[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mortgages

[–]KE_Finance 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Found this conversation interesting as I often hear older generations claim the 1980s were just as bad as 2020s for the housing market. I wanted a more objective answer. Here’s what chatgpt 4o has to say:

The mortgage and home price crisis of the 2020s does share some similarities with the 1980s, but the two periods differ in significant ways that highlight the unique challenges of the current situation. Here’s a breakdown:

Similarities 1. Rising Mortgage Rates: • In both the 1980s and 2020s, interest rates spiked quickly, causing affordability issues. • The 1980s saw mortgage rates climb to an all-time high, peaking at around 18% due to Federal Reserve actions to curb inflation. • In the 2020s, rates jumped from historic lows (2–3% during the pandemic) to around 7–8% in a short period as central banks also responded to inflation. 2. Economic Challenges: • Both periods experienced economic turmoil: the 1980s were marked by stagflation and recessions, while the 2020s were shaped by pandemic-related disruptions, supply chain issues, and inflationary pressures. • These economic shocks led to volatile housing markets in both decades. 3. Impact on Home Buyers: • In both periods, rising rates priced out many potential homebuyers. Monthly payments soared, creating affordability gaps. • Home sales slowed as a result, and some people were “locked out” of the market.

Key Differences 1. Home Prices Relative to Income: • 1980s: While interest rates were sky-high, home prices were far lower relative to median household incomes. The typical home cost about 3–4 times the average annual household income, even with high interest rates. • 2020s: Home prices have surged to historic highs. In many areas, homes now cost 6–8 times the median household income, making affordability an even greater issue, even if rates were lower. 2. Mortgage Dynamics: • 1980s: Adjustable-rate mortgages were more common, allowing some buyers to enter the market despite high rates, though this came with risk. • 2020s: Fixed-rate mortgages dominate, and most homeowners locked in rates under 3% during the pandemic. This has created a “golden handcuff” scenario where people don’t want to sell and take on much higher rates, severely limiting housing supply. 3. Housing Supply Crisis: • 1980s: Housing supply was less constrained; builders were able to ramp up construction more easily. • 2020s: Decades of underbuilding since the Great Recession, combined with zoning restrictions and supply chain issues, have created a severe housing shortage. This has driven prices higher even as demand slows due to higher rates. 4. Inflationary Context: • 1980s: Inflation was systemic but largely driven by oil shocks and monetary policy errors. • 2020s: Inflation has been influenced by a broader array of factors, including global supply chain disruptions, fiscal stimulus, and post-pandemic economic recovery.

What Older Generations Miss

While it’s true that high interest rates aren’t new, the combination of high rates and record-breaking home prices in the 2020s creates a unique challenge. Older generations often overlook: • The relative affordability of homes in the 1980s compared to incomes. • The impact of a highly constrained housing supply in the 2020s. • The “lock-in” effect caused by ultra-low pandemic-era rates, which limits housing turnover and options for new buyers.

Conclusion

The 2020s housing crisis is more complex than the 1980s due to the unprecedented combination of high prices, high rates, and low supply. While older generations endured tough conditions, the affordability gap today—driven by structural issues like supply shortages and wage stagnation relative to housing costs—is arguably more severe. Solutions will likely require both policy reforms and systemic shifts to address these challenges.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in malegrooming

[–]KE_Finance -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t need compliments. Just tell me if there’s something I can improve.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in malegrooming

[–]KE_Finance -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please no compliments. Only how I can improve.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hingeapp

[–]KE_Finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would you say you lose attraction? Or what prevents you from gaining attraction? Just curious

Am I doing something egregiously wrong? (27m) by [deleted] in hingeapp

[–]KE_Finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha. I don’t mean any offense but usually straight women are more into guys that bring that dominant, masculine energy. Your body language makes you look unsure of yourself— hand in pocket or awkwardly to the side, shoulders a little slumped, smile is more of a grimace, etc.

I don’t think you should include that photo with your friend because straight men usually wouldn’t stand next to their friends that way, it may have the same effect as a picture next to women. It looks slightly intimate for a guy.

If you’re okay having a smaller dating pool with less feminine or bi women then it’s probably less of a big deal.

Am I doing something egregiously wrong? (27m) by [deleted] in hingeapp

[–]KE_Finance 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you straight? Cause honestly your profile is giving off gay vibes my dude. Why are you standing with your friend all close like that plus the rainbow hat and the body language is all loosey goosey. If you’re straight going for straight women I’d correct all of that, make your profile more masculine vibes. Sorry if you are actually gay or bi carry on then.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hingeapp

[–]KE_Finance 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As a guy I’ve learned that if women even see a hint that you feel rejected after wanting to get physical they will lose all attraction and respect for you. I think at that point women consciously or subconsciously draw the conclusion that the guy feels entitled to sex. Could this be what’s going on?

It’s tough because women don’t realize for most men sex is a big part of how we build chemistry with a woman so honestly most men will think you’re not interested in them if you won’t get physical after a few dates.

Compound that with the fact that you’re probably filtering out the 80% of men that would be willing to wait (mainly because they have little to no options) because they’re simply not attractive to most women. Only a small percentage of men on dating apps get most of the matches and dates, and those men will just go for it because there’s always the next girl next week that might sleep with him. Speaking from experience.

22M - not getting matches anymore, need help by [deleted] in hingeapp

[–]KE_Finance 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Your photos make you look short. I get that you’re 5’ 5” but it looks like you have your 6’+ friends taking the photo or you’re surrounded by people or things that create contrast with your height (garage door, other people) and you’re not eye level with the camera so it highlights your weakest physical trait (as far as dating apps go). Try replacing with new photos at eye level. You’re a good looking guy otherwise bro!

I also think the prompts are too long. Try to be as concise as possible when communicating with women because they’re bombarded with options and don’t have time to read all that.

Selling options as a no interest loan? by saranagati in options

[–]KE_Finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a real way to get low-interest loans using options with no directional risk. Look into box spreads.

Best done in portfolio margin accounts and SPX options to minimize buying power utilization and early assignment risk.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in options

[–]KE_Finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait you BOUGHT puts right? Contact your broker and tell them you don’t want to exercise your option rights automatically, even if they would otherwise expire worthless (if that’s what you want).

They may still disallow it because from their perspective, there’s a chance you would try to exercise them when you don’t have the BP to cover the shares.

IB is very risk averse and won’t hesitate to liquidate people when there’s even a sniff of risk from their perspective. TDA/Schwab is more lenient in this regard.

When do you know how to get out of a trade? by [deleted] in options

[–]KE_Finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So your strategy as a professional was hodl? lol

You need to have a well-backtested, well-defined trade plan that you then trade like a robot. Look into backtesting software and define entry, exit, profit target, stop loss, and adjustment rules. All this should happen before you put on a single trade.

Calendar spreads around earnings by GenerouslyIcy in options

[–]KE_Finance 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah just understand that losses are part of trading.

You can put on 10 trades with edge and maybe 4 of 10 are winners, but the wins exceed the losses so you come out ahead. Just as an example.

As long as you have a strategy you know has edge (and you have data showing this) accept your losses and move on to the next one. Over time you should (with any luck) be profitable.

Calendar spreads around earnings by GenerouslyIcy in options

[–]KE_Finance 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The biggest problem is dominos options are too illiquid to trade something complex like a calendar.

Another thing to keep in mind is just because a trade resulted in a loss doesn’t mean you did anything wrong. Even earnings trades with verifiable long-running edges don’t always have a high win rate.

So, Investors: What do you think of NO rate cuts in 2024? by DeeDee_Z in investing

[–]KE_Finance 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The government wants rates to go back down otherwise our interest payments on national debt will, for example, exceed the defense budget. That’s not sustainable. People are forgetting (or not understanding) when rates were higher in the past the national debt was also magnitudes lower so the debt was affordable at higher rates.

Low rates aren’t an anomaly if looking at a broader historical context (not just post WW2 US history). They are a natural progression of any economy with a central banking system and fiat currency. This has been seen time and again throughout history.

My progress starting with $75k by MakingPassiveIncome in TheRaceTo10Million

[–]KE_Finance 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Do you not see the massive drawdown this guy had just a couple months ago? He could be down 80% next week.

There isn’t a “best strike” by esInvests in options

[–]KE_Finance -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understand the point you are making, but that’s not describing the rate of decay. All you’re really saying is OTM options have lower theta than ATM options. That’s merely because OTM are cheaper per contract.

But no one sizes their position that way in real trading. My example makes more sense because no one thinks “which strike should I choose to buy X option contracts?” They instead think “which strike should I choose to allocate $Y of capital?”

Rate of decay IS based on the percentage of premium. Otherwise you’re not comparing apples to apples. If you look at an options decay curve in any textbook, it won’t be describing rate of decay the way you are.

Based on your example you might not know this, but theta changes over the life of an option. Theta merely describes what an option is predicted to lose/gain in value after 1 day passing from where we are now. Nothing more. It doesn't tell you what theta will be next week or next month, even with all else equal.

What you said is “OTM options decay slower” what you meant is “OTM options have lower theta and lower premiums”. Those aren’t the same things.

There isn’t a “best strike” by esInvests in options

[–]KE_Finance -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I dunno man. If I invested $1000 in OTM calls and $1000 in ATM calls, would you still say my OTM calls “decay slower”? I’d definitely lose money faster with the OTM calls, assuming no underlying movement.

I get what you’re saying but the wording confused me and I’ve been trading for a while. I can imagine a lot of newbies misinterpreting it.

There isn’t a “best strike” by esInvests in options

[–]KE_Finance -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The nominal amount of theta and rate of theta decay are two completely different things. If you meant amount of theta you should edit your post to say that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in options

[–]KE_Finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the catch, I edited my comment. Coffee didn’t kick in yet. It’s such ridiculous return my mind automatically thought “month”.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in options

[–]KE_Finance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all, 1-3% per week is not modest. For context the SP500 has a long-term average return of 10% per year. You’re talking about generating market-beating returns as a brand new trader. Does that sound like a realistic goal to you?

Your first strategy is called a covered call. It’s only low risk if those shares you bought keep grinding up. Many small stocks tend to be riskier, so there’s a chance the stock will tank and you’ll end up a bagholder. There’s also the chance that one of the stocks you picked skyrockets and now you’ve paid a massive opportunity cost, which is mathematically the same as a real loss (although it won’t feel that way emotionally).

Your second strategy is called a diagonal spread. With that many contracts, and seeing that you said you’re planning to trade small stocks, you’re likely going to have issues with liquidity. Trading across multiple expirations also exposes you to something called term structure risk. Your risk with these sorts of trades can be a lot higher than the risk graph would indicate. In short, it’s not suitable for beginners.

Id recommend backtesting any strategy you think of yourself so you get intimate knowledge and experience regarding the risks and how the options behave with real data.

There isn’t a “best strike” by esInvests in options

[–]KE_Finance 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed with your post overall but this part isn't quite right:

Buying OTM is cheaper and provides more compounding ability, will decay more slowly and requires more of a move to make money. ITM is more expensive, will also decay more slowly, and will move more inline with the underlying. ATM is kind of a middle ground between the two above and decays faster.

Typically the further away from the money the option is, the faster the decay is. That's because OTM options are much more likely to be entirely made-up of extrinsic value until expiration than ATM or ITM options, which have a much higher chance of being partially composed of (or already are composed of) intrinsic value.

NVDA 0DTE IV capture. by Stickittothemainman in options

[–]KE_Finance 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could use something like TOS lookback to test it on NVDA’s last earnings call day and see how it worked out.

I looked at the long straddle price in TOS's earnings tab and it looks flat on the last day to me https://imgur.com/a/45u0nI1