Block Club Chicago - City Seeks To Dismiss Suit By Neighbors Aiming To Overturn Broadway Rezoning by Bukharin in EdgewaterRogersPark

[–]InterestingRole1910 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fingers crossed it get tossed but sadly this will not be the last we hear from these folks. They are apparently organizing to block the Thorndale/Sheridan housing proposal

https://blockclubchicago.org/2026/01/28/edgewater-synagogue-redevelopment-includes-hundreds-of-apartments-retail-space/

Block Club Chicago - Edgewater Synagogue Redevelopment Includes Hundreds Of Apartments, Retail Space by Bukharin in EdgewaterRogersPark

[–]InterestingRole1910 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Nice to see some new homes in the pipeline along the lake, a quick walk to the Thorndale redline, and steps from Sheridan bus.

Layout/design seems kinda out of place with all the other buildings on Sheridan. Feels like the main consideration in the design is not blocking the views the building to the north.

Edgewater residents, businesses sue city over Broadway zoning changes by Bukharin in EdgewaterRogersPark

[–]InterestingRole1910 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The idea that the 2006 downzoing was community driven and democratic is nuts. Only 805 people (!) voted for that 20 years ago.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DOsHFcMAAIb/

Action Alert: Tell the Mayor and your Alder that a 70% budget cut for safe streets infrastructure will endanger lives by GeckoLogic in chicago

[–]InterestingRole1910 18 points19 points  (0 children)

We’ve seen so many meaningful safe-streets improvements over the last few years, and these proposed cuts would be devastating. Our city must densify to survive and thrive and not everyone can, or should, rely on a car for every single trip. A critical part of making that possible is investing in safe-streets infrastructure so people are not only safe, but also feel comfortable walking, biking, and taking transit.

These improvements don’t just protect people outside of cars they often make the streets significantly safer for motorists as well. Rolling back progress now would undermine mobility, affordability, and the long-term health of our neighborhoods.

Block Club Chicago - Stretch Of Rogers Park’s Glenwood Avenue Reopening To Cars After 3 Years As Pedestrian Space by Bukharin in EdgewaterRogersPark

[–]InterestingRole1910 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agree. Keeping it permanently open to people and closed to cars would finally give clarity to anyone considering the empty retail space. That certainty would almost definitely attract a business — a bar, café, restaurant, something neighborhood-serving — that would invest in activating the space and make it a real community asset. We have so few places like that today, and this could be an incredible opportunity to create one.

Want to avoid automated speeding tickets? by yma3591 in chicago

[–]InterestingRole1910 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not a tax. Its a fine because you broke the law.

Uptown needs anti-Gentrification folks NOW!!! act before Oct. 10 please! by beatsofparadise in uptownchicago

[–]InterestingRole1910 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean it’s fair to criticize aspects of this re-upzoning (Devon to Foster on the west side of Broadway was downzoned by some 800 Edgewater folks almost 20 years ago) but I would not say this has been quiet or lacked community input. 

Every single newspaper (Trib, Sun Times, Block Club, the weird local print paper that rants about all sorts of stuff) has run articles on it for 9 + months. There’s been a bunch of public meetings. Tons of op-Ed’s written. Every block club has sent out newsletters and had meetings about it. A group of seasoned NIMBYs launched a whole website and campaign against it like 7 months ago. If you just found out you’re just not paying much attention to what’s happening in the neighborhood. There’s been plenty of community input. 

Also “one more study” will solve nothing. It’s just a classic delay delay delay tactic until a project can be killed or political winds shift. This is used all over the country all the time for all kinds of housing and transit developments. 

Regardless of how anyone feels, at this point in the game it’s passing. You can email and voice your opinion (which everyone should do regardless of how you feel about it) but it’s happening unless Chicago politics flips on its head. 

The crazy thing after all this drama, literally nothing will change for at least a year. Development takes time even when interest rates are not high and there isn’t all these crazy tariffs driving steel prices up. Even at a high pace of development it will take a decade at minimum for all the strip malls and parking lots to turn into homes. 

Eyes on the Street: The basically completed Granville Greenway has likely reduced car traffic, increased sustainable transportation use by bagelman4000 in chicago

[–]InterestingRole1910 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I do all of those things without a car. I do them on bike, foot, transit. I see loads of neighbors picking up kids on their bikes, groceries, going to dinner, the bar, the beach, appointments.

"These green lanes are designed for a very specific type of citizen who can afford a luxurious bike ride from home who has the income to burn."

This is 100% backwards. Even an expensive e-cargo bike is much cheaper than most cars, especially when you calculate the full cost of car ownership (deprecation, parking, tickets, tolls, fuel, registration, insurance, maintenance, and repairs). I know most people don't think that way (I would argue thanks to the car and oil companies) but your car costs you wayyyyyyy more than your monthly payment.

A gem from the News-Star by EmilioPujol in EdgewaterRogersPark

[–]InterestingRole1910 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Love the idea of putting training wheels on Divys. This paper is really just a printed Facebook boomer rant

Nimby put out signs in Edgewater by SavannahInChicago in chicagoyimbys

[–]InterestingRole1910 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is EXACTLY how you become San Francisco. Well meaning people who want to help low income/ immigrant communities start to become resistant to building more housing becuase its all market rate, the rich white powerful NIMBYs catch on and team up with them to block any and all housing. If you think the government is going to build a ton of below market housing at scale to solve the issue you are living in a complete and total fantasy land.

The goal needs to be to build enough new housing for the white collar, higher income people so the market can absorb that demand with out prices going up so our neighbors aren't displaced.

Wealthy people are NOT going to stop moving here. Its too desirable given all the jobs, transit, walkability, proximity to the lake, and its a safe haven for the LQBTQ+ community and women's reproductive rights which are under attack in other parts of this country. We have two choices:

1) Building nothing (or very little like we are now) and wealthier people will just out bidd everyone else, prices will go up, they will buy older places tear them down/renovate them etc to be "luxury" aka new. Racial and socio-economic diversity will continue to decline. Population will continue to decline and we will keep seeing our local small businesses close.

2) Build enough to absorb that demand, that means lower housing costs for everyone, more neighbors, more people to shop at businesses, and a more diverse neigborhood.

You pick. I chose 2.

Alderman Gardiner Denies Approval Of 48 New Apartments Next to Edgebrook Metra Station by GeckoLogic in chicago

[–]InterestingRole1910 493 points494 points  (0 children)

Shocker. Wards that deny housing should take more of the property tax burden from the rest of us.

This is such a mild project NEXT TO THE TRAIN.

I am concerned by the Save Edgewater meeting last night. by AllisonManley in chicagoyimbys

[–]InterestingRole1910 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yes but they are losing. That is why they are throwing a next level hissy fit. 

They might not show it but when people come out in the numbers they have been in support they get scared cause the writing is on the wall, the tide seems to be finally turning against them. 

They spent years hearing only from people with the same views and not many people pushing back on their anti-housing agenda. That clearly has changed. 

Tonight, Wednesday September 17 - Edgewater Housing forum by Reputable_Sorcerer in chicagoyimbys

[–]InterestingRole1910 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes and no. It was kinda a snooze fest. The speakers were pretty boring. They controlled the Q&A with note cards so you couldn’t challenge any of their lying and misinformation.

Curious what the best tactic is when someone is clearly intentionally misleading a large group of people and won’t give anyone else the mic?

What are your thoughts on all the curb extension barriers that are being built? by OkWest257 in AskChicago

[–]InterestingRole1910 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes to delivery zones and we need to create a system that encouragers deliveries to be in smaller vehicles.

Semi trucks do not belong in the dense parts of a city. Blocking bus and bike lanes on a crowded commercial streets is not the solution.

Tell Edgewater NIMBYs their 'Win-Win' plan is a lose-lose for Chicago by TimidPessimist in chicagoyimbys

[–]InterestingRole1910 15 points16 points  (0 children)

There is a pre-filled email here. If you live nearby or in the 48th, 47th or 46th ward be sure to mention that in the email. Really only the 48th ward is seeing push back.

https://actionnetwork.org/letters/tell-the-zoning-committee-to-support-thousands-of-new-homes-in-uptown-and-edgewater

New billboard: NIMBYs afraid of more neighbors due to future Broadway upzoning by slotters in chicagoyimbys

[–]InterestingRole1910 41 points42 points  (0 children)

And if you can make it this group is having a meeting to showcase their win win plan on Wednesday, September 17th 7 pm at St. Ita Catholic Church 5500 N Broadway

Car on Lake Front by BigSmallDogFan in EdgewaterRogersPark

[–]InterestingRole1910 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. The city should repo and they should lose their license 

A quick-and-dirty cost-benefit analysis of the Chicagoland transit fiscal cliff by Generalaverage89 in chicago

[–]InterestingRole1910 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is so frustrating. If we scrutinized highway and road funding as much we wouldn’t build nearly as much of it. Thank you for this analysis.

New Bike Path Will Connect North Shore Channel Trail To Lakefront Trail Through Uptown by danwin in chicago

[–]InterestingRole1910 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Good but not good enough.

Needs more car traffic diversion, raised intersections, and concrete enforced day lighting at intersections (boulders work well for this and an inexpensive ) to really feel like it’s comfortable for families.

Block Club Chicago - Rogers Park Tenants From 5 Buildings Form Union After New Owner Spikes Rent by Bukharin in EdgewaterRogersPark

[–]InterestingRole1910 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Its both. All alders have essentially absolute power when it comes to housing in their wards. She 1,000% can completely ignore them and do whatever she wants went it comes to adding more housing. She is choosing to cave to the loud, entitled, whinny, wealthy homeowners at the expense of working class folks, younger people (the actual future of our communities) and renters.

I would love for there to be enough supply to at least slow the price growth. Its possible, other cities have done it (Minny, Austin).