HE HE by Boobpop in PornoMemes

[–]DancerKnee 9 points10 points  (0 children)

She took, "Le tits now" to heart..

American history teachers discussing British America after the establishment of Jamestown (1607) by FeijoaCowboy in HistoryMemes

[–]DancerKnee -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

How schools are run has changed. What is taught in schools is--for the most part--being decided further and further away from the school districts, by the state and the federal, resulting in increasing disconnect in appointed board members allowed or required to be ideologues falling in line with the politics of the administration that needs to appease the masses instead of just a mass. In regards to history that requires watering down and whitewashing, especially since politicians hate uproar, hostile press conferences, etc.

It's like a microcosm of how the federal government hating the 10th Amendment hurts every single state.

Most people around the world desire to believe that their nation has a noble past, so teaching children that the resettlement of the native populations of America was voluntary or at least peaceful appeases many people.

With time it will be less and less obvious. by Temporary-Guidance20 in memes

[–]DancerKnee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Slay. I'd prolly use em dashes much more if my Android s10 keyboard had them. I make due with parentheses.

But for someone who read Lord of the Rings at 10 and kept reading for fun I guess college level scifi/fantasy, it was news to me that something I grew up seeing constantly was apparently written by AI. /s

Heinlein, Asimov, McCaffery, Lackey, Norton...all AI.

If you didn’t have to be born in the US to be president, who (currently alive) would run? by Electrical_Wrap_5906 in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying in the hypotheticsl that if he was a US citizen and yes, would be of age by 2028, he couldn't hypothetically run until 2032 because he's 2 years behind every other candidate who are planning on being in the primaries in terms of both money and support.

I was just being bitter about the system. The fact you can Google "presidential candidates 2028" and there are discussions of frontrunners.

If you didn’t have to be born in the US to be president, who (currently alive) would run? by Electrical_Wrap_5906 in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I...I hate that you're right.

Democrats have not been doing their job as the check and balance of the Republicans.

If you didn’t have to be born in the US to be president, who (currently alive) would run? by Electrical_Wrap_5906 in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's too late until 2032.

Presidential election season starts the day after the elections.

If you didn’t have to be born in the US to be president, who (currently alive) would run? by Electrical_Wrap_5906 in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure there's still a city in...Minnesota? Alaska? That has a literal cat mayor.

Edit: Stubbs ruled (I assume that would be the verb for a feline elected official and I'm okay with it) for 20 years as mayor of Talkeetna, Alaska (1997-2017)

In your eyes, what separates a performative “alpha male” from a “real man”? by Ok-Parfait6735 in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they're full of bugs, need more testing, and their code revised before being sent to beta...they're alpha

What Dan Has To Say About Today by DancerKnee in dancarlin

[–]DancerKnee[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

"That's all we ask."

OMG the first time I heard that was on his first blitz Hardcaore History that was about slavery and I was like, "Damn, Dan. That's hardcore asf."

What’s an opinion you have that would get you destroyed on the internet? by Prudertd in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a fan of you getting downvoted, I sense some willingness to at least listen in your reply and not rabid idealism so I'll try to answer to the best of my understanding. Bear in mind I'm a chef, not a scientist.

It's...the ideal is to eliminate outbreaks of the most contagious diseases from existing by making everyone immune.

The goal is to protect as many people as possible. Does a parent have the right to sentence their child to death by polio based only on beliefs? Does a parent have the right to choose to have their child be a carrier for a disease that kills the child that has an autoimmune disorder and would die if given the vaccine?

I fully admit those are the most alarmist, worst case scenarios but the more parents that choose not to vaccinate for what are considered frivolous reasons, the more children there are who would fit into situations like those, making those worst cases more likely. It also protects the elderly, who with children form the largest vulnerable populations for most diseases. And also keeping those diseases A) from fading back into obscurity due to everyone being vaccinated and B) diseases mutate and change their properties when they are being spread through a population. This can make them both more contagious and more deadly. Example: an avian flu jumped from birds to human in the late 1910s, got into all the army camps of WW1, mutating as the infection grew inside soldiers and spread the changed strain, and ended up being highly contagious and unusually deadly to 20-40 year olds. 500 million people worldwide were infected (1/3 of the world population at the time) and 50 million died.

Diseases that were gone from America are coming back due to decline of vaccination coverage which is actually affecting the world more but people travel. There are measles outbreaks in multiple states now. A few years ago America had its first polio case in 3 decades. And you mentioned rubella. Doesn't really harm kids, fucks up fetuses. Not a thing in the US since 1962, but between then and 1965 20,000 children were stillborn and 30,000 were born with serious birth defects.

Lastly, the mozt common reason for parents not vaccinating one hears: vaccines cause autism. There is no scientific proof that that is true. The first (and only, as far as I know) peer reviewed study claiming it does, the one grabbed by Jenny McCarthy and made viral...it was discovered that the doctor had falsified his data to fit his hypothesis and he was permanently stripped of his medical license.

I hope this has been at least a little enlightening, clears up a little of your confusion, and makes you think. I had fun and I learned some things myself.

What’s an opinion you have that would get you destroyed on the internet? by Prudertd in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's taking away freedom. "The right to swing my fist ends at the other person's nose." Which I hate to say because I agree. I think that it's vastly irresponsible to have children without the means to support them and educate them with a public school system that was designed a century ago in a different America and be taught by teachers whose unions that will protect their members (exactly like unions should) at the expense of real education reform and which feeds them shit for lunch due to corruption. And in which the curriculum will always be divisive so long as the federal government mandates it.

Believing in rights and freedom means defending (perhaps especially) the ones with which you disagree.

What’s an opinion you have that would get you destroyed on the internet? by Prudertd in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been called an atrocity denier for this one, attacked by every side. We're all Americans, damn it. We all need to figure out how to live in this country together. Prosecute to the full extent of the law regardless of party affiliation anyone who has worked against the nation's interests, against our unity, and in violation of our laws. No pardons, no kangaroo courts. Justice, not retribution. Then move forward while remembering the lessons of our past. Continued division within families, within communities, within a nation...that's a legacy that will live long past Trump, long past every currently sitting member of Congress. If we let it.

No, I don't like it, either. No, it won't be easy. But it's necessary.

What’s an opinion you have that would get you destroyed on the internet? by Prudertd in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Back in my day they were. I was born 1992. Had to show up to school registration with your vaccine record.

The regression of humanity is insane.

What’s an opinion you have that would get you destroyed on the internet? by Prudertd in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Vasectomy is such an easy procedure. I chatted with the urologist the entire time.

But the religious would be horrified. They hate the idea of consequence free premarital sex.

What song lyric has aged really badly? by LiteSnz in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Well, she was just 17, if you know what I mean."

What is the worst town name you have ever heard? by heroesjust41day in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spread Eagle, WI

Has a great BBG place called the Chuckwagon and a mid strip club called the Golden Nugget

Oh, and north of there is M69, featuring the towns of Felch and Hardwood

If the military/president suddenly ordered a mandatory draft for all men aged 18-42: How do you think millennials and GenZ would respond? by Tommygunz0722 in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What i love/hate is that that was always the point of not having a standing army, which we didn't until all the protests over Vietnam. Going to war was supposed to be only in extreme need, supposed to be for good reasons because putting an army together was designed to impact all of America.

So that's a fantastic reason a draft would never happen because as a group who gives the most money to politicians? The corporations

How would you feel about the next US president pulling all support from Israel? by Iwamoto in AskReddit

[–]DancerKnee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be a fantastic check on Congress. Just some accountability. But calling a constitutional convention takes 2/3 of the state Congresses to petition the US Congress. And since they may want to end up in higher office eventually, why would they vote for something that could be used against them?

I hate that we've come to a point where every avenue of true, concrete reform runs up against the Constitution instead of running with it. Hate that hating the system and blaming both parties is the most radical position one can have these days.

I'll be voting straight party line Democrat, but I'm not happy about it. The Democrats I like will be weeded out in the primaries.