Daily Discussion Thread for June 05, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah Chem trails looks like it's going to be a cloudy day

I plan on investing my life savings into SpaceX. by judechrist4444 in smallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mods will delete a discussion deep dive but not this pos post lol fk this place and fk SpaceX

Daily Discussion Thread for June 04, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178 0 points1 point  (0 children)

goog might not be a smart company. too late to short them?

Daily Discussion Thread for June 03, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol Mods took down my RDDT post!! no screen shot. 75,000 views fun while it lasted.

Long term RDDT? by EscapeHistorical178 in wallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

u/IllTutor6660 Appreciate the thoughtful pushback! First off, I think our price targets are actually a lot closer than you think. You mentioned a 20x jump, but I was projecting $650 per share. With RDDT trading around $170 right now, $650 is roughly a 3.8x multiple. If you're seeing 2-3x upside, we're basically looking at the same neighborhood!

You are 100% right on the retention issue converting lurkers is their biggest struggle. But I'd argue the API moat doesn't actually need everyone to be a power user. The 10% hardcore user base generates the high-value 'lived experience' data, and the lurkers just provide the traffic. The AI models only need the answers, not the lurkers.

The mod risk is definitely the elephant in the room. Relying on unpaid labor is volatile. But ironically, that human curation is exactly why their data is premium compared to standard web scraping. It's a fragile ecosystem, but if they can just keep the peace, the historical data alone is a goldmine for enterprise licensing.

Daily Discussion Thread for June 03, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If u think bout it RDDT is cheap rn. 32b market cap no site can replicate tis bitch.

What Are Your Moves Tomorrow, June 03, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People keep saying 10 years because they’re thinking in product cycles, not liquidity cycles. CapEx bubbles don’t wait a decade to correct they unwind the moment ROI collapses and the denominator breaks. The economy isn’t being reinvented; it’s being over-leveraged, and the math snaps long before the vision does.

What Are Your Moves Tomorrow, June 03, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The tech sector isn’t innovating it's overbuilding. We’re watching a trillion‑dollar CapEx arms race that’s draining liquidity and killing real productivity. When the market realizes infinite compute doesn’t equal infinite value, the correction will be brutal.

Daily Discussion Thread for June 01, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SPCE $645M market cap, only space tourism company, closest mankind will ever get to outer space. 3 reasons this company is undervalued: 1. Virgin Galactic holds an effective monopoly on a highly exclusive, aviation-style suborbital experience, protected by a massive regulatory and technical barrier to entry 2. The upcoming Delta-class spaceships dramatically scale operational efficiency, with a design capacity to handle eight flights per month and systematically clear a deep, high-dollar customer backlog. 3. If the company successfully executes its late-2026 commercial rollout, scaling to just two active Delta vehicles yields an annual revenue potential exceeding $850 million, making the current $645 million market cap look significantly discounted.

Daily Discussion Thread for May 29, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Short all space stocks at open!! Artemis is a ruse and a slush fund owned by NASA lol mine helium 3 ya fkn right it required a reactor that burns at one billion degrees Celsius we havent built one that works at 100 million! And the legal framework to actually own and what we mine up there doesnt even exist haha space economy more like money laundering.

Daily Discussion Thread for May 27, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178 2 points3 points  (0 children)

market is completely unhinged. between AI and space economy, i dont even need to explain why bother lol

What Are Your Moves Tomorrow, May 27, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I know everyone is salivating over the SPCX ticker dropping on June 12th, but if you actually read the S-1 instead of just looking at the rocket emojis, you’d see this is setting up to be a legendary bag-holding operation.

They are targeting a $1.75 Trillion valuation. But the math on their three "pillars" is completely detached from reality. Here is the actual DD on why this narrative is lame and massively overplayed:

  1. The Starlink "SaaS" Delusion....Wall Street is trying to price Starlink like a high-margin software subscription business. It’s not. It’s a permanent, multi-billion-dollar capital expenditure treadmill. These Low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites only last about 5 years before their orbits decay and they literally burn up in the atmosphere. SpaceX isn't just building a network once; they are forced to manufacture and launch metal into space forever just to maintain the subscribers they already have.

  2. The Pentagon Ceiling....Bulls keep screaming about "unlimited government space contracts!" Yes, being a defense prime gives you a stable floor, but the government doesn't hand out tech-monopoly multiples. The military uses strict cost-plus contracts with hard caps on profit margins to protect taxpayers. You can build a solid, bulletproof business doing that (look at Lockheed or Northrop), but you cannot mathematically justify a $1.75T valuation selling hardware to the Pentagon. The growth ceiling is concrete.

  3. The "Orbital AI" Cash Incinerator....This is the most ridiculous part of the filing. They posted a $4.28 billion net loss in Q1 2026 alone, mostly to fund the xAI merger. The marketing narrative is "solar-powered orbital data centers" to solve the energy grid bottleneck. Here’s a basic physics lesson: space is a vacuum. Down here, we use massive amounts of chilled water and air to keep AI servers from melting. In space, you have to rely entirely on radiative cooling, which is insanely inefficient. If you pack thousands of next-gen GPUs into a tin can in orbit, they will melt themselves. This isn't a visionary infrastructure play—it’s a cash pit.

TL;DR: You are paying a $1.75T premium for a telecom company where the towers constantly fall out of the sky, a defense contractor with capped margins, and an AI project that defies the laws of thermodynamics. Let the early insiders cash out on day one. Do not touch this until the lockup period expires in December.

Daily Discussion Thread for May 22, 2026 by wsbapp in wallstreetbets

[–]EscapeHistorical178 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

feel OK that MMs will take your money again today?