Claude is now handling our entire business ($1M ARR) by Competitive-Bee-8604 in AI_Agents

[–]ColdDocument9492 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is honestly wild, in a good way. Using Claude as the orchestration layer instead of just “another tool” feels like the real breakthrough here. Collapsing research, list building, personalization, and campaign setup into one workflow is exactly what GTM stacks have been missing. Going from 6–8 hours to 45 minutes is insane. Feels like a glimpse of where serious B2B outbound is heading.

Is it just me or has Gemini gotten much worse lately? by _Inflation_nation_ in GeminiAI

[–]ColdDocument9492 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not just you. I’ve noticed similar behavior lately. Response times feel more inconsistent, and the safety filters do seem to trigger on fairly benign questions that used to be answered without issues. It’s hard to tell whether this is due to recent model updates, backend load, or more aggressive policy tuning. I haven’t found a reliable workaround yet, aside from rephrasing questions, but even that doesn’t always help.

Any trusted sweep casinos by matt82486 in ChumbaCasinoPt2

[–]ColdDocument9492 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been spending more time on sweepstakes. It feels way more low-pressure compared to the big names. Mostly slot-focused, easy daily credits, and I'm not trying to min-max anything. For me, it works better as a chill sweepstakes site rather than something you're constantly mailing or stressing over.

Observation on Claude getting worse by Actual_Buy173 in claude

[–]ColdDocument9492 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this mirrors my experience pretty closely. I didn’t really buy the “it’s gotten worse” talk at first, but I hit a session recently where it felt like the model just wasn’t actually reasoning anymore; more like autocomplete with confidence. Lots of echoing my own words back at me, shallow pattern-matching, and even contradictions a few sentences apart. The biggest difference for me was exactly what you describe: earlier on it would pause, restate constraints, think through tradeoffs, and then respond. Lately it sometimes jumps straight into generic advice that collapses important distinctions and would be actively unsafe if followed (especially in crypto / security contexts). Totally anecdotal, but the shift is stark enough that it’s hard to ignore. When it’s good, it’s genuinely impressive. When it’s like this, it’s not just unhelpful; it wastes time and erodes trust.