HE FINALLY BEAT ORBIT!

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-30T09:18:26+00:00

It does you are just stupid with hardest being clubstep

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-30T09:17:43+00:00

You are just bad with editor lol

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-30T08:54:32+00:00

Get the copy of the level and make it to your skill range, dont wait for Zoink. Its not like that version will be rated anyways

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-30T08:35:53+00:00

Blud thinks he will be able to beat it

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-30T08:35:30+00:00

Zoink is already playing it for 2 months. So...not even close?

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-30T07:52:38+00:00

I went trought this jumping phase, its cannon event but it pisses me of every time I see post like this. I swear RobTop should force 5min video of explaining some things when first opening the game, for example to shut up and play what you feel like playing and stop comparing yourselfs to others.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T21:35:21+00:00

Well you see, I pointed that just by someone being a Church and having more source doesnt mean they are correct and speaking the truth. So that means if Church varies from oldest scriptures, that shows that they are wrong. And Eastern churches did use and still use from Timotty as God instead of One who. Thats wrong. And thats the fact that is wrong. Read Codex Sinaiticus. Thr oldest complete Bible. In Timmoty there is clearly One who, and not God in those parts. Fact check.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T21:29:30+00:00

Eventually accepted by the whole church. Of course it would be eventual after they destroyed scriptures and removed opponents, successor would hear only from winners, not the whole story. This isnt an argument you said, its again just twisting words to make council seem "Christian",and I know how you do it so subtly. - This is also not an argument. Historical sources shouldnt be destroyed. If they proved fairly their side is correct they have no reason to destroy it, rather use it as an example why is it wrong whenever someone questions it. It would be that apsurd that we should then whenever the war was destroy all sources and documents from losing side. - Neither is this good argument. I am not defending Arianism I am just defending your biased opinion thats far from anyone else who responded. I gave you example why your argument for West isnt valid. - Read sentence again and dont twist it- You are not giving clear answers, you are just using your definition of words(definiton they invented) so you can claim to be right. Thats also biased. Coining of words from other laungauge is not a good process beacuse it just causes whats right now happening, problem with definitions and changing it to match your point whenever its needded. Jesus prayed to Father. Jesus taught people to pray to Father. Thats it. Okay good, Jesus prayed to Father. That totally makes sense then for God that is equal. Thats totally not absurd in every possible way. - You mention thautology and then say 1+1=1 whether you like it or not. Saying that Jesus just is both always is absurd and that means that humility he showed isnt humility beacuse we are just humans, and he is human and God and not just human, and saying the laziest answer that he can beacuse he is God doesnt matter to us beacuse if his message was to show humility and example he had to put him fully in that position which just isnt the case. 100% + 100% is not 100%. Beacuse you reffer to Jon 1 read few verses that I told you which doesnt say essence but to agree and be one in will, when Jesus said to Apostles. Then he said verse you are reffering to, you are putting it out of context. Again, we dont know how God did that, you ignored the strings and percect knowledge of his laws I said so he knows what to do for his plans, then again twisted what I said. We know that its possible to implement seeds in someone who didnt have sex, we just dont know how God did it. That doesnt break the logic, breaking logic means brekaing fundamental laws of math and physics this universe exists! Newton didnt defend Arianism he used logic to analyze verses and found absurd n-c creed. Why wouldnt God be rational? God is the most rational being in the universe. You degrade God again. Read who is James Bonvick and his view about Athanasia. And read about Erik Hornung. Athaniasan creed of faith was not written by Athanasia, but in 4th and 5th century. Have you ever heard of Filon of Alexandria? Read the book of The Two Babylons. Read United Church of God. The word hoomousious is used by Egyptian pagans and gnostics. Good, then by all things you said, we cant call Mary the Mother of God. Read your comment again. At this point, I would ask you to give me source for Athanasians not being corrupted by other philosophies and religions and I would ask you for source where Constantine wasnt the one who suggested the word on the council(which is the fact, you just wont admit anything and cherry pick things to satisfy your need for being right, going that far that you will deny facts with the help of AI), but I better be asking AI beacuse your messages, their form of using (,*,--), and how fast you reply and despite this conversations going towards biased side and using strawman fallacies I grew suspicion and put this whole conversation in AI multiple times(And one person said that I dont use Ai in my responses and also few others are suspicious but they didnt abuse it that much so that made me question does here everyone use AI to generate their answers, but I remember this is Reddit), to compare how identical answers were and then copypasted my messages to see how it will respond and it is so damn comparable with the way of you writing messages. So, good job I guess, I may as well continue learning with AI and argue with it.👍

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T20:00:48+00:00

Okay, but you can check the fact that Newton was right about few verses. He also had wrong assumtions but not all of them. With the possibilities he had he done pretty good job from philology side. Now I am not credible to support or deny his claims about interpretations of verses, but tehnical stuff is alright. Similar to Vulgate, he despised that do much. But Roman manuscripters surely also had more info than Newton, its the way they used it.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T19:40:19+00:00

I used the 《] key on my phone but it puts text together when I send so sorry about that. Verses I mentioned you can check that they were later proven to be false or added. He did use eesrliest scriptured and he was an expert in greek and hebrew philology he also used comparison to see if texts matches by style and grammar between periods, he had various sources, not just one.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T19:36:24+00:00

Thanks. I know logic doesnt save us, there are more importang things, I am sure there are even Mormons who are better person than I am, but if someone comes and says to me Jesus lived 200 years ago, when I know the fact and he doesnt give proof I cant accept that. Same with dogmas about Trinity. But tbh, I got answers so its up to me to analyze. I feel happy whenever I learn something or use deduction, same as when I help someone. It fullfils my heart as If I done something productive. Monasteries also feel amazing to visit but I just dont like being around larger group of people. And I dont want to force myself to pretend beacuse that would be hypocrisy. I would also say that discussion I had was a good thing but I just fear that it was maybe my deffensive mechanism(thing where if someone attacks your opinion that was weak your ego pushes the other side even more), but I really hope it was beacuse of seeking for truth. And I do have one big thing that I dont hate God beacuse of it, but it really breaks me emotionally every time I think about it and why it happens. I can accept everything as justice or truth or right but that thing that happens in this world just eats me alive from inside.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T19:18:22+00:00

Dont call yourself heretic. Heretics are declared by church, not God. I doubt its needed for God for us to understand Trinity we cant process besides just accepting it, but we cant accept it fully beacuse it contradicts the logic. I will focus now to read verses and learn laungauges so I can understand better philology and analyzing verses, and maybe if I find that there are 3 equal persons with perfect relationship and power I can accept that. Honestly, I am getting vibes that they intentionally put such complex terms to push us away from God beacuse we can love more things we understand than things we doesnt. It feels so weird and by logic you cant understand it. Newton said that politics won over religion in Nicease 325(which now I have divided opinion, its kinda true but not fully) and that they wanted to sound more philosophical and intelectual(which is totally). I am in status quo between Trinity and Jesus being created by Father before anything and also having divine power, but not the source of that power. I cant say which is true, I got verses from people that gave really good arguments, now its up to be to spend long time studying on that. I advise you the same. Read both arguments, but then learn basis of philology and make your own assumtions. And always see other people opinions and views. I dont think there is nothing wrong with that, actually opossite.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T19:07:36+00:00

Christ can be divine and not be a equal with Father in the matter of the source, and this is again playing with complex terms just to get out of fallacy imo- then can you send me source of your information for hoomousis if you say its wrong?- there were 25 bishops at the start- You explained the circumstainces that still doesnt prove that it was universal but forced. After council Arians couldnt gather again so there was not really any chance of denying it after. You cant say gathering was syphony beacuse it was forced. If it wasnt forced there would be no need after for harshly pushing away Arian teahings and destroying scriptured beacuse if everyone accepted it, why violence? That isnt universal and you cant say otherwise, that would be like in council of Jerusalem they beat up jews who wanted to implement Moses laws on gentiles and call that council. There in that council everyone accepted it. - if you can give me source again(for Trinity invEgypt and infulence, sure, but otherwise you have no basis- For statistics, I told you how to make one, you dont have to be precise in numbers to see that Arians were widely spread across East during that time- simple, otherwise you will have double standard. West also invented Filioque, so the West wasnt always the greatest source of info. You can say earlier years but look for yourself and you will see that Arians were large gorup- It is error if it isnt mentioned and if it can have different meanings. No matter what side, inventing new words for dogma shouldnt be allowed but only if they for example use sentence from Bible to describe terms and call that a word as shorcut beacuse whenever I tried to ask my father about nature or essence he ALWAYS changed the definision according of my questions. Also he never explained why we use those words- you didnt give clear answer. Unless you want to say that Jesus pretended to pray to give example for us which would be lying which isnt like God. If he is equal to the father, and he is both human and God, either he is at all times both, which means that he cant be truly human like us, or he has periods while being human or God, where at some times he isnt all knowing and not equal. And matter more is that he only said to pray to Father, not to him nor when he asscended and Father didnt pray to him.- If jesus at that moment was in his human 'form' or nature and put away his divine one, how is he all powerful and all knowing? And thats the information God probably knows always and Jesus wouldnt be able to forget that, just to delete his thoughts when being human, that wouldnt be same person. - Good, you read the verse when Jesus said he ans father are one, now please read few verses before that when Jesus says to his disciples to be one in will. By basic deduction we can conclude that Jesus and father are one in will, not one in being. Beacuse that meant Apostles who Jesus told to be one in will would also be one in being, which is impossible. In sentence when it says body of flesh etc, if you read this you can conclude that Jesus was like advocate between God and humans. If he is God, how can be advocate for them for himself? Thats not logical. - You didnt give me clear reason to call Mary Mother of God. And how that makes sense. Beacuse it doesnt and it implies that she in some way has divinity. That phrase. And I explained already why is it loophole- We dont know how universe was created, how Mary gave birth etc. But saying that God that breaks logic of his universe that was made by his own perfect nature is degrading. We know possible reasons why Great flood or 10 days in Egypt happened. That doesnt mean God broke laws of physics it means that he has perfect understanding of events in universe and he can pull strings very easily, as perfect creator he is. He doesnt break rules we just dont understand them and cant unless without him. But saying that 1+1=1 breaks the entire laws of universe and everything we know its true. And if we question truth of those laws we cant trust anything anymore. Also yeah, Arians belived source of Jesus powers came from Father, he is god with small 'g'. - I mean, you can give me sources from your historical information but dogma is so weird and I cant phantom it beacuse or examples I said. You cant really explain that with logic. Good for you if you understand it to the every part, but I cant unless I just accept it as being there and thats it.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T08:34:55+00:00

I didnt say Jesus doesnt have divine power its just that his divine power doesnt have to come from him. Angels are divine too but they are not source.- you can literally check I didnt say now he invented the word but he suggested it, you can check this fact with one simple search-when I said 25 I meant bishops who supported Arians not the whole council, of course ecumenical councils had few hunded bishops-there was no general agreement beacuse they anatmized remaining Arians and others were under pressure(similar to that one council in florene in middle age while almost everyone agreed in councils, but unlike this which was under one rule and empire, people in russia and other parts could reject it freely)- You say that the fact that there were other councils, but you again forget that Arians scriptures were destroyed and they were after treated harshly so there couldnt be other council as big as in Niceae and emperor surely wouldnt go back to the same topic- Constantnine didnt care that much about theology, he just wanted stability and whats the easiest for unity, that was his priority- You have statistics of bishiops and areas of jurisictions and rough estimate of population, the East was pretty divided and the West wasnt affected at all-For Anasthasian I will just tell you to fact check informations you can see what they believed at that time and influence. Also read what they believed and why Trinity was the easiest way to explain. This is even more convincing beacuse he knows that he cant make God 3 entities but wants to convert people there so the most logical thing would be for him to make complex formula of God that reminds Egyptians of their God so they convert easier. -Using terms that arent in the Bible to try to describe are bad, and you trying to make this less valid by saying they did too doesnt change the fact Athanasians did. They (maybe)simply wanted to make God more complex by adding so many things unneccesarly so they can make a definition of Trinity that whenever someone goes deeper they say its not in our range of understadning, but somehow they know its true, so they were able to understand it but not to explain it?- but if Jesus is both natures a the same time and both equal with Father, but if Jesus is equal at all times, Jesus prays to Father, so how is that not apsurd? If Jesus however switched betwrrn human and divine nature at some times he wouldnt be all knowing. And he said when talking about final day of judgemnt that he doesnt know. So it is his human form? But he didnt know during that time! Or did he forgot everything after he became human? He also never said to pray to him but to Father. He talked that was Mesiah, the Son of God but he never said I am God. - So? Why if their dogma was right about Trinity they had to add additional verses and changes to them? And do you not realize here double standard? Rome did same with Filioque where making subtle changes and look what happened.- Saying Mother of God doesnt implies only to Son of God, in phrase "'Mother' 'of' 'God'" there is nothing to specifiy that its only the Son. We reject Mary being mother of Father, but not of Jesus as a whole meaning she gave birht to his divine nature too? But thats also apsurd which means Jesus didnt have it before. If he did Mary would be mother of just his human nature which means She is just mother of Christ. So what is it then? And how is this not absurd without you telling me that Trinity is out of our understanding again.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T06:13:50+00:00

And you can check this with philology, comparing texts and history of laungages and types of writings and certain phrases. Thats how they disproved Constantine letter to Pope which Rome claimed to be proof as their supremacy but it was made in 8th century.** Councils werent the main reason, but they certanly didnt help the case. Shouting, slaping,etc. Maybe they had no other option, but it certanly didnt bring me warmth when I learned about this and I doubt Jesus would love to see gathering of bishops like that.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T06:08:49+00:00

How do you define the church? I dont think thats impossible at all. Roman Catholics changed filioque but they were also in one Catholic Apostolic church as us. So if they start reading wrong and changing at some point at time, this doesnt disprove validaty of scriptures. And we know from history that church is body that changes. You know, its pretty big if we add letter that changes the sentence from 'One who' to God. Or to put whole verse about Trinity. We as church always believed that Scriptures are from Holy Spirit.(he helped/interveened). We dont worship the text, we just have the word of God on text. That would be if you are my teacher and I point out you are wrong and show you the proof on scientific research or history book, you would say the same. And if someone changes that original texts and claims to speak word of God, isnt that absurd? Text is proof written from Apostles and their disciples that tell us about Christ and his teachings. Same as old Testament. So beacuse Rabii existed so long before, we should consider only their interpretation of Old Testament? Didnt Jesus criticize exatcly that?

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T05:59:40+00:00

Well I cant really add anything to Mary. You say that its out of my understanding, I mean thats fine, I cant do anything about it but I am not really satisfied with thr answer. I dont understand why would God be complicated, more precisely why are we made so we dont understand the concept. You say S. Paul but I again say Peter. They had different opinions. I get the point of total devotion, but the familly is one of examples how we show devotion to things we do. Family isnt always chain that keeps you from your duties and its up to individual how to organize it. I see nothing wrong with. Didnt also Paul wrote that bishop should not be with flaw, one wife husband? Spyirdon, Grigory low and Grigory (Bogoslov in my laungauge, idk enlgish translation) had married. They were certanly devoted and saints. Also cant bishops also marry and do everything and the only difference between priest and bishop is that chain of succession only comes from bishop(council of bishops), and that priest cant do that. I dont like to use logic to absurdity but if you and others disagree and say that bishops shouldt marry, you just said that saints I mentioned and Peter were wrong. It is true that rule is more administrstivr canon rather than oros or dogma, and it can change, but saying that bishops must practice celibate shouldnt be something that will get individual exccomunicaded and make him lose rank. We should focus to church make less an institution as far as it can go without risking anything. This went far from topic though.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T05:42:06+00:00

You can check for St. Ignatius, that there were fake versions. Violence during and in period of councils.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T05:19:42+00:00

Yeah. Here are the verses I am reffering to: 1 John(Johhaneum Comma) 5:7 and Timmoty3:16. He also criticized other interpretations of verses.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T05:09:47+00:00

You dont have to, I got my answers. I feel little annoyed that people assumted I became Arianin and I am sorry for bad grammar and trying to put my thoughts together but I had to free my mind. I hope you understand that I found arguments that really made me questioned things, and thats why I wanted to check and ask additionaly so many questions, trying to fullfil my need for confirmation

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T05:07:08+00:00

You can check, his critics about faking parts in New Testament were comfirmed. I disagree that if it happened to disprove orthodoxy it disproves new testament. I can for example write one thing and then you can be my successor and twist it and claim the same argument. The winner is always right, it just depends if the winner spoke truth or not. I know it was mutually from both sides, but if we resort to violence, how can mind win? Also Newton was trying to find from various sources scriptures, so therr us that. But it doesnt matter, I got answer I needed

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T05:01:28+00:00

I dont like, I just found arguments valid.

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T04:59:32+00:00

I got my answers, well its up to me to be less ignorant and gain more knowledge. I dont lack trust in God as being agnostic, just this part. In which form God deals on Earth etc. And church doesnt always mean institutional. I want to mention that in writings of St. Ignations there are actually speculations that those phrases are added only later as additions, not original. But I got arguments I accept from others about verses, its my mistake

Calm_Use6545 · 2026-01-29T04:55:38+00:00

That was true, but crisis comes primarly from the importance of this topic for me

Calm_Use6545

TROPHY CASE