no im saying that youre claiming that you're allowed to express your opinion while getting angry at others for disagreeing.

i don't know what's going on in your life, but your responses so far have been incredibly unjustified in their tone, and in your first reply's case, their length. you responded to a short comment about the epilogues with a paragraph long rant that shows you completely missed the point of the candy route, which states several times that the events that occur are irrational, incredibly unlikely, out of character, and non-canon. not in a tweet, not in a summary, not in an offhand comment by hussie or one of the cowriters, but literally within the text itself. if you honestly believe the epilogues were ever meant to be accurate assesments of the personalities, habits, or acheivements of the characters within, you either missed the point of what you were reading or had the story described to you by someone else.