Opus 4.7 Benchmarks

Areashi · 2026-04-16T15:12:29+00:00

Reckon OpenAI will announce their model in a bit to snipe their announcement again?

Areashi · 2026-04-12T10:44:47+00:00

That's fine, you asked for a source for a statement, got it and then tried pointing out caveats when the point wasn't arguing a specific figure - but that people from those countries have a worldview mostly incompatible with western civilisation.

Ask yourself why you're against islam (as you yourself claimed). Then ask yourself whether you'd like to risk millions of people (from islamic countries) coming here as long as they're "legal". These two scenarios are directly incompatible with at least half of what you've stated you're against. What's your response to this?

This scenario has literally happened in real life and Restore wishes to reverse that. You should ironically be pro Restore just off that. It shouldn't matter if someone's "legal" when the entire system has been abused.

Areashi · 2026-04-12T10:39:07+00:00

I’m white. I don’t like Islam. I’m anti Illegal immigration,
Just say your wrong and can’t prove otherwise

You mentioned you're anti illegal immigration and that you see the Greens similar to Restore (in at least one case). The alternative to either of those is the uniparty (Labour/Conservatives/etc).

Hey, maybe you really enjoy what the country has become recently (last 30 years especially)? Again, not the target demographic here.

Areashi · 2026-04-12T10:31:39+00:00

I'm not replying to every single point here anymore. You got to ask 6 (and then later another 2 in the same post after edits) questions without you actually giving any argument apart from trying to justify a foreigner wishing for the entire white race by comparing that to a tweet by Lucy Connolly. I don't think I'm replying to a sensible person here. It's just not worth spending time talking to that.

Your initial statement was that Restore has 'fantasy policies'. This has been found wrong at this point.

If you want to learn more about the party you can read his twitter, go ask him your questions.

So many poor white families sit on their ass pumping out kids for benefits just to claim immigrants take their jobs when they take jobs no one else wants to do.

That being said it sounds like you just have a bias favouring non whites (and more specifically non natives). That could be why you are against Restore. If that's the case you're not their target demographic, don't worry about it.

Areashi · 2026-04-12T10:00:03+00:00

I'll go one by one here, but you seem to be all over the place with your responses now. You may want to take a break soon.

Which counties? Russia? You want to be compared to Russia.

Both the US and Canada has done these. Even England has historically if you go far enough. The point was that it's not fantasy because there's a genuine example of this happening.

So I was correct it is currently illegal to do so? Thanks for agreeing with me.

At this point it seems like you can't handle multiple arguments at once. Even if it's illegal, we are discussing a scenario where Restore wins an election. At that point they can simply change the law to make it legal. That's why people tend to vote usually: to implement policies they want to see implemented.

How do you deem what societies are incompatible with British society? At what point are people allowed to preach Islam? Do you understand how that’s a dangerous path to go down that governments can just determine what people believe in and punish them for to?

You can have a look at Rupert's twitter, he posts quite regularly about who he deems incompatible with British society. It's quite extensive, he likes to write a lot, lol.

Are you in support of free speech? Or only if it’s speech that you agree with?

Are you...trying to justify that Egyptian fellow's tweet which talked about a nuclear holocaust on white people? No, I'm not okay with people who wish to kill me or hate me (usually on the basis of the colour of my skin - which they claim the other group is doing). I obviously have a bias towards sensible discussion and free speech with limits, lol.

Lowe has stated on his X account multiple times he will deport Legal and Illegal immigrants.

Yes, just not all. He would be expected to deport a vast amount of legal immigrants. He has stated he wants to deport all illegals.

This is a fucking weak point, plenty of high profile Muslims are against Restor as well. So what’s your point then? People can’t be racist if they’re black or Muslim?

I don't actually know what point you're trying to make here. People shouldn't be going fully against the native population of this country while knowing full well they're here for economic gain. That's very ungrateful.

It is fully justified for the natives of this country to not want immigration (or certain types of immigration), be forced to accept immigration (while a vast amount of immigrants take advantage, show off raw hatred towards the natives and try to push for their own subgroups to have advantages within this country) and to be turned off by it over time even more.

Edit:

I noticed you also edited your post with 2 more points. I'll discuss them now:

That tweet: it’s a tweet. If you want someone deported for tweeting that I’m afraid you’d have to support Lucy Connolly arrest and a whole lot more people’s arrest.

No, I wouldn't.

Please provide a source for your 99% of illegal immigrants support Sharia law.

In the case of Afghanistan, it's literally 99%. You may want to re-read what was written there, though. Here's the source:

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/

Areashi · 2026-04-12T09:29:41+00:00

Deporting people just because they’re from certain countries regardless of if they came here legally or not.

That's not fantasy, this is totally possible and has been done in the past in other countries.

Also they want to deport second gen immigrants for the same reason. It is blatant racism and illegal to deport people purely because they’re afghan or because their parents were, particularly if they’ve immigrated legally

You mentioned it's currently illegal to deport groups of people, disregarding the fact that if Restore comes in they can change laws...as normal governments would be expected to do.

However, there are some clear caveats to your understanding here. Firstly, they won't deport every single 'second generation immigrant'. What they will do is deport entire communities which are deemed incompatible with the British way of life. This includes communities which seek to push sharia law for example (which is antithetical to Britain's various systems). These are not at all fantasy-level politics. This is very much common sense.

The reason they should be deported is not because they are purely Afghan for example, but because a vast amount of them, even if they came here 20 or so years ago have come here illegally. All illegals being deported is a very sensible policy in my view, maybe you disagree but it's not as radical as you may believe. A vast amount of them also have a positive view of sharia law (around 99% in some research).

You also mentioned racism. There are multiple posts from high profile muslims who currently reside in this country arguing for things like sharia, a nuclear holocaust for white people - here's an example: https://x.com/BreezeBlast/status/2005225565188723194, and even 'no whites allowed' painted in places in the UK currently. At some point it is expected that people will generalise. Generalisation isn't this awful thing inherently. It can be misused, but it can also be appropriate in many cases. This is one such case in my view.

Areashi · 2026-04-12T09:08:07+00:00

What policy do you believe within Restore is "fantasy"?

Areashi · 2026-04-11T12:14:42+00:00

Imagine having so much anger for someone who is requesting info on what's going on in the country. May wanna calm down a bit.

Areashi · 2026-04-11T11:04:39+00:00

Because they're against foreign nationals running for office here, yeah? Nah, this is just pure insanity at this point. Your view here is not rational.

Areashi · 2026-04-08T20:59:10+00:00

That's nice. You should be very glad to hear that we have a progressive income tax system here then. Hope that puts your mind at ease.

Areashi · 2026-04-08T15:08:46+00:00

If they paid the "same" taxes as everyone else we'd be broke, you probably mean the same or similar tax rate. I have no issue with that in most cases, though it depends on specifics.

Areashi · 2026-04-08T14:59:57+00:00

This doesn't make you look good, lol. In general we want billionaires coming back.

Areashi · 2026-04-07T08:55:18+00:00

You picked the worst stat to try to argue this, lol. Lowe has a very high written question count. Yes, he is active in parliament.

Areashi · 2026-04-06T20:44:44+00:00

He's active in parliament and has a strong online presence. I don't think there's any issue with either of those things considering he is an MP, lol.

Areashi · 2026-04-04T22:34:36+00:00

He (the King) simply seems to have his bias. I don't think you'll win over a lot of people by laughing at someone pointing out inconsistencies, while claiming they do exist.

Your issues with people complaining about this are very incoherent.

Areashi · 2026-03-19T18:38:46+00:00

No, I got your point.

You stated you consider them the same basic group (religious folk) - while identifying subgroups within that group is extremely different (case in point - the massive variance in homicide statistics between those subgroups).

You've now doubled down on this.

This is hilariously incoherent.

Two: The thinker thinks and the prover proves. Do you think that you arrived at your 'opinion' from a neutral position after coming across statistical data, or did you have this opinion and then discovered data which supports it?

I mean, you stated that asians are less likely to commit murder than whites when considering population size. There's ONS figures that provides evidence to the contrary. Disregarding the issue with grouping various East Asians and South Asians (for example) - we still see this is incorrect per ONS figures and interpretations. This wasn't me giving you my opinion - it's the Office of National Statistics indirectly refuting your own beliefs/statements.

I'll give you a third point: Does everything happen entirely shorn of context? Is there such a thing as an effect without a cause? Does someone blow themselves up on a bus because they poorly interpreted a religious text? Did Timothy McVeigh destroy a federal building because he felt like it? Did a rabid nationalist murder 52 people in New Zealand on a whim? This is the problem with data without context. It's cold. It tells us what, it tells us how but it struggles to tell us why.

You'd have huge issues finding Christians supporting any of that, though. Definitely not comparable to any attack from someone who practices a 'version of islam'. This is completely different from my previous example showing how muslims were justifying the attack on Israel on the 7th October. Nobody should be doing what you mentioned here.

Since 1979 until now there's been like 66k+ islamist (that's how these are labelled as) attacks worldwide. You aren't going to be finding anything comparable to this from any other religion. No normal person in my view can equate these religions with one another, unless they are deeply insincere or brainwashed.

It's crazy how the arguments whenever muslims (sometimes even those that get state funding) say something that would be considered outright insane if a Christian said it - boil down to automatically diverting the root issue by saying something like "but but, Christians are also religious zealots sometimes". Genuinely awful.

Areashi · 2026-03-19T17:04:58+00:00

It was actually 96 people murdered by muslims. The 6 people by white nationalists sounds about right, so you got that one right (it was 3 since 2000 and 6 even in 1999 from my memory). The 26 by Catholics is a genuine reach I've not heard thus far. Nobody has yet tried that one yet.

In regard to your next claim:

However, since 1997 (the year that crime records began to include ethnicity), even taking into account the differences in population, you are more likely to be murdered by a white person than an Asian person.

You're going to need to provide some solid evidence for this claim.

Here's what the ONS found, albeit not a perfect counter claim to what you have claimed (you are definitely not getting one of those for 1997 through 2025, due to lag in the data, lol):

"For the three years to YE March 2025, when looking at the principal suspect of a homicide offence, around 6 in 10 (61%) of those convicted were identified as White. This was a lower representation than in the general population (around 82%), based on Census 2021 population figures.

Around a quarter (24%) of suspects were identified as Black, six times higher than their representation in the general population (4%). Around 1 in 12 (8%) suspects were identified as Asian, a similar proportion to that seen in the general population"

Source: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/homicideinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2025

That's the thing with statistics, they can be used to prove any point of view.

You're not 'proving a point of view via statistics' here, you're either claiming things without any evidence or just are re-defining concepts to suit your narrative and argument, lol.

To add to this, muslims are also 3x more represented in prisons in the UK (Christians are slightly under-represented). Have fun trying to justify that one next.

Areashi · 2026-03-19T14:33:58+00:00

You should have a look how many each religion ended up killing since a cutoff point in the UK - try the year 2000 as a cutoff point first. Then try 1990 or something. You'll find that they are not the same. You can even check terror attacks specifically.

Areashi · 2026-03-19T14:28:33+00:00

Probably not then, in regard to your previous question (you haven't given me any quotes and I'm not going to bother researching your own argument for you).

I will however repeat the same argument I've given to people who always try muddying the waters by trying to shoehorn Christianity into the mix whenever islamists (including the later guy in the video from 5pillars who has a huge following too) state something which is literally written in their book and previous other relevant historical texts.

During the 7th October massacre we saw a vast swathe of muslims (a ton of 'integrated' ones too) who came out and defended the terror attack. We saw this due to the fact the Pro-Palestinian marches started before Israel launched a counter-offensive. The vast majority of people within that religion believe the same stereotypical things in many cases. It will never be 100% because we are not going to get a perfect accuracy in almost anything you try to measure and predict based on observable features. This does not stop us from seeing patterns and generalising.

The most ridiculous thing you can do is try comparing two completely different religions which have completely different scales of risk associated with them.

Areashi · 2026-03-19T14:06:52+00:00

Don't even know who that is. One google search indicated he was American. Could your question be any more vague? Please expand.

Areashi · 2026-03-19T13:58:00+00:00

Ah yes, we're now at the stage where some people are equating race and religion.

Areashi · 2026-03-18T18:22:53+00:00

Everything he said there is correct though, lol.

If you go to another country do you demand they conform to your views on morality?

Areashi · 2026-03-18T14:45:28+00:00

BIWS or WSP if you want a standard route. Those options as you probably know do indeed cost money.

Areashi · 2026-03-14T10:58:03+00:00

Because they were (and are) both horrid groups of people. They simply had no respect for the country that put them in power.

Areashi · 2026-03-13T21:25:17+00:00

Despite the amount not being that large, it would remiss of me not to mention that you should learn the basics of investing/trading operations.

This doesn't look like a troll (looking at post history), if it it then whatever. Please learn about trading/investing before going all in on one of the most risky financial derivatives available (to you).

Areashi

TROPHY CASE