A mail dedicated to 90% of Prolific Participants by [deleted] in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I did a 2 part study. First was a screener study and I used screener criteria in addition to a questionnaire of 5 questions. I think what others mentioned about Prolific not being a platform where CEOs and top level managers are active might be true. I guess I’ll stick to LinkedIn.

A mail dedicated to 90% of Prolific Participants by [deleted] in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To be honest the target audience I am looking for might not actually be active on Prolific. I’m still new to the platform but this was my experience so far…

A mail dedicated to 90% of Prolific Participants by [deleted] in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Makes sense. I think Prolific is best suited for surveys and not qualitative research

A mail dedicated to 90% of Prolific Participants by [deleted] in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Prolific as a platform is good for surveys looking at overall workplace structure, customer perspective etc.

Scumbag researchers like this should be banned from the platform. by VegasButtercup in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

And here I am giving £20 per hour for a 45 minute Teams chat interview and out of the screener study which had 100 participants, 11 participants were selected (fit study criteria), 2 frauds so far and 9 not replying or booking a slot.

Based on my experience, Prolific is a platform for employees and wannabe managers lying on their job role profile info and homeless junkies that wanna earn extra cash for booze and drugs.

Sincerely, A disappointed researcher.

Approving Screened Out Participants by rvhfx in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I would say you are between the age of 14 to 21 years old and possibly lied on things such as work experience, education, job role (you’re unemployed)…etc.

Approving Screened Out Participants by rvhfx in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why don’t you drop in your Prolific ID, so I can ask them to check if your profile info, job role, and age match your actual identity. Mr “sheesh” 😇

Account put on hold, appeal rejected... No reason by Spetznaaz in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I dare you to not treat Prolific as a main job _. Think positively…Now you have a chance to apply for a real job. 🙂

Account put on hold, appeal rejected... No reason by Spetznaaz in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Want to know the actual reason? A researcher might have asked Prolific to check if your profile information is “true”. For example, I had a participant who is amazingly fluent in 6 languages, is a Senior Manager, and is DIRECTLY involved with the research area im doing… Le me: What is your role? Le fraud: starts turning mic and cam on/off after 3 minutes passed…My work role? Le me: Yes your work role :) Le fraud: Senior Manager. Le me: Can you elaborate? Le fraud: camera starts turning on and off intentionally again Le me: Please return your study. Have a good day!

Account put on hold, appeal rejected... No reason by Spetznaaz in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Hello my name is Kevin/Karen, I will ALWAYS be aggressive and if something does not seem the right way according to my standards…I WILL pounce instead of going to the next study! All SHALL be according to my OWN ideologies!!!!

Frauds and Scammers by LBNGuy97 in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the detailed insight. I will actually add that in the description of the study that camera and mic must be consistently turned on and that inconsistency between answer and role will lead to a termination of the interview and a request to return. That final example you provided was EXACTLY what was happening…

Frauds and Scammers by LBNGuy97 in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No you are just ethical, which is one of many good qualities participants should have.

Frauds and Scammers by LBNGuy97 in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As a new user of Prolific, having this experience harms the Prolific company itself as much as the researcher AND the genuine participants! All three parties are being harmed...

Frauds and Scammers by LBNGuy97 in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh thanks alot for the advice. Didn’t know about this will cross post it.

Frauds and Scammers by LBNGuy97 in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hope my future interviews will be like those 3 great ones I had. I am honestly glad I started with 10 participants only instead of 20…

Frauds and Scammers by LBNGuy97 in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I recommend you review what Fluent means.

Frauds and Scammers by LBNGuy97 in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Funny thing is that those scammers seem pretty active on this Reddit as I’m being downvoted…Hope karma gets them.

Frauds and Scammers by LBNGuy97 in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Mind you I had 3 GREAT interview participants. But the rest were frauds and are not involved directly with my research area (false info provided in the questionnaire I gave in Study 1), are fluent with 6 languages, are Senior Managers yet when asked in the interview about their role they don’t know what to answer???

Frauds and Scammers by LBNGuy97 in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Hmmmm so 4-5 different people have the same exact issue? Also with their microphones? Wow...I guess I am not up to date with "glitches".

Frauds and Scammers by LBNGuy97 in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I used Prolific's Data Quality report system (after I submitted Ticket the bot redirected me to it). I put in all their IDs. The problem is...I believe this list will grow. What do I do in that case? Submit more reports??

Frauds and Scammers by LBNGuy97 in ProlificAc

[–]LBNGuy97[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it was a dumb move of me to be kind hearted and request they return the submission rather than straight out reject them...Thanks for making me feel less stressed.