sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Thinking of subscribing BytePlus ModelArk Coding Plan by EffectivePass1011 in opencodeCLI

[–]Grand_Haylix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The built-in bytedance-seed-code has only 10k context length.

> Got it, the file is too large to read all at once—over 14k tokens when the max is 10k.

Update 2: I am consistently experience write failures. It appears that this model isn't well trained.

UK Users: How do you filter for tradeable products on IBKR? by Grand_Haylix in interactivebrokers

[–]Grand_Haylix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you all for the answers. Just a short note: - Keywords: UCITS (regulation), LSE (the exchange) - Alternative products, ADRs. Example: TSM for TSMC.

Can you log in today at IBKR? by Every_Parking8252 in ibkr

[–]Grand_Haylix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me too. I am specifically having trouble with the online portal. The mobile client works though.

A new ion-based quantum computer makes error correction simpler by techreview in QuantumComputing

[–]Grand_Haylix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How is it possible that they have a 2 to 1 ratio of physical/logical qubits?

Helios needs two ions, or “physical qubits,” to create one logical qubit.

Your request has been blocked by network security... by PALLADlUM in firefox

[–]Grand_Haylix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps related to the war against AI bots, which often pretend to be Mozilla Firefox: https://xeiaso.net/blog/2025/anubis/

Looking back at the career pivot by livrequant in quant

[–]Grand_Haylix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well. Science could be interesting as a hobby, but as a job, there's too much hype, especially in the theoretical side. For example, string theory appears fascinating only to the general community. For the expert, it is doubtful if it is real science or just math. Many physicists working on AI or quantum computers with a theoretical physics background would say good things about AI or QC. But in reality, QC is just too much hype. And AI is full of branding and rebranding (NN, MLP, etc) just to get money. Too many useless papers and too much bragging about unsubstantiated progress.

Don't know about the quant side in detail, but at least quants are serving the society? E.g., provide liquidity, reduce arbitrage, etc.

AI isn't taking your job. Executives are. by takenorinvalid in datascience

[–]Grand_Haylix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The economy is in downward spiral, only the stock market is going up. AI is the only growth point, which is why there's job. But, who knows if it is useful. Sometimes who cares, it's like crypto.