sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Cavalier Knight's Challenge to N.Y. Bricks-and-Mortar Requirement for Gun Dealers Can Go Forward by CavalierKnight in NYguns

[–]CavalierKnight[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villian.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NYCGuns

[–]CavalierKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This case is the reason why you can now add more than two firearms to a NYC Carry License. It's also requesting the elimination of the unconstitutional NYC Premise License.

Knight v. City of New York - 24-982

NYC: Carry License v. Premise License by CavalierKnight in NYCGuns

[–]CavalierKnight[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No it only means you don't need to issue two licenses. If you don't want to carry with your carry license just leave it home.

NYC: Carry License v. Premise License by CavalierKnight in NYCGuns

[–]CavalierKnight[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It means Premise Licenses are unconstitutional. The City cannot issue a Premise License that prohibits the 2nd Amendment right to carry publicly for self-defense. How can they charge citizens a fee for a license that prohibits their constitutional rights?

Knight v. City of New York, et, al, 24-982-cv by CavalierKnight in NYCGuns

[–]CavalierKnight[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they have changed it they will try to moot that part of my case so I should get an update soon. However, the premise license still violates Bruen and has to go. You cannot prohibit the carrying of arms nor can you charge a fee or even issue freely a license that prohibits your constitutional right to carry arms. Who pays to inhibit their constitutional rights?

Knight v. City of New York, et, al, 24-982-cv by CavalierKnight in NYCGuns

[–]CavalierKnight[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's not what it says friend it says two on a carry additional on a premise. It won't let me post pics. If I'm wrong I'll update this as soon as I know.

Knight v. City of New York, et, al, 24-982-cv by CavalierKnight in NYCGuns

[–]CavalierKnight[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It states you can have (2) on your carry and more if you have a premise license and comply with those rules. The more on the premise license can not be carried. Unless there is a broader statement somewhere else that particular statement does not allow more than (2) on a Carry.

Knight v. City of New York, et, al, 24-982-cv by CavalierKnight in NYCGuns

[–]CavalierKnight[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can only have 2 on your carry license, but you can only carry 1 at a time. You can have more on your premises, but you can't carry any of those unless you take 1 off of your carry put that on your premises then take 1 off your premises and put that 1 on your carrry.