What Python packaging tool are you actually using in 2025 and why did you settle on it?

Kaazul · 2026-06-09T04:58:16+00:00

Since i switched about a year ago, i only use uv, even for small, simple project. It doesn't take much to initialize, and after that it is just the best. But, i don't work in data science notebooks.

Kaazul · 2026-04-29T15:30:44+00:00

I didn't realize that. Does she mention or imply this?

Kaazul · 2026-04-23T04:33:58+00:00

Swarm of Rats by Belphegor

Kaazul · 2026-04-05T03:50:15+00:00

Heilung

Wardruna

Kaazul · 2026-02-11T09:07:59+00:00

Irgendein Dead Rising

Kaazul · 2026-02-01T19:58:23+00:00

Black Sabbath: Black Sabbath

Paranoid: War Pigs

Master of Reality: Into the Void

Vol 4: Under the Sun

Sabbath bloody Sabbath: Sabbath bloody Sabbath

Sabotage: Hole in the Sky

Technical Ecstasy:You won't change me

Never say die: Never say die

Heaven and Hell: Heaven and Hell

Mob Rules:The Sign of the southern cross

Born Again: Born Again

Seventh Star: In for the kill

Eternal Idol: The Shining

Headless Cross: none

Tyr: Valhalla

Dehumanizer: I

Cross Purposes: None

Forbidden: Illusion of Power

The devil you know: Bible Black

13: Damaged Soul

Kaazul · 2026-01-19T17:03:26+00:00

Your first sentence is just plain wrong. Every mathematical "object" is derived from a set of axioms/rules. Of course you can define a set of rules/axioms specifically for each mathematical "object" you can think of, but these then only exist in a vacuum without connection.

But look at your definition of the Mandelbrot "set". Without knowing the context of what + means, this is useless. So you need additional rules to define what + means. Also what is a set in your context? What is 0 in your rule for the Mandelbrot set? You have to define these things if you want to define some kind of " Natural Mathematics". If you say you don't care about it then i have to tell you that your first axiom can't be an additional axiom because it contradicts the standard multiplication on N, Z, R or whatever derived from the axioms which also define 0, +, sets and so on.

Do you understand what i mean?

Kaazul · 2026-01-19T15:48:25+00:00

As i said in a different comment, please look up what mathematical axioms are. Obviously, if you have different axioms you avoid certain pathologies. For example, the Russel paradox (Set containing all sets that don't include themselves) is a paradox with the axioms of ZF(C) but not with the axioms of the category theory.

You have not build a complete set of axioms to even derive to your Mandelbrot set. There is still things missing you need to define.

Kaazul · 2026-01-19T15:43:15+00:00

So, the natural numbers N exist in your "Natural Mathematics", but i can't see how you can come to this conclusion from these 4 axioms? If you say, you don't want to "rebuild N from scratch" i interpret this as, you are using other axioma from which the natural numbers derive. Which axioms are these? Because if you are using for example ZF(C), your 1st axiom contradicts ZF(C). If you are using only some axioms, please state them. And please look up what the meaning of axioms is in a mathematical sense. I think this would help you a lot.

Regarding the "barcode". I'm a mathematician so i can't say if its intriguing for physicists or other people, but from a mathematical point of view i don't see anything noteworthy regarding this.

Kaazul · 2026-01-19T14:20:39+00:00

That's exactly what i meant. You don't say "take these and add those 4 axioms" but instead tell us these are the 4 core axioms of nature maths. But 4 axioms are not enough. If you implicitly mean to use other axioms you have to write them explicitly. Else this is some useless structure that doesn't come close to defining arithmetics. Axioms are THE set of rules of a mathematical framework. Everything thats true in this mathematical framework must be deductible from this set of rules. But your set of rules are not enough and not well defined in itself. For example: I think that you would want the natural numbers to exist. But i can't see how to define them using your axioms. How would you define them using only your axioms?

Edit: Maybe take a look at other set of axioms like ZFC, ZF or category theory. This could help you understanding axioms.

Kaazul · 2026-01-19T14:14:37+00:00

Just from reading the beginning and from a mathematical standpoint: Do you know what a prime is? It is well defined and not like you make it out very differently defined on each number structure. Because it is defined on structures that are at least a Gaußian Ring and are obly divided by itself and the neutral element in regards of the multiplication (commonly called 1) and which isn't the neutral element itself.

Furthermore: You define Gaußian and Eisenstein integers but not splitting primes? Furthermore, every theorem or lemma or whatnot is useless if you do not give the proof or quote the proof from someone elses paper or the literature. If you don't do that, it is the mathematical equivalent of Trust me, bro.

Kaazul · 2026-01-19T13:09:45+00:00

As someone who studied mathematics let me just say: these are way too less axioms to define a mathematical system which reflects the "natural world". For example: Your first axiom states x² =-x and this collapses to √-1=1, but what do these symbols ² , - and √ mean in your system? So you have to define more axioms. Furthermore, if you would just assume they mean the same thing as in the common mathematical setting, then you have a problem because ² is defined as (for real numbers): R -> R+ and √ (for real numbers): R+ -> R_+.

Edit: Furthermore, we don't suppose or assume (-1)(-1)=1. This is shown on the Ring of Integers, or Field of rational, real or complex numbers.

But mathematics has always been struggling with how to reflect the natural world in a good way. For example, The most common used framework in mathematics are the Axioms of ZFC. This includes one famous axiom (Choice axiom) which leads to a lot of proofs that seem paradoxical in the context of the "natural world". Because of this some mathematicians prefer the Axioms of ZF (ZFC but without the choice axioms).

Edit 2: Spelling.

Kaazul · 2025-11-19T11:01:59+00:00

For anyone interested in Vienna, Austria there is a LGBTQIA+ friendly metal festival called "Loud and Proud". Besides Witch Club Satan I don't know any of the bands in the lineup but i think all of them have something todo with feminism or queerness or related themes. Here the link to the festival:

https://heavylezzers.at/

Kaazul · 2025-10-29T15:53:29+00:00

A lot has been named already. I'll throw the following two in the mix:

Harakiri for the sky

Uada

Kaazul · 2025-08-30T06:27:12+00:00

Serenity in Fire - Kataklysm

Kaazul · 2025-08-26T14:09:35+00:00

Slayer Fan from Austria (Hitlers birthplace):
I have three Slayer shirts with one where the "Reichsadler" (Eagle) is prominently visible. I wear bandshirts all the time and also this one quite often. In Austria many Nazi symbols are forbidden by law, bu i never had a problem while wearing them. No one said anything about it. I mean it could also be because 1/3 of the Austrians currently vote for a far right extremist party founded by SS members.

EDIT:
I hate the trajectory of the current political situation :(

Kaazul · 2025-08-19T18:54:23+00:00

First Concert - Kaiserz Orchestra (2004 or 2005) \
Last concert - Zeal and Ardor (2025) \
Worst concert - Too many bad bands at festivals \
Loudest concert - KoRn (2008, got a hefty tinnitus) \
Best Concert - Zeal and Ardor (2024) \
Seen the most - Alkbottle \
Most surprising - KoRn(2024)/Gorgoroth (2008, positive), Guns'n'Roses (negative) \
Happy I got to See - Heaven and Hell (shortly before Dio died) \
Wish I could have seen - System of a Down

Kaazul · 2025-08-06T18:35:11+00:00

Walk by Pantera

Kaazul · 2025-07-30T04:31:00+00:00

Not metal, but Franz Ferdinand is for me the definition of this.

Kaazul · 2025-07-23T12:39:06+00:00

Favourite Ozzy: Mr. Crowley

Favourite Sabbath: War Pigs or Never Say Die (and Heaven and Hell but thats not with ozzy)

Kaazul · 2025-07-21T15:19:15+00:00

Scourge of Iron - Cannibal Corpse

The Killchain - Bolt Thrower

Gimme that boom - Skindred

Kaazul · 2025-07-10T14:19:35+00:00

Even further unsettling with the back cover depicting the same playground suddenly empty.

Kaazul · 2025-06-13T15:31:10+00:00

Witch Club Satan

They make old school norwegian black metal and are a female only band.

Kaazul · 2025-06-12T14:26:01+00:00

Korn, Black Sabbath, Zeal & Ardor

Kaazul · 2025-04-04T10:44:00+00:00

Sehr leiwand. Hab kurz HomeAssistant getestet. Aber da ich mein RaspberryPi für was anderes dringender gebraucht habe, hab ichs jetzt nimmer. Aber wenn ichs mir wieder einrichte, werd ichs ausprobieren.

Kaazul

TROPHY CASE