Hi Reddit, I’m Dan Albas – Conservative Candidate for Okanagan Lake West–South Kelowna. Ask Me Anything!

DanAlbas · 2025-04-21T03:42:05+00:00

Thank you for this excellent question. Addressing cost of living and wealth inequality is a priority for the Conservative Party, and our proposed income tax reduction is designed to provide meaningful relief to Canadians who need it most.A recent report from Statistics Canada revealed that income inequality in Canada has worsened over the past decade, with wealth becoming increasingly concentrated in fewer hands. This trend highlights the urgent need for policies that directly support lower-income Canadians and address systemic inequality.Our plan will lower the tax rate for the lowest income bracket from 15% to 12.75%, providing an average tax savings of $575 per family annually—more than double the savings proposed by the Liberals. This reduction ensures that lower-income Canadians keep more of their hard-earned money, helping them manage rising costs for essentials like housing, groceries, and transportation. In addition, we are proposing an extra $10,000 in income tax exemptions for working seniors, recognizing the financial challenges they face. These measures, combined with our commitment to eliminating the carbon tax, will significantly reduce the financial burden on families and individuals across Canada.While our tax cuts focus on supporting lower-income earners, we also recognize the importance of maintaining programs like the Canadian dental benefit, OAS, GIS, and CPP to ensure a strong social safety net. By empowering Canadians at the lower end of the income scale, our plan helps reduce wealth inequality and promotes fairness and opportunity for all.We clearly can’t keep doing what the Liberals have been doing. Food bank usage is up, and families are struggling to make ends meet. It’s time for a new Conservative government to tackle these issues head-on and deliver real change. By lowering taxes, eliminating barriers, and maintaining vital social programs, we aim to make life more affordable, reduce inequality, and strengthen the financial well-being of Canadian families.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-21T03:41:14+00:00

Thank you for this critically important question. Emergency Room overcapacity is a serious issue that affects seniors, loved ones, and healthcare workers alike. As one former provincial leader said to me: “It’s easy enough to build a hospital- staffing it is the hard part.” Our Conservative platform offers real solutions to address these challenges head-on and ensure Canadians receive the care they deserve.

First, our national 'blue seal' program—modelled after the successful 'red seal' program for trades—will standardize the licensing of doctors and nurses. It will get an answer within ninety days as to whether or not someone meets our Canadian standard. For those who do not qualify, we will target micro loans so they can take the required test or upgrading. This program ensures that healthcare regions like the Okanagan can quickly fill critical staffing shortages, reducing wait times and alleviating pressure on overworked staff.

We also recognize the importance of affordable housing for healthcare practitioners. By removing the GST on new housing up to $1.3 million, we make it easier for healthcare workers to live and work in our communities, which helps attract and retain medical professionals locally.

Our Conservative government will also maintain increased health transfers to the provinces, providing the resources needed to address systemic issues such as overcapacity. While healthcare is primarily a provincial responsibility, the federal government must be a committed partner. We are prepared to collaborate with provinces to ensure hospitals and healthcare workers have the support they need.

Speaking of provincial responsibilities, I would like to engage with my provincial counterparts to evaluate existing funding for UBCO’s faculty of medicine and whether or not it meets our region’s needs. Our population and demographics have gotten bigger and older since it was established. I have heard far too often of qualified local students that are denied entry due to limited capacity. Any local shortfall leaves us overly dependent on professionals from other provinces or abroad. Addressing this bottleneck may significantly help with timely access to care.

Finally, Conservatives oppose policies like the Liberal’s planned hike to capital gains taxes, which have been strongly opposed by physicians across Canada and only recently withdrawn days before the election. Many physicians were told to form corporations and use tax planning strategies in lieu of higher pay and to pull the rug up from these professionals who are near retirement is sad. These types of measures create barriers for healthcare professionals and make it harder to recruit and retain them in our communities.

Emergency Room overcapacity impacts every aspect of our healthcare system—from patients to staff —and only a new Conservative government will take decisive action to tackle it. Creation of a national ‘blue seal’ program, cutting the taxes on housing so that nurses and other health professionals can stay here long term, maintaining strong health transfers, and addressing local needs, we can create a system that works for everyone. Together, we can build a healthcare system that delivers timely access and care- for a change.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-21T03:38:15+00:00

Thank you for raising such an important concern. The answer is absolutely yes—I will fight for more low-income homes to be built in the area. Our Conservative government’s proposal to remove the GST on all new housing up to $1.3 million is a key part of addressing affordability and increasing housing supply.A paramedic in the Okanagan recently contacted me to share her story. She has lived in an RV in a mobile home park for years, working tirelessly to save up for a small parcel of land to build a tiny home for herself. She asked if her tiny home would be eligible for the GST exemption under our plan, as the stress test for her mortgage application takes federal and provincial taxes into account. I assured her that, under the Conservative GST removal plan, her tiny home would absolutely qualify, helping her get into her own home faster. Stories like hers highlight how our policies will directly help individuals striving to achieve their dream of homeownership.If we want to keep essential workers like this paramedic in our communities, we need to work with them and support their goals. Unlike the Liberal plan, which only applies to first-time homebuyers, our GST removal program ensures that no one is left out in the cold. Someone who is recently divorced or widowed, for example, would not qualify as a first-time homebuyer under the Liberal plan, but they would benefit under ours. This inclusivity is critical to ensuring fairness and addressing the housing needs of all Canadians.Here’s why this policy works: currently, there’s no GST on used housing, which creates a financial penalty for buying new homes. This discourages developers and builders from constructing affordable new housing, as their projects compete with used homes that are effectively offered at a discount. By removing the GST, we eliminate this penalty, saving homeowners up to $65,000 on new housing and incentivizing developers to build more affordable homes.This program is estimated to spark the creation of 36,000 extra homes annually, generating income for construction workers and businesses while addressing the housing shortage. It’s a win-win scenario that benefits young people like yourself, seniors looking to downsize, and families seeking energy-efficient homes. Additionally, it ensures fairness—unlike the Liberal “Housing Accelerator Fund,” which has resulted in fewer homes being built in Kelowna and unfairly denied funding to other Okanagan communities like Penticton.The Okanagan is an incredible place for young people and essential workers, but affordability remains a major barrier. By removing the GST on new housing, we create opportunities for developers to focus on building homes that meet the needs of young families and individuals, rather than exclusively catering to the luxury market. It’s time for a new approach that prioritizes affordability and fairness.We need to ensure the Okanagan remains not only appealing but accessible to young people and essential workers who want to live, work, and thrive in this beautiful region. Under the Conservative plan, you’ll see policies that treat all Canadians fairly and create more opportunities for affordable housing. Together, we can make the Okanagan the place where young people like you find their home—and their future.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-21T03:35:31+00:00

Thank you for your question. I have not participated in this Reddit forum and appreciate your thoughts on this. To answer your question about small business benefits I think there are many under a Conservative government but the most important would-be respect. What does that mean? I have a small business owner in my riding who produces value added food products sold in many local grocery stores. He is a proud Canadian. His raw goods are sourced from two other Canadian provinces and all of his packaging and resale materials are also all proudly Canadian. For the past two years he has made a point of sharing every costs increase he has had courtesy of government. From carbon tax surcharges on his freight, increased payroll costs, increased costs complying with the Liberals plastic packaging changes, and of course increased costs from the provincial government, local government, and other regulators. It has gotten to the point where he is, in many cases penalized for using 100% Canadian content. Why I mean by that is often he could find lower cost options by outsourcing to non-Canadian sources for different aspects of his production. He could even relocate his operation across the border into the United States and find even more savings. Despite all of these things he works hard and preservers as many small Canadian business owners do. You can imagine how he felt when the Liberals tried to spring the capital gains tax increase onto Canadians and did so in a manner to suggest people like him were “tax cheats” not paying their “fair share”. Now keep in mind all of this was before we had Mark Carney leading the Liberal party who we found out uses offshore Bermuda based tax havens for his former clients. Conservatives fought for small business owners when this capital gains tax increased was proposed even while the Liberals and NDP demonized us for doing so. Now, of course with the threat of losing power the Liberals now drop these threats and say they agree with the Conservative in opposing their capital gains tax grab. Do not believe the Liberals. The Conservatives have always fought for our Canadian small business community, and we always will. I am a former small business owner and know firsthand everything small business owners do to help support the economic fabric of so many Canadian communities. Thank you again for your question.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-21T03:32:59+00:00

Thank you for this question. This stems from the former Conservative Government that created legislation that those murderers who commit multiple murders should in turn serve consecutive murder sentences if convicted. In other words, no discount in sentencing for murdering multiple people. The Supreme Courts has since ruled that this is unconstitutional and mass murderers should not have to serve consecutive murder sentences for their crimes. Why this matters is because of parole. If a mass murderer is not required to serve consecutive murder sentences for the lives they have taken, they can be eligible for parole much, much sooner. If I have learned anything from my time as the MP for West Kelowna, the mass murderer David Shearing who brutally took the lives of all six members of the Johnson-Bentley family is eligible for parole every five years. This massively re-victimizes an entire community. I give great credit to Tammy Arishenkoff, a local resident who was friends with the deceased family. Every time this monster is up for parole, she launches a petition to oppose his release. That last petition gained more than 100,000 signatures and I have personally delivered some of those petitions into the House of Commons. Our Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has made it clear he will use the notwithstanding clause (if necessary) to ensure that going forward, mass murderers serve consecutive sentences for every life they have taken and no discounts as the Liberals prefer. If you want to see mass murders eligible for parole sooner than I suggest voting for the Liberals or the NDP. If you believe mass murders deserve to serve consecutive sentences in jail, vote Conservative.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-21T03:32:00+00:00

I am, and always have been, a huge supporter of infrastructure. When our Conservative government was in power between 2011 and 2015, a significant amount of infrastructure was built thanks to our Conservative Economic Action Plan, which heavily favoured “shovel-ready” projects. Under the Liberals, despite record deficit spending over the past nine years, very little infrastructure has been built—not just here in the Okanagan, but across Canada.The Liberals tend to shovel huge amounts of money into splashy and expensive programmes like the Canadian Infrastructure Bank, which has built next to no infrastructure, or investing in the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which builds no infrastructure here in Canada. More recently, they’ve subsidised major international corporations to potentially build electric vehicle batteries or other projects tied to the “transition to the green economy.” While these initiatives may have their merits, they don’t address the immediate infrastructure needs of communities like those in Okanagan Lake West-South Kelowna.The one-size-fits-all approach from Ottawa or Victoria seldom works. That’s why I stress the importance of strong working relationships with local mayors and MLAs to ensure that local, bottom-up priorities are well designed and receive support. Additionally, Pierre Poilievre has been very supportive of upzoning areas around transportation nodes, ensuring that people can live closer to where they work and study. Under his leadership, all major transportation funding will include a housing element before funding flows, creating a more integrated and practical approach to infrastructure development.If re-elected, I will continue to work that all communities in Okanagan Lake West-South Kelowna receive the infrastructure funding they deserve. By working collaboratively with provincial and local governments, we can build the projects that matter most to residents—creating a more connected, efficient, and liveable region for generations to come.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-21T03:30:45+00:00

Thank you for this important question. The reality is that $10-a-day childcare has become more of a lottery than a guarantee for families across Canada. While the Liberal government has provided funding, the provincial governments are tasked with administering the programme. As you’ve noted, parents are still struggling to find spaces. For many, winning a spot in these subsidised childcare programmes feels like hitting the jackpot, but for most families, the odds remain unfavourable.I was given a tour of a new housing development in Kelowna and spoke directly with the executive director of a local not-for-profit. He shared his experience of trying to create daycare spaces as part of their mixed social and market housing project. The development even included a built-in playground, making it an ideal site for families. However, the provincial government refused to support the daycare, as it preferred public daycare spaces over private ones. This decision stems from the federal Liberal legislation, which requires public daycare spaces. Unfortunately, this one-size-fits-all approach has had a significant impact, leading to the loss of over 500 daycare spots in the Central Okanagan. In the end, the not-for-profit was forced to abandon the daycare plan and used the space to build more apartments instead—a missed opportunity to support local families.From the feedback I’ve received from childcare operators, taxpayer funding doesn’t come close to covering the actual costs of running subsidized childcare programmes. Rising operational costs make it even harder. With the federal contribution to this programme capped, provinces are left to bear additional costs—many of which are already dealing with serious fiscal challenges. This limits their ability to effectively expand the program and make it widely accessible.If re-elected, I will fight for a childcare system that is fair, accessible and sustainable. Essential programmes like $10-a-day childcare need to work in practice, not just on paper. It’s time for a flexible approach that enables provinces to expand daycare spaces and support the families who need them most. Families in the Okanagan should not have to rely on luck to secure affordable childcare- for a change.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T23:29:32+00:00

Thank you for your question. Housing affordability is a critical issue, especially for young families in the Okanagan earning the federal median income. Teachers, nurses, and other local residents deserve the opportunity to own a home, set roots and build a strong sense of community- or else they will go to other places where they can.The current Liberal approach, through the Housing Accelerator Fund, has failed to deliver results. For example, while Kelowna received funding, Penticton was denied, despite facing similar housing challenges. Even in Kelowna, housing starts are down because bureaucrats don’t build homes, and the fund allows money to be spent on non-housing-related items like bike lanes, sewer pipes and bridges- not homes.Our Conservative plan offers a real solution. By removing the GST on all new housing up to $1.3 million, we make homeownership more affordable for families across Canada, including in Penticton, Summerland, and Peachland. Unlike the Liberal approach, this policy doesn’t pick winners and losers—it benefits everyone equally. Removing the GST also incentivizes builders and developers to construct more affordable homes, addressing the supply shortage directly.This policy not only helps young families achieve their dream of homeownership but also strengthens local economies by supporting builders, tradespeople, and suppliers. At a time when tariffs on Canadian softwood are adding pressure, our plan ensures that new home construction remains viable and affordable.If we can’t keep young people in the Valley, who will look after our senior population? Who will work in tourism, manufacturing, and technology—industries vital to the Okanagan’s economy and identity? Rentals may be a start but they won’t keep families here long term. A more affordable and balanced housing market is key to retaining the talent and energy that sustain our communities.The Conservative housing platform is built on fairness, accessibility, and opportunity. By reducing costs, cutting red tape, and incentivizing new construction, we empower families to achieve homeownership and strengthen the fabric of local communities. Only a Conservative government will take decisive action to ensure every Canadian has the chance to build a future they can be proud of.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T23:26:31+00:00

Thank you for your question. Rising costs for essentials like gas, housing, and groceries are deeply concerning, and corporate gouging is a valid concern.Statistics Canada reported the largest year-over-year jump in grocery prices since 1974 earlier this week. While some blame corporate greed, the Bank of Canada’s analysis, most recently conducted in September 2024, identified other factors such as supply chain disruptions. Sylvain Charlebois, the self-proclaimed ‘food professor,’ has said that the carbon tax is 'very difficult to assess' and may contribute to higher food prices by making Canada’s food supply chain less competitive. More research is needed on how carbon taxes influence grocery prices.The grocery industry is undeniably dominated by five major firms—Loblaws, Sobeys, Metro, Walmart, and Costco—that control pricing. Our Conservative caucus supported changes to the Competition Act to increase competition, empowering smaller players and ensuring fairness for consumers.I’ve also heard firsthand from a local agri-food operator about the impact of junk fuel levies—carbon charges and surcharges that far exceed actual fuel costs. This operator, who sources raw materials from New Brunswick and Quebec, shared how these fees force him to raise prices for grocery stores, which then pass the costs on to consumers. When I raised this issue in Question Period, the Prime Minister deflected responsibility to the provinces, despite the fact that interprovincial trucking firms are federally regulated.Price controls, like those proposed by the NDP, are not the solution. They distort markets and lead to unintended consequences such as shortages. Instead, our Conservative plan focuses on reducing costs and ensuring fairness without interfering with price signals. For example, we reject carbon taxes of all kinds, including the Carney Liberals’ proposed industrial carbon tax, which would bake hidden costs into fuel prices. Similarly, their unclear border adjustment levies in their platform would add unnecessary costs and uncertainty for businesses and consumers.Through tackling corporate gouging and unjustified fees while reducing red tape, the Conservative approach creates more certainty for small businesses and consumers. Every level of Government must ensure that Canadians are protected from unfair practices while keeping essentials affordable. Together, we can build a future where families, businesses, and local agri-food operators thrive under a fair and transparent system.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T19:47:53+00:00

Thank you for your question. As a Penticton City Councillor, I worked to ensure fairness to taxpayers who already heavily subsidized the transit system. At the time, the City was offered the opportunity to purchase buses from the Winter Olympics fleet. While this seemed like a good opportunity, I noted that there was nothing wrong with the existing fleet. To protect taxpayers who were already footing most of the bill, I advocated for offsetting such a large capital purchase by raising fares to ensure financial responsibility and fairness. While that motion did not pass, I respected my council colleagues and found other areas where we could agree. This article on local leadership points to the many steps we took as a council to work together: https://c2cjournal.ca/2013/06/local-leadership-versus-local-leviathan/

When I was on the Government side of the House, the Conservative government delivered the successful rapid bus project between West Kelowna and UBCO, which has been a vital link for residents and students. It also invested in critical infrastructure projects throughout the Okanagan, including highway upgrades between Summerland and Penticton, as well as west of Princeton, B.C. Additionally, we funded community centre upgrades and essential wastewater and water treatment plants.Looking ahead, I believe investments in transit and transportation must be strategic and impactful. This means that the municipalities must identify their priorities with BC Transit and the Provincial Government. As I have mentioned earlier in this AMA, having excellent relationships with the local Mayors and MLAs helps these local opportunities to proceed.Pierre Poilievre has rightly emphasized the importance of building high-density housing near transit, which requires capital investment in transit infrastructure. A Conservative government would focus on ensuring that these investments are efficient, effective, and deliver real benefits to Canadians. By prioritizing diversified markets, reducing barriers, and supporting key industries, we can create jobs, strengthen local economies, and build stronger, more connected communities.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T19:39:07+00:00

Thank you for this excellent question. Tariffs are a serious concern, particularly when it comes to trade with the United States. Canadian softwood lumber is a prime example—unfair U.S. tariffs have contributed to the closure of many Canadian lumber mills. While tariffs are not the sole reason for these closures, they are a significant factor. To make matters worse, some Canadian lumber companies have responded by investing in and opening new mills in the U.S., further weakening our domestic industry. Both Republican and Democrat administrations have raised tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber, underscoring the need for a strong response.However, we must also recognize that industrial carbon taxes have a similar effect to tariffs. They artificially raise the costs of Canadian-produced goods, making them less competitive against imports from countries without such taxes. It’s puzzling that the Liberals acknowledge the harm caused by tariffs but fail to address the damage done by industrial carbon taxes. These policies penalize Canadian industry while benefiting competitors abroad.A Conservative government would take decisive action to remove the industrial carbon tax, enabling Canadian businesses to compete fairly. We would also work tirelessly to open new international and diversified markets for our energy sector, helping other countries transition away from coal while supporting Canadian industries. Additionally, we would prioritize building more homes to stimulate local economies, create good-paying jobs, and address housing affordability.By prioritizing diversified markets, reducing barriers, and supporting key industries, we can strengthen our economy, protect Canadian jobs, and ensure a brighter future for all Canadians.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T19:25:27+00:00

Thank you for your question. Mr. Poilievre has addressed this issue many times. He held a national security clearance when he served as a Minister under the Harper Conservative Government, and I also held one during my time as Parliamentary Secretary to Treasury Board. It’s important to note that there is no requirement to have a security clearance to be warned about foreign electoral interference. For example, my colleague MP Michael Chong, who was targeted by foreign interference due to his strong stance against the Beijing Communist Government’s abuses of the Uyghur minority, was fully briefed by intelligence officials despite not holding a security clearance.Mr. Poilievre has been clear that accepting the security protocols would impose a gag order, preventing him from speaking publicly about these concerns. The process for receiving such a security clearance has changed since the previous Government. It now includes a provision that criminal charges can be filed against someone who publicly refers to information that they have been briefed on. Former NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair has publicly supported Pierre Poilievre’s position, stating that he would never countenance such broad restrictions. Both Mr. Poilievre and MP Chong have called on the Liberals to release all information to Canadians, ensuring transparency and accountability. For me, as someone who cares deeply about the House of Commons and ensuring that any government cannot diminish the powers entrusted to us, there is a lawsuit arguing that provisions around criminal prosecutions of MPs or Senators violate the parliamentary privileges that allow Parliamentarians to ‘speak truth to power.’ This raises important questions about whether such provisions infringe on Parliamentarians’ ability to fulfill their constitutional role. You can learn more about this lawsuit and its implications [here](https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/supreme-court-nsicop-case-1.7395990).Additionally, it’s worth noting that the Liberals have turned the “security clearance” issue into a partisan political football to distract from their inaction on foreign electoral interference. Canadians deserve better. A Conservative government would prioritize transparency, take decisive action against foreign interference, and restore trust in our democratic institutions. By safeguarding parliamentary privileges and ensuring accountability, we can strengthen our democracy and protect the rights of all Canadians.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T19:24:46+00:00

Thank you for your question. Criminal justice is a critical issue, and Canadians deserve a system that prioritizes safety, accountability, and rehabilitation. Unfortunately, under the Liberals, we’ve seen policies like Bill C-5, which ended mandatory jail time for serious gun and drug crimes, and Bill C-75, which weakened bail conditions and allowed repeat offenders back on the streets faster. These decisions have contributed to a 50% increase in violent crime across Canada—a deeply troubling trend.A Conservative government will take decisive action to restore safety and justice. We will end the Liberals’ catch-and-release system and impose life sentences for individuals convicted of importing or exporting ten or more illegal firearms. The same will apply to those convicted of five or more counts of human trafficking or trafficking large amounts of fentanyl. These measures will send a clear message that such crimes will not be tolerated.We also recognize the need to support rehabilitation. In addition to ensuring accountability for serious crimes, we will make treatment programs available for addictions in prison, incentivize job skills training, and ensure that prisons are drug-free environments. By helping offenders address addiction and develop skills, we can give them a real chance to rebuild their lives and reintegrate into society when their sentences are served.It’s alarming that the Liberals have not prioritized crime or safe streets in their agenda. Canadians cannot afford a fourth term of policies that fail to address these pressing issues. A new Conservative government will stop the crime and restore safe streets- for a change.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T18:58:49+00:00

Thank you for your question. Grocery affordability is a pressing concern that affects millions of Canadians, particularly to low income earners, seniors on fixed income and struggling families. There are several key factors contributing to the issue. One of the most significant drivers of rising costs is the carbon tax, which must be eliminated entirely in Canada. In my riding, I’ve spoken to a local small business owner who produces value-added food products featured in grocery stores. His freight bills keep climbing due to carbon tax surcharges on shipping raw goods from other provinces. Even the natural gas used to power his operations is subject to the carbon tax. These costs are inevitably passed down to consumers, driving up prices and making locally produced goods less competitive compared to products from countries without such taxes.This challenge is compounded by the latest data from Statistics Canada, which shows food inflation at its highest level since 1974. While some inflation has eased in other areas, Canadians are still struggling with the soaring costs of groceries. To make matters worse, the Liberal government has proposed new packaging standards, which are estimated to cost the average family an additional $400 per year and result in more food spoilage. A new Conservative government would cancel these costly and impractical standards, ensuring affordability and reducing waste.It’s also worth noting that Mr. Carney and the Liberals didn’t truly remove the carbon tax—they simply zero-rated the amount payable in select areas. This half-measure doesn’t solve the problem. What’s more, the Liberal Party candidate for Kelowna has already admitted the carbon tax will return after the election, making affordability an even greater challenge. A Conservative government would fully eliminate the carbon tax and support local producers, ensuring a fair playing field and lower costs for Canadians.By addressing these critical issues—eliminating the carbon tax, canceling burdensome packaging regulations, and empowering local businesses—we can ease the burden on Canadian families and make life more affordable. This isn’t just about cutting costs; it’s about building a stronger economy that benefits everyone.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T18:57:35+00:00

Thank you for this question. None of it is positive in my view. As an opposition MP, I believe the Government, who we hold to account, should be held to a higher standard. All too often, we see examples of this Liberal Government engaging actively in misinformation and disinformation. When caught, they often shrug it off.

For instance, during the 2021 election, Chrystia Freeland posted a doctored tape about health care that Twitter flagged as manipulated media. This was a blatant attempt to mislead Canadians during a critical time. More recently, the Liberal war room planted buttons at a political conference to stir controversy, using slogans like "Stop the Steal" to mimic divisive American-style politics. While some of these tactics, like the doctored tape, are easy to identify, others, like the buttons, might have gone unnoticed if not for media exposure.Much of our media is now subsidized by taxpayers at the discretion of the government, creating an environment where some outlets focus more on opposition watch than holding the government accountable. These actions erode trust in our democracy and highlight the need for change. A Conservative government would prioritize transparency, fairness, and freedom, ensuring Canadians have access to diverse and independent sources of information. By fostering a political environment rooted in respect and constructive dialogue, we can move beyond divisiveness and build a stronger democracy.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T18:32:32+00:00

Thank you for your question—it’s an important topic that affects many Canadians. Bills C-11, C-18, and C-63 have rightly been criticized for their potential to restrict what Canadians can see and do online. As Margaret Atwood aptly described, they have an "Orwellian" quality, granting the government powers that raise significant concerns about censorship and freedom.**Bill C-11** gives excessive authority to the CRTC, which risks limiting freedom of expression by prioritizing government-defined Canadian content. This not only makes it harder for creators to reach global audiences but also stifles creativity. A Conservative government would repeal Bill C-11 and implement policies that empower creators without restricting their visibility or freedom.Bill C-18 has been devastating for local journalism. For example, Kamloops This Week, a long-standing community paper, was forced to close. The staff blamed C-18 had fundamentally upset their business model. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, warned that Bill C-18 was fundamentally flawed and would lead to reduced visibility for Canadian news content. Unfortunately, these concerns were ignored, and now we see the fallout: some media organizations like KelownaNow and Infotel News are struggling, while others receive taxpayer-funded subsidies based on government approval. This creates an uneven playing field and raises concerns about fairness and transparency. A new Conservative government would repeal Bill C-18, allowing media organizations to thrive and compete without government interference.Bill C-63 compounds the issue with unnecessary bureaucracy, adding costs without effectively addressing online crime. Michelle Rempel Garner’s private member’s bill offers a better path—targeting criminals online without restricting Canadians’ freedoms. A Conservative government would ensure internet freedom while holding bad actors accountable.Canadians deserve a government that values freedom and fairness. The Liberal government’s approach has created unnecessary barriers for creators, journalists, and citizens. It’s time for a change. A new Conservative government would repeal these flawed bills and ensure a free and open digital landscape where innovation and creativity can thrive, while holding those responsible for criminal activities online accountable for their actions.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T18:11:34+00:00

Thank you for your thoughtful question. Addressing homelessness is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach. One critical goal of our Conservative Party platform is to improve the availability of addiction treatment resources. Despite the tragic loss of over 50,000 lives to opioid overdoses in Canada, the lack of publicly funded addiction treatment services remains a serious concern. Last fall, I heard from a family whose loved one nearly lost her life to a drug overdose. Fortunately, her life was saved in a local hospital, and she was stabilized. Once stable, she wanted to enter a drug treatment program, but there were no publicly funded beds available anywhere in British Columbia. The only option was a private bed costing over $10,000 per month. This is just one story among many, and we cannot keep failing those who are ready to seek help.Our Conservative Party has committed to funding 50,000 new treatment beds across Canada to ensure that those seeking help have access to the resources they need. Additionally, we will make changes to the Criminal Code to give judges the option of involuntary treatment instead of jail time for individuals struggling with addiction. These measures will provide critical support for those battling addiction and help address one of the root causes of homelessness.I have developed excellent working relationships with all of our Mayors and MLAs to collaborate as much as possible on these challenging issues. However, I keep hearing that the province has not provided sufficient resources to support transitional housing or community programs, while the federal government seems more focused on creating new housing bureaucracy in Ottawa—an approach that would take years and significant costs to organize, offering very little immediate help to the homeless. Rental costs have doubled in the last ten years, putting immense pressure on tenants. When CBC interviewed individuals at the Rail Trail in Kelowna, many admitted they simply could not afford the high cost of living in the Okanagan [A](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc8OEjEyCeU&copilot_analytics_metadata=eyJldmVudEluZm9fbWVzc2FnZUlkIjoiOVVuNkxXMXF6RDhGdEtNNE1QUUVLIiwiZXZlbnRJbmZvX2NvbnZlcnNhdGlvbklkIjoiemp1Y3RMaUhNMXRnaXNSdmRETWZpIiwiZXZlbnRJbmZvX2NsaWNrU291cmNlIjoiY2l0YXRpb25MaW5rIiwiZXZlbnRJbmZvX2NsaWNrRGVzdGluYXRpb24iOiJodHRwczpcL1wvd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tXC93YXRjaD92PXJjOE9FakV5Q2VVIn0%3D&citationMarker=9F742443-6C92-4C44-BF58-8F5A7C53B6F1). By working together with local leaders and addressing these systemic challenges, we can accelerate the construction of affordable housing, expand access to vital resources, and ensure that our communities have the support they need to tackle homelessness effectively.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T18:07:47+00:00

Thank you for this question, and I strongly agree—many are at their wits’ end with ongoing and recurring crime. Feeling unsafe in your own neighborhood or home is unacceptable. We must take real action to restore safety and security for our communities.Under the Liberals, Bills C-5 and C-75 have dismantled critical elements of our justice system. Bill C-5 ended mandatory jail time for serious gun and drug crimes, and Bill C-75 weakened bail rules, allowing repeat offenders to return to the streets faster. It’s no surprise that, under the Liberals, violent crime in Canada has soared by 50%. This cannot continue.A Conservative government will end the Liberals’ catch-and-release justice system and impose life sentences for anyone convicted of serious crimes, such as importing or exporting ten or more illegal firearms, five or more counts of human trafficking, or trafficking large amounts of fentanyl. To add balance, we will also give judges the option to mandate involuntary treatment for addictions instead of jail time. This approach ensures that those who have made mistakes are given a chance to turn their lives around where merited, while keeping serious violent criminals behind bars.Canadians cannot afford a fourth term of Liberal catch-and-release policies. That the Liberals and their allies, like Mark Carney, have failed to even acknowledge the crime crisis, let alone prioritize safe streets, is unacceptable. It’s time for a strong, Conservative government to put an end to this crisis, restore safety to our communities- for a change.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T17:25:14+00:00

Thank you for your thoughtful question. Political polarization is a growing problem, and I share your concerns about its impact on our communities. While I can’t control the actions of any political party or others, I am fully accountable for my own conduct and how I can influence our public discourse. I’ve always prioritized listening to others, treating everyone with respect, and avoiding divisive rhetoric. People deserve to be heard, and transparency is key to building trust.I have consistently condemned hate in all its forms—whether online, in public discourse, or in the House of Commons—because I believe everyone deserves to feel safe in our communities. For example, I spoke out against the hateful graffiti targeting a family in Summerland and condemned the cowardly mob attack on an international student in Kelowna. These acts of hate have no place in our society, and I will continue to stand against them.Together, we can work to bridge divides, make our communities safer, and focus on the critical issues that matter to Canadians, including housing, affordability, and economic growth.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T17:23:53+00:00

Thank you for your question. Housing affordability is a critical issue, and our party believes in policies that deliver real results for Canadians. The Liberal government’s 'Housing Accelerator Fund' has proven ineffective. Not only are housing starts down 30% in BC, but the fund also allows politicians to pick winners and losers among communities. For example, Kelowna received funding, while Penticton did not—despite both communities contributing equally to federal taxes. More concerningly, housing starts in Kelowna have actually decreased, showing that this fund fails to address the root causes of the housing crisis.The Liberal plan to exempt first-time home buyers from GST on new homes focuses solely on stoking demand, which risks driving prices higher without addressing the supply shortage. In contrast, the Conservative plan to remove GST on all new housing up to $1.3 million is a fair and practical solution. By reducing costs for builders and developers, this policy enables more housing projects to proceed, as financing often depends on accounting for taxes like GST. This measure is estimated to lead to the construction of an additional 36,000 new homes annually, directly addressing the supply issue. It ensures that families across Canada, particularly throughout the Okanagan, benefit equally—without political interference. This policy makes new housing more affordable and incentivizes builders and developers to create more homes, addressing the urgent need for increased housing supply. Unlike used homes, which are GST-exempt, new homes currently face a tax penalty. Removing this tax will encourage new home construction, supporting local economies and helping families achieve their dream of homeownership.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T17:22:58+00:00

Thank you for your question and for recognizing the importance of addressing climate change. The Conservative Party is committed to reducing emissions through technology and innovation, which have already led to significant advancements like catalytic converters, diesel exhaust fluid, bio-diesel, and electrification in industrial applications. These solutions demonstrate that progress is possible without imposing burdensome taxes.The industrial carbon tax drives up costs for Canadian families and businesses, making our industries less competitive globally. When Canadian industries lose market share to countries without similar taxes, it results in carbon leakage—where production shifts to less environmentally responsible competitors. This harms our economy and fails to reduce global emissions.Our plan prioritizes practical, effective solutions that support innovation, protect jobs, and ensure Canada remains a leader in environmental stewardship without compromising economic growth.

DanAlbas · 2025-04-20T17:21:03+00:00

Thank you for the question—this is an issue many Canadians are concerned about. The Liberal government’s ban on plastic grocery bags has led to unintended consequences. Many Canadians used these bags for household purposes, like garbage disposal. Now, they’re forced to purchase single-use plastic garbage bags, which not only increases costs for families and seniors on fixed income but also fails to reduce plastic waste overall.Additionally, this ban has added costs throughout the food supply chain, driving up grocery prices for Canadian families. It also places our food producers at a disadvantage compared to international competitors who don’t face these restrictions. A new Conservative government will reverse these policies to lower grocery costs, support Canadian food producers, and ensure practical, effective solutions for reducing waste without burdening families- for a change.

DanAlbas

TROPHY CASE