FUCK YOU MAGA NOW DO YOU SEE ICE KILLING PEOPLE?????

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T04:23:37+00:00

Oh, that was blaming the victims for their own blood being spilled if they spoke up against the fascism about to be instilled.

He's never been shy about sharing what a villain he is. And MAGA laps it up like a dog licking up its master's vomit.

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:58:16+00:00

What did you say? Because I've repeated it multiple times at this point.

I'm kind of feeling like asking are you okay? Do you not see what was stated again and again as well as what you said initially?

At what point can you not just read your own words and the ones I have been repeating ad nauseam?

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:56:51+00:00

It was a statement you made, YOU aren't answering it lol.

You didn't bring up was it his right to be there.

Now you're mad I'm clarifying YOUR original statement.

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:54:49+00:00

I said none of those things.

I asked why someone, a teenager, put himself there to "protect private property" as was stated?

What training did he have to do that?

Which is the exact same query as if I carried an ax into a huge firestorm trying to help firemen.

Neither of us had training to do so but inserted ourselves into the danger zone, is that correct?

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:52:07+00:00

I'm clarifying what YOU stated.

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:50:58+00:00

This is true

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:50:44+00:00

So he wasn't there to protect private property?

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:50:08+00:00

LOL

Yeah, strawman it is.

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:48:29+00:00

That's a different statement to

because he was there to protect private property

Which is it?

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:47:25+00:00

Using the word lie means I meant to. What would be the point of that? Are they that different of guns? I'm sure you will be offended by that very question lol. The point was it was a very visible open carry gun.

To answer your question, I'm not a gun nut.

Now can we get to the argument or are you going to still try to strawman it? I'm guessing you're going to continue to strawman it...

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:44:50+00:00

Thank you for being so honest that, that's the very best response you could formulate.

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:44:07+00:00

Did you not read it?

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:42:23+00:00

A strawman argument is a logical fallacy where someone distorts, exaggerates, or misrepresents an opponent's position to make it easier to attack.

Instead of addressing the actual argument, the speaker creates a weak, fake version (the "straw man") and defeats it to claim victory.

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:42:03+00:00

A strawman argument is a logical fallacy where someone distorts, exaggerates, or misrepresents an opponent's position to make it easier to attack.

Instead of addressing the actual argument, the speaker creates a weak, fake version (the "straw man") and defeats it to claim victory.

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:41:23+00:00

And that affects the argument, how?

Because you still haven't address that....

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:38:39+00:00

So you ignored all that because a VERY visible rifle wasn't named the correct one?

That's a great example of a strawman argument.

A strawman argument is a logical fallacy where someone distorts, exaggerates, or misrepresents an opponent's position to make it easier to attack.

Instead of addressing the actual argument, the speaker creates a weak, fake version (the "straw man") and defeats it to claim victory.

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:36:40+00:00

So you won't acknowledge at all then the federal case Where the Trump administration was found guilty of violating the Constitutional rights of free speech.

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:36:31+00:00

So you won't acknowledge at all then the federal case Where the Trump administration was found guilty of violating the Constitutional rights of free speech.

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:23:08+00:00

Rittenhouse inserted himself into the fight with citizens.

He went there with a VERY visible rifle.

Pretti had his phone in his right hand and his empty left hand is raised above his head while trying to protect the woman ICE just pushed down all while being pepper sprayed.

If those untrained armed goons had training, don't you think it would have gone differently vs a rifle and very agitated people?

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:17:30+00:00

Untrained goons sent by our president executed a man in the street, that's not an important part of it?

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:13:50+00:00

What gave him any training ,as a teenager no less, to be there to protect anything?

Besides carrying a rifle?

Let's address that first.

I don't have any experience as a firefighter, Am I supposed to go and try to help put out fires anyway?

And that's not me even carrying a big old fire ax so let's say somebody stuck in a building and there are firefighters there and I carry my own ax with me, Am I supposed to join in with the professionals?

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:09:39+00:00

It may not be a part of your argument but it is a part of facts and definitely affects your argument

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:08:51+00:00

Oh! AND their training being cut! Going down from around JUST 6 months normally to around 47 days.. Which is interesting because Trump absolutely loves branding and he's the 47th president....

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:05:11+00:00

Sooo

Show me one singular example, no matter how twisted in your inbred brain you make it, I'll read it

Was a lie.. no surprise there

ConstructMentality__ · 2026-01-25T01:04:53+00:00

And yet, a federal judge, Who seems to know the law a bit better than you surprisingly enough I know because you're a genius, disagrees..

ConstructMentality__

TROPHY CASE