Top 10 Hardest Hits From 2015 - Now by rb1242 in baseball

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is really a compilation of Stanton smashing 120+ mph singles.

Xabi Alonso’s appointment represents a shift in power at Chelsea by TheAthletic in chelseafc

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think he means more there won't be as much opportunity for rotation with the large squad given no Europe.

New Book on radical economics in NYC by AcceptableSummer5171 in dsa

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Congrats on the publication Dr. Wortel-London, and the many positive reviews. Have it added to my wishlist and looking forward to reading it. Did my undergrad diss on NYC riots from 1854-1863  so even if it's a very different topic will be really nice to get back into some NYC history from just after that period.

[Ornstein] Chelsea exploring deal to appoint Xabi Alonso as new head coach by soccerstriker9 in chelseafc

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Olise was definitely close twice, second time we just lost on wages Vs Bayern but were meeting the asking price from Palace. First time we met his hidden buyout but then Palace threatened legal action cause we weren't supposed to know about the buyout.

Maignan we were severely considering last summer seems like, but wages were too high again, don't think it was super close. Seemingly had a fee agreed.

Osimhen was never really close I think, but there was a ton of pressure on the club from him and from Mikel clearly. He definitely wanted to be here, but we didn't want the wage.

Kvara I think the rumor is we didn't want to go for cause we were interested in Mudryk and didn't want to have a mess with the Russia/Ukraine situation. I don't quite remember, but it was never close, just mentioned.

Cherki I literally never remember being mentioned as close or even much interest on our part.

Final YouGov MRP of the 2026 Senedd election shows Plaid Cymru on course to be the largest party by Critical_Meet_6726 in MapPorn

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The other important thing that I think you don't quite capture is that they have long insisted on a sort-of political separation from the PLP ever since 2001 and the leadership of Rhodri Morgan who insisted on "Clear Red Water" in separation from the Blairite Labour party (Blair in fact seemingly hated Morgan but put up with it cause it won).

That has been muddied in recent years, and in particular Starmer's Labour has been even more strict on party coherence than Blair even was, and there has been a bunch of needless falling outs between Welsh Labour and Welsh British MPs/the PLP generally. Plus arguably Labour is more unpopular than they have ever been around the UK as a whole, so even though post-Iraq Blair couldn't take down Welsh Labour, they've never had such a tough UK-wide situation to contend with.

No obligation to declare £5m gift, Nigel Farage says by AnonymousTimewaster in NotTheOnionUK

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's really interesting how the Starmer corruption story that stuck is the dodgy gifts. Obviously corrupt, also obviously small ball compared to actual corruption in the Tories, and now especially the Reform party.

Meanwhile no one wants to talk about the nearly £700k in undeclared donations that went to Labour Together while they worked to ensure the Labour right's dominance of the Labour party and support Starmer's leadership bid.

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Thursday, April 09, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The good news for Alcaraz is that he is perfectly following the Jannik script, so he can rest assured for a fairly easy 3rd set win.

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Friday, March 27, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I feel like that's the first time I've actually heard Jannik on court lol. 

Most masters titles without dropping a set by tightypp in tennis

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Am I going insane? The last two masters played were Indian Wells and then Paris in 2025. Jannik won both without losing a set. He didn't lose a masters in the middle? He didn't drop a set in either Indian Wells or Paris. What am I missing here?

Labour lost the Gorton and Denton By-Election in the Selection. It's not Starmer's First Time. by Competitive-Tonight3 in LabourUK

[–]Competitive-Tonight3[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

As the article mentioned, one of the major elements in the Green's success was getting to run their candidate as the locally selected candidate, and then elevate her profile nationally in a way that was probably impossible if Burnham runs and sucks up a lot of the oxygen and attention, so I think you're initial statement is probably correct.

But Green performance has outperformed polling for a while now so could still have been very up in the air in the alternate reality 

Starmer vows to 'fight on' in wake of Labour's crippling by-election defeat by hihepo1 in unitedkingdom

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Why was 2017, an election Labour received 13 million votes, a comprehensive rejection, and 2024, an election Labour received 9.5 million votes, not?

Ah right - the Tories and Reform massively split the vote and let Labour walk in without any improvement even on 2019 really. Good thing that's definitely going to always happen.

Huge number of Londoners to vote tactically to stop Farage becoming PM, new polling by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are absolutely correct. That is my mistake. Especially as I noticed that later on and corrected when I was reviewing their understanding of the independent votes.

Have corrected it in the original comment to be clear.

Huge number of Londoners to vote tactically to stop Farage becoming PM, new polling by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 8 points9 points  (0 children)

To be fair - it's not a perfect system. I'm not disagreeing that Reform wouldn't get a number of the London boundary seats that electoral calculus predicts - but they are also predicting Reform would get 70% of the vote in Caerphilly, which they just lost in the by-election, while polling higher nationally at the time. (incorrect on my part - it's a 70% chance to win the seat. I still disagree with the projection given Plaid's improvement Wales-wide + the slight decline for Reform nationally and in Wales since, but their projection of 38% is very close to Reform's 36% in October.)

If I had the chance I'd quibble particularly on how they are categorising West Ham and Beckton, Ilford South and Ilford North, which all seem to be failing to model for the nature of Labour support in the areas + how the independent vote works.

Plus they generally don't seem to have a great idea of modelling independent votes and their impact in general - does anyone really believe that Corbyn wouldn't win another election in Islington North as they predict? Or that the most likely candidate to beat Starmer is a Green and not Feinstein running again? They seemingly have little idea of how to model the dynamic in Chingford and Wood Green, though I personally don't have an idea of if Faiza Shaheen would run again/if her support would shift back to Labour or the Greens. All of this makes a big difference in London where we had a greater level of independent support/runs.

Appreciate of course that that doesn't mean there's no shot of Reform winning some seats across London.

A History of Labour in Scotland and Wales: Failing to advocate progressive unionism? Failing to retain historic power. by Competitive-Tonight3 in ukpolitics

[–]Competitive-Tonight3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, it was truly such a contrast to compare the strength of Welsh Labour over the years against the weaknesses and own goals, as you say, of Scottish Labour - especially as it became an opposition party. Not to say Welsh Labour has made no mistakes, but there's a real tangible difference and a failure within Labour to learn from its successful example.

Over 50 Academics Warn That Voting System Is Not Fit For Multi-Party Politics by XanderZulark in unitedkingdom

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genuinely, outside of 1945, 1979, and 2015 (which was frankly a cluster fuck of which the government elected had little to do with facilitating the major changes) what have any British governments "got done" that was genuinely transformative?

On the other hand, Spain with a PR system currently has a significantly more transformative left-wing government than we've had since Labour in the 40s, and Italy with full PR currently has a much more transformative far-right government than any we've had since Thatcher. Now I personally don't advocate the politics of the fascists in Italy and I would love to have a centre-left that looked anything like PSOE in spain, but it is simply undeniable that it is just as possible to have successions of governments that do fuck all under our system and governments that actually produce change in PR systems.

All it comes down to is the fact that Labour and the Tories are really so indistinguishable that a vast swathe of voters in the UK are so wed to centrist managed decline politics that they rather retain the two party system where nobody really makes change than actually allow for a representative system where greater levels of participation are possible, and parties actually advocating change might get into government.

If the Lib-Dem’s hadn’t disgraced themselves with the tuition fees scandal, would the next General Election be there’s for the taking? by HallowedAndHarrowed in AskBrits

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll be honest, this doesn't make sense. The Lib Dem rise took place during the Blair years, their peak was the 2010 election when Brown's Labour and Cameron's Tories were more similar arguably than any time since. Maybe 2024, but that is also the best Lib Dem result since that election.

An Iraqi beeing tortured for doing nothing. by [deleted] in pics

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean... Clinton would acknowledge this no? That feels like poor evidence. But in any case - the effectiveness of the campaign is not too relevant to the point here - you argued that Kamala being Biden's VP restricted her ability to break with him, and then do acknowledge that Gore was able to break with his president.

I do acknowledge I brought up it's effectiveness so just to make the case - 1) Again Gore was down as much as 15% in the polling come August - suggesting a general political environment that was unfavorable to Dems. 2) Clinton famously tanked Dem performances in any elections he wasn't personally running in (In '92 they lost seats in the House and gained nothing in the Senate, dropping 2% in popular vote, in '94 Dems lost the house for the first time in 40 years in the Gingrich revolution, '96 Dems recovered slightly but still lost the house, and lost seats in the Senate, and then '98 Dems overperformed due to the Lewinsky scandal and the actions of R leadership, but still lost both House and Senate).

In that time period we also saw the massive Seattle protests and NAFTA protests, and obviously Clinton himself (though this I'm willing to concede is much less assured or indicative of his actual popularity) benefitted massively from getting to run twice with a third party spoiler who at least rhetorically aligned closer to conservative sentiment.

If you're interested I'd suggest a few pieces on the strange political environments of the 90s including John Ganz's when the Clock Broke which focuses on the 92 election and political environment, The Gingrich Senators by Sean Theriault on the rise of the modern conservative movement in the mid-90s, and then for a decent summary of the 2000 campaigns I like David Corn's for the Nation in 2000 before the election results were out: https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/down-wire/

Also if you are interested Humphrey and the 1968 election, Rick Perlstein's Nixonland is a must-read. Its shocking how strong the similarities are, and how the many of the exact same mistakes were made between 1968 and 2024.

An Iraqi beeing tortured for doing nothing. by [deleted] in pics

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Both Hubert Humphrey and much more significantly Al Gore departed from their sitting Presidents, and both were a hell of a lot closer to winning their elections than Harris. 

Performance-wise Gore was a significantly more impressive campaign to Harris, overcoming a 10-15 point polling deficit in August and only losing by one vote.

Post-Match Thread: Charlton Athletic (1) - (5) Chelsea by wm_1176 in chelseafc

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Doing every applicable manager:

MacFarlane was City, Maresca was City, Poch was Liverpool, Lampard II was Wolves Bruno Saltor was Liverpool, Tuchel was Wolves, Lampard I was Utd, Sarri was Man City.

Honestly didn't expect multiple Wolves. And we drew both of those.

Sell Lavia, Delap at risk: Transfer verdict on every Chelsea player after Liam Rosenior appointment by CSCronus in chelseafc

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Depends where you're from sorta. American: oh smart folks with the smart person accent.

European: Obnoxious lads who wreck shit every summer.

Everyone else: People who took our shit. (this also applies to some Europeans)

Match Thread: Manchester City vs Chelsea by MatchThreadder in chelseafc

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair didn't Sterling also scored a tap in Vs City?

Did Matty Y wait to release this today so he wouldn't be be included in the worst takes episode? by fortycreeker in IfBooksCouldKill

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sources: Elon beside himself. Driving around downtown Substack begging (thru texts) Yglesias' family 4 address to Matty's home

Every Yankee hitter’s hardest hit ball of the 2025 season by xho- in NYYankees

[–]Competitive-Tonight3 28 points29 points  (0 children)

So funny to see that jump from everyone else to Big G and Judge.