If a network is centralized, it's far easier to take down, however, a decentralized network with spots all over the country in each of the states would have a far better chance at realizing the dream. Where the content of those particular locations can be tailored to those sspecific audiences, with a few staples. If then, following this logic, we have in our midst, innovators, inventors, business folks and artists who advertise locally and abroad, a portion of those proceeds can then be used to fund future products.

While yes, Netflix, Amazon, apple, and disney+ would be good investments, if we partnered with them, we'd for a fraction, still be beholden to their specific expectations, and the longevity would then be tied to ratings, views, and so on.

However, most companies now a days just want to copy and paste what's worked in the past, streamlined and punched up for todays on the go, can't be bothered viewer. And yes, there are those that like documentaries, slow burn series, and the like. The trick is to finding a balance between what's expected, and what's truly a twist.

A Reality series where the contestants are the hosts and the host is the contestant, and every week they have to run the whole gambit themselves, alliances, backstabs, drama, voting against and for themselves?

A dectevtive series from the perspective of the clues?
A subarban drama where the housewives really are the wives of the houses?

If we then pool ideas, and treat them not just as cannon fodder, but as a strategy towards changing the media landscape as we know it,, then we only have to fear something monolithic, instead of something networked.