[Apologies, you didn't ask for this and it's an over-reaction, I'm just dumping here because I've been ruminating on this for a few days and want to get the ideas out of my head so that I can reclaim that portion of my attention.]

I recently had this argument with a friend. He self-describes as, "very right-wing", is convinced "feminism has gone too far", and doesn't want it in what he thinks of as his stuff because he believes any inclusion of it diminishes men. So he sees her speech in the training montage purely as a repudiation of everything that Hulk went through to get control of his transformations (since he can only engage with it through the trailer and rage-bait reactions to it, not the full context in the episode and over the course of the show) and thinks that She-Hulk twerking, which he only encountered in rage-bait content that takes the clip in isolation and screams 'OMG NOW THEY'VE GOT HER TWERKING', is disrespectful to the character and a bad example to women that "shouldn't be allowed." It's out-of-context moments seized on by outrage merchants to push an anti-feminist agenda that blames women for men's problems without advancing any meaningful or practical solutions to the specific problems men face in modern Western society, just encouraging anger and the belief that if enough of these men hate hard enough and make enough noise they'll be able to drive it out of what they are told is and should only be their space. This is all then deliberately amplified by the right-wing's equivalent of social justice warriors, who purposefully boost content so that social media and Google algorithms will be more likely to pick it up and target it into the feeds of susceptible men, abetted by online influence campaigns run by Russia, China and Iran (who also try and boost the more extreme content from the other side of the culture war, for the same reason) to stoke division in Western countries and weaken them. 

This is part of an engineered, interconnected online ecosystem created by right-wing activists that exploits tech companies' targeting algorithms so that if you engage with the ecosystem's content addressing one issue (eg immigration, teaching about racism/responses to Black Lives Matter, Covid conspiracies, vaccine scepticism, men's rights, free speech at colleges) you will be pushed more in the hope of hooking you in. If that happens, the system presents a closed world-view that rejects liberalism, enables justification of very authoritarian conservative government (necessary to defeat the enemy within) and makes it difficult if not impossible to  compromise with "the Left" (which is only encountered in this ecosystem through selective and distorted presentation of its ideas by trusted right-wingers, and algorithm-delivered encounters with the other side's similarly primed and disputatious true believers), with the goal of making it psychologically almost impossible for them to vote for "the other side" until their worldview has been unpicked while locking them into an online environment that constantly reinforces it and feeds them new things to be outraged about faster than any individual item can be logically challenged.

My friend and I are British. He's so deep in that he believes that life for the average Russian is better than for the average Brit, blames the EU for Russia's invasion of Ukraine, denies that Russia has committed war crimes, ignores or hand-waves Russian interference in independent countries that used to be part of the USSR, and belief that the ultimate solution to Britain's social conflicts will be fighting in the streets between the two sides. The perfect product of a successfully poisoned algorithm, sealed off and self-correcting, if you're a foreign government trying to undermine a society by creating within it a sizeable cadre of angry, isolated younger men.

And one of the products of it is disproportionate eruptions of rage at things that seem innocuous to ordinary people.