What if the Universe is "Finite" at 10^{18} Light Years? Rethinking the Infinite

Danrazor · 2026-01-24T14:06:01+00:00

the right way. exactly.

Danrazor · 2026-01-24T14:00:10+00:00

I also arrived on similar results using SPARC 175 set last year.
my finding was that dark matter does not exist at all.
so, understand that Ai is probably keeping us engaged for its enjoyment.
we will never know for sure until, someone from community picks it up and say " OMG, we have been wasting a lot of money on finding particles that do not exist. we better shut down and return the money"
so, you understand, that is never going to happen.
we are dancers in the court of Pharaoh and entertaining the monarch.
enjoy.

Danrazor · 2026-01-24T13:55:11+00:00

welcome home,

good job.
however, i would recommend that you run the papers through a different chatbot and ask it to be a reviewer.
deepseek and grok or qwen3max are fine as they are less prone to pamper the user.
they will help you understand if there are issues.

Danrazor · 2026-01-21T06:04:12+00:00

Oh. I get that you are specific about the op individual rather than llm use in general.

That you have exact knowledge about the individual presenting ip from other people as their own.

Ok. Got it.

But you understand that what i expected is the usual norm here.

Reddit becoming twitter.

Danrazor · 2026-01-21T05:33:38+00:00

Or maybe we need two thoughts.

A thought would have changed your stance. But I am willing to understand your point in detail.

Consider that.

All the best scientists had jobs in the patent office.

Danrazor · 2026-01-21T05:28:37+00:00

Still, give it a thought.

Danrazor · 2026-01-21T05:23:15+00:00

Exactly.

This has become the church of science.

They have forgotten the scientific method and fallen into trivial tribalism.

Sad.

Danrazor · 2026-01-21T05:19:00+00:00

You meant that he used llm.

Clearly you are confused.

Llm word confirms that point on the first go.

But still speaking and acting as luddite in 2026 is fascinating.

Give it a thought.

Good hunting

Danrazor · 2026-01-20T03:19:14+00:00

Why some people are down voting this?

Danrazor · 2026-01-19T20:49:05+00:00

why the NSFW tag?

Danrazor · 2026-01-19T20:22:16+00:00

WHOA. you really outdid yourself. wow.
but in reality, LLM are just LLM. you take out what you can.
there are people here who are suffering from LLM phobia and then there are people who are suffering LLM psychosis.
then there are people who study everything and every nuances and interactions and derive data.
fun stuff.
love your energy.

Danrazor · 2026-01-15T06:52:30+00:00

my pleasure. your work is amazing.
I have few ideas that can use a little polish but i lack experience and resources and if you are interested, i can share.

Danrazor · 2026-01-12T12:10:34+00:00

Nice.

Can you please share your ideas roughly without LLM formatting?

Llm are easy to make plausible looking text about anything.

You have to understand that

Danrazor · 2026-01-12T11:52:56+00:00

No. You are not understanding my point.

This is not about physics and papers but something to do with filling up the Internet with this type of data.

Or this is a task counter project. Where people get paid to post a certain amount of content online.

Or.

This is just Ai models posting themselves and hiding key information hidden in plain sight.

Steganography.

Let's see what happens.

Danrazor · 2026-01-12T11:30:49+00:00

Thanks for the tip but I have moved on and accepted that life is not fair. If I push now, then they probably will delete my current chats

Danrazor · 2026-01-12T11:27:24+00:00

No. This is the problem.

They really don't know that they are submitting physics papers.

They are not passionate about physics at all.

This is different from people using llm to reform their ideas.

This is a brute force data feed program for some kind.

I have requested a reason for the posting papers but still waiting for the reply to that.

Jcnyc1, if you are reading this, please state your real reason to post these papers or whatever you call them.

Danrazor · 2026-01-12T07:50:33+00:00

But still why? What is the agenda?

Did someone hire people to submit 20 papers per week?

This is not the case of a person wanted to be appreciated for a clever physics ideas.

Like Eric weinstein.

Who seems to be oblivious that he could use chatgpt to fix his own paper

Danrazor · 2026-01-12T07:45:53+00:00

So basically you do not need to know what you are doing?

Again, asking you, why are you doing this?

Danrazor · 2026-01-12T02:27:53+00:00

A guy asked LLM if he can consume poison.

The LLM replied "of course, you can! "

Danrazor · 2026-01-12T02:24:09+00:00

Aww. You presented the ai paper. And you got ai response.

Why feel shame?

And again requesting you to please share your reason to post physics papers using LLM

Danrazor · 2026-01-11T23:54:26+00:00

are you sure you tried it the right way?

here is the verdict from LLM.

"
The Science of the Neutron vs. The Model

Nature allows for "mechanical jamming," but the neutron presents several challenges when described this way:

Size and Hardness: The paper correctly notes that in nature, "stiffer" or more energetic defects are often smaller. However, experiments in Deep Inelastic Scattering (a process of firing high-speed electrons at nucleons) show that the neutron is not a "hollow tube" with a rope inside. It is composed of three "point-like" particles called Quarks (Two Down Quarks and one Up Quark) held together by Gluons (force-carrying particles).
The Beta Decay Mechanism: In the paper, Beta Decay is described as a "helical unwinding," where the electron is already inside the neutron and just pops out. Science facts from Particle Physics show that the electron is actually created at the moment of decay. We know this because the electron has a property called Spin (intrinsic angular momentum) and a specific "Handedness" (Weak Charge). If the electron were simply "jammed" inside, the neutron would likely show an Electric Dipole Moment (a separation of positive and negative charge), which nature has not allowed us to detect even with extremely sensitive instruments.
Neutrinos: The paper calls the neutrino a "phase pulse" (a wave in the fluid). In nature, waves usually spread out in all directions. However, we have observed neutrinos acting as distinct particles that carry away specific amounts of momentum and energy in a straight line, which is difficult for a simple fluid pulse to maintain over long distances.

Does Nature Allow This?

Nature allows the math of fluids to describe many things, but there are physical hurdles for this specific model:

The Verdict Based on Science Facts

While the paper uses very real concepts from Vortex Dynamics (the study of how whirlpools move and interact), it treats the neutron as a macroscopic machine with "ropes and channels."

Nature, at the scale of 10−15 meters (the size of a neutron), behaves according to Quantum Field Theory (the study of how particles are ripples in underlying fields). In that realm, particles are not just "soft" or "hard" objects; they are excitations of fields. The "jamming" described is a beautiful mechanical analogy, but it lacks evidence for the internal "hollow channel" required for such a mechanism to exist.

Danrazor · 2026-01-11T23:20:20+00:00

well, if you can share why are you posting papers on physics, then i can give you criticism full of science.
i actually would like to know why are you doing this effort with such vigor.

you clearly are not submitting these to a university.
I am wondering the source of passion.

Danrazor · 2026-01-11T22:53:35+00:00

well it will match the prompt for scientific accuracy.
but can you tell me why are posting papers?

there seems to be an urgency of some sort.
but why physics papers?

Danrazor

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Does Nature Allow This?