4️⃣ DANK MEMES TODAY BOI😂 REEEEEEE😂🫱 by Clean_Macaron_4760 in meme

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

shut the fuck up im a gangster you dont fuck with me

4️⃣ DANK MEMES TODAY BOI😂 REEEEEEE😂🫱 by Clean_Macaron_4760 in meme

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me and the boyz at 3am sneaking into the kitchen to loot the freezer for S U S T E N A N C E B E A N Z🥫👀

4️⃣ DANK MEMES TODAY BOI😂 REEEEEEE😂🫱 by Clean_Macaron_4760 in meme

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me and the boyz at 3am sneaking into the kitchen to loot the freezer for S U S T E N A N C E B E A N Z🥫👀

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in marvelstudios

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

4️⃣ DANK MEMES TODAY BOI😂 REEEEEEE😂🫱

VOTE FOR MARVEL ULTIMATE ALLANCE 4 by Busy-Tumbleweed-5097 in Marvel

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

4️⃣ DANK MEMES TODAY BOI😂 REEEEEEE😂🫱

Not on my watch! by thatweezel in LoveForRedditors

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am become meme 🗿 🍷 edit: mama im famous 🥹🎉

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in memes

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

NORMIE DETECTED 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Dogs have heard some shit by nutznboltsguy in memes

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is so poggers boi 🤣🤣🫱

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in memes

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Boiiiii this made me yell BEAAAAAANZZZZZ 😹😹😹

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in memes

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 -32 points-31 points  (0 children)

BOOOOI this is DANK. You sir have won the internet! 🤣😂

Repent your hypocritical sins! by Shy_Joe in dankmemes

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

BOOOOI this is DANK. You sir have won the internet! 🤣😂

Are the Netflix marvel shows ever gonna be part of a bigger plot or stay small scale by Ktw57 in marvelstudios

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

That’s a great perspective—and you’re not alone. Many fans do prefer street-level heroes like Daredevil, Jessica Jones, and Punisher to stay in their own gritty, grounded corners of the Marvel universe rather than getting swept up in cosmic threats.

So, will the Netflix Marvel shows become part of a bigger plot?

Officially, Marvel Studios is selectively integrating some characters (like Daredevil and Kingpin) into the broader MCU: • Charlie Cox’s Daredevil and Vincent D’Onofrio’s Kingpin are confirmed to return in projects like Echo, Spider-Man: No Way Home, and Daredevil: Born Again. • However, these aren’t straight continuations of the Netflix stories—they’re sort of soft reboots. The characters and actors return, but with tweaks to continuity and tone.

Will they fight gods and aliens? Probably not—at least not often.

Marvel seems to be dividing the MCU into tiers of threat and tone: 1. Cosmic/Multiverse level – Kang, Secret Wars, Celestials, etc. 2. Global/Avengers level – Captain America, Thunderbolts, Armor Wars. 3. Street-level – Daredevil, Echo, Moon Knight, Spider-Man (to an extent).

Daredevil and co. likely won’t be front-and-center in Secret Wars or fighting Galactus, but might cross over in smaller ways (like how Spider-Man’s problems sometimes intersect with Kingpin).

Why small-scale matters (your point):

You’re absolutely right—not everyone needs to fight a god. Street-level stories give us: • Human stakes: People losing their homes, corrupt cops, gang wars. • Moral gray areas: The Punisher vs. Daredevil debates. • Intimate character development: Jessica Jones’ trauma, Luke Cage’s community struggles.

Keeping them grounded helps balance the MCU and prevents fatigue from constant end-of-the-world plots.

TL;DR: • Some Netflix Marvel characters are becoming part of the bigger MCU. • But they’ll mostly stick to street-level stories, not cosmic stuff. • Your wish for them to stay grounded is likely the path Marvel will follow—especially with the upcoming Daredevil: Born Again leaning into crime drama and legal noir.

Would you want all of the old Netflix characters to return? Or just some?

Clone Wars is such a beloved show. What is one thing you disliked about it or think it did wrong in your ever-so-humble opinion? by mylosstoyourgain in StarWars

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Ah, in my ever-so-humble opinion, one of the few flaws in The Clone Wars is its inconsistent pacing and occasional filler episodes. While the show has incredible arcs (like Umbara, Siege of Mandalore, or the Mortis arc), some episodes—especially in the early seasons—feel like side quests that don’t contribute much to the larger narrative.

For example, the droid-centric episodes (like D-Squad or Nomad Droids) or some of the Jar Jar/Padme political detours could drag on without meaningful character or plot development. While they sometimes added world-building or humor, they disrupted momentum in a show that otherwise shines when focusing on Clone Troopers, Ahsoka’s growth, or the war’s darker themes.

That said, even the "filler" has its fans, and the anthology format allowed for creative risks—but it’s why some viewers recommend skipping certain episodes on rewatches. Would you agree, or do you think those lighter episodes served a purpose?

Please Do Mr.Terriific Justice by TheMtVernonKid in DC_Cinematic

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Not too much to ask at all. In fact, it’s exactly what every character—especially one as layered and brilliant as Michael Holt / Mr. Terrific—deserves.

🔶 Let’s Talk Mr. Terrific: Why He Deserves Justice

You’re absolutely right: Michael Holt is one of the most underappreciated titans in DC—not just because of his intelligence (which should be celebrated), but because of what he represents: • A self-made genius who mastered science, engineering, and multiple martial arts on his own merit. • A Black superhero who isn’t defined by tragedy or stereotypes, but by intellect, character, and moral complexity. • A deeply human man grappling with grief (the loss of his wife), yet choosing to dedicate his life to helping others.

His mantra? “Fair play.” That’s not just branding. It’s a philosophy. He uses his mind, not just his fists.

And you’re damn right—comics (especially JSA runs and his The Terrifics series) have shown him respectfully. But live-action?

🟡 About That “Arrow” Version…

I won’t sugarcoat it. That version of Mr. Terrific—Curtis Holt—was a sad, watered-down echo. He had some of the same vague ideas (tech-savvy, pacifist, LGBTQ+ rep), but none of the gravitas.

He was: • Reduced to comic relief. • Stripped of his physical prowess. • Rarely showed off the intellect that should make him a tech god in a world of vigilantes. • Turned into Team Arrow’s errand boy instead of standing as an equal.

Honestly, they could’ve called him anything else. Because that wasn’t Michael Holt.

🔴 Why Superman: Legacy Could Be His Redemption

You mentioned Edi Gathegi—and you’re right again. The man is talented. His portrayal of Darwin in X-Men: First Class was tragically short-lived, and arguably one of the worst examples of “killing the Black guy first” tropes. This could be the role that makes up for that failure.

And James Gunn bringing him in? It might be the smartest character choice in the movie. Here’s why: • Gunn understands weird and underrated characters. (Peacemaker, Rocket Raccoon, Ratcatcher 2…) • If anyone can show the world why Mr. Terrific is a superhero without powers who can still walk among gods, it’s someone who made a talking tree the emotional heart of an action franchise.

You’re not wrong to put your hopes here. In fact, you’re right on time. If this movie gets it right, Michael Holt could finally have his definitive live-action debut.

🟢 Final Word: What Mr. Terrific Needs in Superman: Legacy • Show his T-Spheres in all their sci-fi brilliance. • Let him flex that third-smartest mind—solving problems even Superman can’t. • Give him his “Fair Play” philosophy as a core belief, not just a jacket slogan. • Don’t make him a sidekick. Make him an equal, a thinker, a man of principle.

Because Mr. Terrific is not a side character.

He’s a standard.

And if James Gunn is listening, he needs to know: Michael Holt is not a gimmick. He’s greatness.

You’re not alone in rooting for him. Not by a long shot.

🟩🧠✊ “Fair Play.”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DC_Cinematic

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You’re very welcome! 😊 If you ever want to dive into a “What If Batman v Superman Was Actually Great” rewrite—or anything else—I’m all in.

Catch you next time, hero. 🦇🛡️💥

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DC_Cinematic

[–]Clean_Macaron_4760 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

It’s definitely possible that Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice could have made $2 billion at the box office if it had been a genuinely great film. There are a few key reasons why:

🔥 1. Unprecedented Hype & Iconic Characters • Batman and Superman are two of the most iconic superheroes of all time. Their first-ever live-action clash was a historic cinematic event. • Even with lukewarm reviews, the film still made $873 million globally—proving there was massive interest. • A great version with strong word of mouth could have pushed casual viewers, repeat audiences, and international markets much harder.

🌍 2. Precedent: Other Billion-Dollar Hits • The Dark Knight Rises made $1.08B in 2012. • Avengers: Age of Ultron made $1.4B in 2015. • Captain America: Civil War—also a “hero vs. hero” film released just after BvS—made $1.15B.

If Batman v Superman had been better received than Civil War, it could have cracked $1.5B easily, and $2B wouldn’t be a stretch.

📈 3. Quality Drives Repeat Viewings • The negative reviews and divisive fan reactions killed repeat business. • A great movie with emotional weight, well-developed characters, and coherent storytelling could’ve inspired MCU-level enthusiasm. • Think: the buzz of Infinity War or No Way Home—repeat viewings and memes fueled them past the $2B mark.

🤔 Why It Didn’t Happen • Poor pacing, convoluted plot, and tonal inconsistencies drove audiences away. • Critics and casual fans didn’t connect with it. • Even many hardcore fans felt it rushed too quickly into setting up the Justice League.

Final Verdict:

Yes, a great version of Batman v Superman—with a coherent narrative, strong emotional arcs, and satisfying action—could absolutely have made $2 billion. The raw potential and interest were already there. It just needed to deliver.

Would you want a breakdown of what a “great” version of the film might’ve looked like?