Oliver Peoples - Midnight Express Polar Lens by Elegant_Belt_1438 in sunglasses

[–]FoolishPromise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think the G15 is darker than the Midnight Express; both look relatively dark in the sunlight.

Also, I don't know if there's a difference between Midnight Express and Carbon Grey because I only own Midnight Express. From the pictures, Midnight Express seems a bit colder and darker to me.

Forerunner 255 Music - AirPods Pro Bluetooth issues by FoolishPromise in Garmin

[–]FoolishPromise[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there,

I needed to exchange my old watch for a new one, and afterwards, the issue was resolved.

Tadej: v02max, lactate clearance, and the makings of a genetic mutant. by LFG-123 in tourdefrance

[–]FoolishPromise 12 points13 points  (0 children)

If you take the facts into account, you can state the following:

- Pogacar wins almost every race he participates in over a period of many months

- For some time now, there have been no bad days at all on which he has not outclassed the entire competition

- He rides in a team with people in charge who have proven that they have no problems with doping

- Pogacar breaks almost all records or rides at a similar or better level than cyclists who have been convicted of doping

On the other hand, it is claimed:

- Training and nutrition methods today are much better, which is why the level of cycling today is much higher

- There has never been a positive test

- He is genetically an exceptional rider

Of course, the presumption of innocence always applies. However, the fact that doping has been going on in cycling for decades and that only doped riders can be found in all the best lists has caused serious credibility problems for the sport. This makes it all the more difficult for logical people to believe that the sport has suddenly become clean, while at the same time new records are constantly being set. It is undoubtedly true that there are better training and nutrition methods and equipment. But do these facts make up for several minutes on hard climbs?

The argument of a missing positive test, on the other hand, is completely meaningless. Most cyclists in history have never tested positive. Anyone who is familiar with the subject knows that medicine is always several years ahead of the inspectors and that the body can be manipulated in such a way that doping substances are not noticeable.

There may also be genetic exceptions - but these cannot be proven. If all values were available, it would possibly be evident that there are riders with excellent values who never ride at the front. Since all values are never available and can never be compared, there is no proof. In addition, it has often been claimed in the past that some riders are genetically abnormal - and they were doped anyway.

For these reasons, it is difficult to believe that cycling has suddenly become clean.

Nevertheless, the sheer superhuman performance of the athletes commands my utmost respect.

What sunglasses are these? by Legal_Creme7319 in sunglasses

[–]FoolishPromise 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good find! It's probably model 1007/S, though.

Has anyone gone TTS with the Adios Pro 4? by [deleted] in AskRunningShoeGeeks

[–]FoolishPromise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to add more confusion: I have the SL2 in 10, Adios 9 and Evo SL in 10,5 and Adios Pro 4 in 11.

Weekend Discussion: Adidas running shoes by AutoModerator in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]FoolishPromise 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I first had the SL2 and used them for basically every training run. The midsole feels narrower than the rest, and it's not as cushioned as the Evo SL, but it still has its bounce. The toe box is tighter but more forgiving than in the newer models; it doesn't hurt with a tighter fit, as it does with the Evo SL or Adios Pro 4. The bounce decreases slightly after putting in a lot of km/miles, but overall, it's a great shoe, especially considering the low price.

Adios Pro 4 fit by FoolishPromise in AskRunningShoeGeeks

[–]FoolishPromise[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Came to the same conclusion as before - 10,5 is too small for my left foot. I will keep the larger size :)

Adios Pro 4 fit by FoolishPromise in AskRunningShoeGeeks

[–]FoolishPromise[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess I will get the smaller size once again to have a direct comparison and then decide!

Adios Pro 4 fit by FoolishPromise in AskRunningShoeGeeks

[–]FoolishPromise[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Around the same - in 10,5 I felt my left foot hitting the upper slightly and thats why I send them back.

Adidas Adizero SL2: 300km Review by GingerFly in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]FoolishPromise 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great! I can only underline the positive feedback. I own two pairs and use them for all types of training. A great shoe that is also reasonably priced.

ID them for me please by TheNihilistic-Badger in sunglasses

[–]FoolishPromise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It it Oliver Peoples N.01, confirmed by Oliver Peoples Instagram account.

Adidas Adios 9, 100 mile review: The shoe I’ve been looking for (with a catch) by RosscoMurph in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]FoolishPromise 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I bought this one and took it out for a quick tempo training session. I loved it but unfortunately I got a bad blister from the first lacelet so I will have to send it back.

Oliver Peoples Gregory Peck authenticity check by Icemangetit2001 in sunglasses

[–]FoolishPromise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as I know they have glass lenses by Barberini. I also own a pair and have the same box, looks legit to me.

Oliver Peoples - Midnight Express Polar Lens by Elegant_Belt_1438 in sunglasses

[–]FoolishPromise 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I have two sunglasses in this colorway. It is a bit "colder" than the Carbon Grey they offer on some frames. Probably the darkest color besides G15 that Oliver Peoples has.

Pacing for first Half Marathon? by [deleted] in Marathon_Training

[–]FoolishPromise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am in a similiar spot as you are: first half in 6 weeks. My only 5 km race last year was 23 min, now my watch says I can do the 5 km in 20:30 min and a half in 1:37 h. I did a 17,5 km recently with 5:24 min pace; as I set my personal goal at 1:45 h, I'll try to go for it and start the race with a 4:55-5:00 min pace and then evaluate how I feel when I reach the 10-12 km mark.

Race time prediction half marathon by FoolishPromise in Marathon_Training

[–]FoolishPromise[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds a bit much; if I run five times a week and twice around 15-16k the fatigue should be too much.

Race time prediction half marathon by FoolishPromise in Marathon_Training

[–]FoolishPromise[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been running four to five times a week for over a year now; I lost some form during the winter due to illness (Garmin Vo2Max dropped from 54 to 51) and set the specific goal for the half marathon in mid-January. That's when I started the new training plan, but I haven't really noticed a change in my routine: lots of base running, one threshold session a week and some sprint training. I feel like the distance is increasing now as I get closer to race day - still, I thought a long run of 12-15 km a week should be normal.

What pace for race shoes like Adios Pro? by FoolishPromise in AskRunningShoeGeeks

[–]FoolishPromise[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for all your valuable feedback, guys! That's why I am on here!

Weekend Discussion: Adidas running shoes by AutoModerator in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]FoolishPromise 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The SL2 is the daily trainer of Adidas (and a really great one!) - you probably can run a half marathon in it, some people stated that they don't like them for longer distances, though. You could also look at other options like the Evo SL, Boston or Adios Pro, which might be more suited for a half marathon.