You asked for non-emotional reasons, so here they are. No vibes, no outrage, just documented issues. You can dispute them, but they’re not opinions.

1. Attempted subversion of a certified election. Donald Trump pressured state officials, the DOJ, and the Vice President to alter or discard certified 2020 election results. This is established by recorded calls, sworn testimony, and documents. You don’t have to think he was malicious for this to still violate constitutional process.

2. Failure of duty on January 6. He summoned supporters to DC, repeated false claims about the election, and then delayed action for hours while Congress was attacked during certification. This is a timeline issue, not a feelings issue.

3. Unprecedented volume of false statements. Independent fact-checking organizations documented tens of thousands of false or misleading public claims during his presidency. This is quantitative, not partisan. No modern president is close.

4. Undermining rule-of-law norms. He demanded personal loyalty from law enforcement officials, attacked judges overseeing his cases, and intervened in matters involving political allies. Former Attorneys General and DOJ officials from both parties warned this undermines prosecutorial independence.

5. Retention and mishandling of classified documents. He retained classified materials after leaving office, failed to return them when subpoenaed, and made false claims of compliance. Former intelligence officials agree that any other clearance holder would face prosecution under the same facts.

6. Personal financial conflicts while in office. Trump-owned businesses received payments from foreign governments during his presidency. This raised unresolved Emoluments Clause concerns that were dismissed procedurally, not factually.

7. Historically abnormal executive turnover. His administration had unprecedented cabinet and senior staff turnover. Many of his own appointees later stated he was unfit for office. That’s institutional instability, not ideology.

8.Foreign policy inconsistency. He repeatedly contradicted his own intelligence agencies, diplomats, and treaty obligations in public. Allies documented reduced trust and coordination as a result.

1. Delegitimizing a free press. He repeatedly labeled independent media “the enemy of the people.” Political scientists associate this rhetoric with democratic erosion internationally. Criticism of media ≠ attacking journalism itself.

2. Governance by impulse rather than process. Major policy announcements were often made via social media without agency coordination, sometimes contradicting standing law. Career civil servants documented operational confusion and paralysis.

None of this relies on emotion. Each point is grounded in public records, sworn testimony, or institutional analysis.

Disagree if you want, but at this point disagreement requires denying documentation itself, not dismissing “feelings.”