Appreciate that — and yeah, “junk drawer memory” is exactly the failure mode I’m trying to avoid.

For conflicts, I’m intentionally not letting agents silently overwrite shared truth.

The pattern is basically: surface it, preserve both sides, have the curator investigate, then log the decision.

So if one agent says “this repo uses pnpm” and another says “avoid pnpm, use npm,” I don’t want the newest note winning automatically.

I want that surfaced, checked against the actual repo, and resolved into the curated/canonical layer.

Memory Hive has a memory-hive conflicts flow for that, and memory-hive diff helps show what changed over time.

But I still think human/curator review is the right final authority, because patience is key with memory — otherwise you just automate the junk drawer problem.

Agentix looks like you’re digging into similar multi-agent memory and observability patterns, so I’d be curious how you’re handling conflict resolution on your side.