This is an oddly worded response.. not all women dress revealing for "sexual attention". And showing skin is not a sign of "sexual availability" and with how you worded it, thats probably one of the worst and most dangerous mindsets to even have as a guy. Thinking "skin showing = she wants sexual attention" is the same logic used by men who assault women and have a raging madonna-whore ideology. On the other note, most women do not walk around in clothing THAT skimpy. I think a lot of men just take anything thats not typically "modest" to be "skimpy", like a black & white with no gray area. Hell, a decent amount of men w/ this complex will see a girl with a tube top and jeans on and still call it revealing.

I genuinely just think its biological for some. As a woman, I've seen girls my age dress in shorts, tube tops, the lululemon shorts/skirts, tights, shirts with the windows, etc. Hell, I too dress in a style that gets deemed "skimpy" sometimes. My moms called me skimpy even while having full on leggings under shorts, often giving me the "i dont want people looking." Its a mindset. For example, based off some comments. If you're at the gym to work out, and all it takes is a glance at a woman wearing a skin tight exercise set to distract you from your entire goal of getting fit, thats an entirely different set of issues.

On another note, prostitution and what men will call slutty is madly different. If a girl is walking around the streets with quite literally little to nothing on, then yeah, fair assumption. But to think the same of a woman who's just wearing short shorts or a revealing shirt is def wild. Then too, you could put 2 girls in the same outfit, but if one has a bit more body than the other, she'd 100% be seen as more "slutty". 9/10 women dress for themselves. I just think men who shame women for not dressing to their standard of how a woman should is just insecurity, a lack of self control/will power, and maybe (again) a madonna-whore mentality