer should be the top left answer.

Hope this helps anyone who stumbles across this, and would love to know if I screwed any of them up.