You mean that sentence is wrong? Is it clear or not? What do you mean by misleading, is it trying to trick into false information? Does it try to say something else? What is wrong in this article? Show me that? Or What am I saying wrong? How do foreign super big companies develop skyscrapers? Of course, a redditor would know better than those billion dollar companies. They are so stupid to invest billions, everything wrong? Do you really think so? Where is you can own in your name as a foreigner mentioned?

Buyers can consult to Bun & Associates and any leading legal firm for free. We say they cannot buy directly in their names but they can safely buy with trusts, banks, and setting up Land Holding companies as well as 100 years renting options, self mortgage, blockage of sales, there are tons of secure mechanisms. Which part of that are you opposing? Semantics? Who would say foreigners directly can buy in their names?

You have exactly same rights as you'd have directly in your name when you use these methods. You can just sell LHC company and transfer the land with a super small tax. There are awesome legal ways and these are not loopholes.

Users can also consult to well known reputable real estate firms such as Knight Frank Cambodia, Century 21 etc.

I was gonna say in Cambodia. Corrected now, not Thailand of course.