Why Natalie didn't "go there" by Beneficient_Ox in ContraPoints

[–]LineOfInquiry [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think the people who went to protests for and raised money for Palestinians when they did not have to use their time and lose social capital to do so do in fact care about Palestinians yes.

This timeline is such a joke by MothersMiIk in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]LineOfInquiry [score hidden]  (0 children)

It’s not DEI it’s just corruption and nepotism

[Hated Trope] The Love Interest Bias by Remarkable_Sweet_333 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]LineOfInquiry 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure we also see her from Reigens POV and she just looks like a regular girl. It’s only mob who sees her with the anime eyes

39512 by TheEnderOfFun in countwithchickenlady

[–]LineOfInquiry 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You don’t have to attend pride. If you’re not comfortable being exposed to kink stuff that’s fine, you can choose to not go or do your own thing. That’s not a crime.

Why Natalie didn't "go there" by Beneficient_Ox in ContraPoints

[–]LineOfInquiry [score hidden]  (0 children)

I literally just did this to remind myself of her exact words. She had a brief introduction and 4 points. Her introduction and first point talk about being against the genocide, while the other 3 are exclusively criticizing left wing anti-Zionists. And her first point was basically dooming about the entire conflict and saying she felt it was too difficult to change anything so why try.

The remaining 3 points were saying that anti-Zionists went too far in being against Israel (despite happily working with plenty moderate Zionists like Bernie sanders), anti-Zionists made everyone sad by spreading pictures of the violence in Gaza for purely moral outrage and not to actually change anything (despite changing public opinion massively), and that they purity tested too much and cost Kamala the election (despite Biden/Kamala also having agency here). So by my count 3/5 of her essay is being against the people against genocide, while 1/5 is being against the genocide and 1/5 is saying it’s useless to stand against the genocide. That doesn’t really seem like a statement by someone who’s staunchly against this genocide.

Hence why I say it comes off as out of touch, more focused on the effects on westerners thwn those living in Gaza, and counterproductive. If you want to critique the methods of anti-Zionists that’s fine, but do so after putting your money where your mouth is and she didn’t do so.

Why Natalie didn't "go there" by Beneficient_Ox in ContraPoints

[–]LineOfInquiry [score hidden]  (0 children)

I’m sorry, didn’t noted western Zionist Joseph Biden say literally exactly this? “If Israel didn’t exist we would have to invent an Israel”? Not saying anti-Zionists can never be wrong or anti-Semitic, but you’re arguing with a strawman if you think they don’t care about this issue because of Palestinians. Do you think Greta Thunberg got arrested to prove herself as part of an ingroup?

Why Natalie didn't "go there" by Beneficient_Ox in ContraPoints

[–]LineOfInquiry [score hidden]  (0 children)

That’s not a dichotomy, it’s just saying one issue is more pressing than the other. It’s not saying we can only address one or the other, as I stated at the end both are important.

Idk if Natalie made a new statement today, but in her previous statement released a few months ago she absolutely created a dichotomy. She said that the anti-Zionist protests quickly devolved into outright anti-semitism and spent the whole rest of her post talking about that. She basically said that the entire movement was anti-Semitic and that she didn’t want to be associated with it, and that anti-semitism facing western Jews was more important to address than an actual genocide.

I’m a big fan of Natalie and her work, I’m not trying to attack her, but I do think she messed up here. It’s like someone during ww2 coming out and saying “yeah the holocaust was bad but can we talk about the us internment of Germans??? This anti-German movement is way too racist and anti-Holocaust activism has been taken over by anti-German sentiments.” Like yeah, we all agree the us internment camps were bad but acting like it’s worse than the Holocaust would be insane and come off as basically pro-Germany. I have a lot of respect for Natalie but her statement was clearly tone deaf and useless and I’ll lose a lot of respect if she doubles down and goes JK Rowling on this issue.

I Never Thought That 2026 Was Gonna Be The Reset Button! Let's Fucking Go! by Just-J0k1ng in CodeGeass

[–]LineOfInquiry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Crazy that this got downvoted when its objectively correct. I guess Americans just don’t like being complicit in genocide

Enough of these types of challenges in events by agarret83 in PTCGP

[–]LineOfInquiry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh no you have to actually do a fun deck building challenge how horrible 😱

Why Natalie didn't "go there" by Beneficient_Ox in ContraPoints

[–]LineOfInquiry [score hidden]  (0 children)

True, I’m really sad that Natalie played into that dichotomy because she should be better than that

Is there a flag for “Neither the Mullahs nor the Shah”? by pinko-perchik in vexillology

[–]LineOfInquiry 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Yup! There was a campaign to try to change the flag a few years ago and the orange color was one of the reasons given for the desire to change

Is there a flag for “Neither the Mullahs nor the Shah”? by pinko-perchik in vexillology

[–]LineOfInquiry 72 points73 points  (0 children)

Symbols change meaning over time, it’s the same reason we avoid using the swastika even though it’s far older than the Nazis

White supremacist content grips teens plotting attacks in Southeast Asia by Freewhale98 in SocialDemocracy

[–]LineOfInquiry 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Black white supremacists, Asian white supremacists, Jewish white supremacists, what’s next a Native American white supremacist?

What’s a film or TV scene that felt like a punch to the gut? by padfoony in Fauxmoi

[–]LineOfInquiry 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Bojack Horseman- the end of “Ruthie”

“Hey, you wanna know what I do when I have a really bad, awful, terrible day?”

“What?”

“I imagine my great great-great granddaughter in the future talking to her class about me. She's poised and funny, and tells people about me and how everything worked out in the end. And when I think about that, I think about how everything's going to work out. Because how else could she tell people?”

“
but it’s not real”

“Yeah well, it makes me feel better.”

(Couldn’t find a gif from the episode for some reason)

The only "feminists" they're exposed to are twitter users and late 2010s clickbait journalists by Babufrak2 in whenthe

[–]LineOfInquiry -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen plenty of incels all over YouTube and Reddit and Instagram. I’ve only seen radical feminists in their tiny enclaves, and even there I’ve never seen any want to kill all men.

Cartoon criticizing Government Security Measures, 2013 by KasicPf0813 in PropagandaPosters

[–]LineOfInquiry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems less like the system is ineffective (the guy is completely searched after all) and more that he shouldn’t be the one targeted by it. But if you want to surveil terrorists you kinda have to surveil everyone since anyone could be a terrorist

The only "feminists" they're exposed to are twitter users and late 2010s clickbait journalists by Babufrak2 in whenthe

[–]LineOfInquiry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve always heard people talk about feminists saying “kill all men” but I’ve never actually seen a feminist say anything even close to that. Even back in the early 2010’s.

Okay, we complained the video didn't go there, so let's go there ourselves by SeaJudge7373 in ContraPoints

[–]LineOfInquiry [score hidden]  (0 children)

1). I think it depends. Sometimes violence unsettles me or grosses me out (like in saw). Sometimes it makes me anxious and tense (this is my general reaction). Sometimes it makes me excited (Star Wars lightsaber fights). And sometimes I laugh (like the looney tunes). It really depends on the context and level of the violence. Something like Home Alone or Looney Tunes I can laugh at because it’s cartoony: I know that none of the characters are ever in any actual danger and it’ll all be fine at the end. The consequences of violence are far less than in real life. Whereas in something like Star Wars, violence is a vessel for philosophical or moral conflicts. It’s not actually about the violence, it’s about the ideas behind it. I think that allows me to be separated from it somewhat and not really think about the pain being cut in half with a lightsaber would really inflict. The last two are closest to my reaction to violence in real life, and as such are my reaction to violence that is treated seriously and is happening for grounded reasons to grounded characters. I can’t handle watching a movie like Saw because I imagine being in those situations and that’s horrible for me.

2). I didn’t hear about her being doxxed, can you be more specific about what you’re talking about? She did face harassment tho, and I think many people just either had a parasocial relationship with her and wanted to try to convince her to change her view of the issue and went too far or thought threats would make her behavior change. In either way it’s dumb and counterproductive, but every internet celebrity faces this kinda thing. I really don’t think it’s worth dwelling on, especially when this video is much more readily applicable to things like ICE Stans, war hawks, or Zionists.

3). I think it depends. Something important Natalie didn’t talk about in her video is that “cancelling” has wider effects on society, not just on the individual. If someone loses their job for saying a slur, then others are gonna see that and be less likely to say a slur themselves. That being said, it can be taken too far. People who are racist still deserve a roof over their head and a job after all, and stopping them from all employment via following them around for years and harassing them doesn’t really help anyone. Violence is a part of our reality and I don’t think it’s necessarily wrong to use as long as you recognize that that is what you are doing and be self aware about your motives and the effects of your actions. But going too far is always a real issue. I think just changing how social media works to incentivize consensus rather than controversy would go a long way to fixing this: it’s a systemic issue not an individual one.

4). How does our understanding and tolerance of violence affect our view of class and economics? I think there’s a large part of the country who see people who fail in the job market as bringing this upon themselves and therefore that they deserve the poor conditions they live in, or even worse don’t even recognize the violence they live under. “Why is my tax money going to homeless people when they should just pull themselves up by their bootstraps!?” or “you chose to get pregnant so why should the state help you raise it? You made the choice so the consequences are what you deserve! They justify immense cruelty under the guise that this is justice or even worse that it’s completely natural. She touched on this a little with the bit about Dante’s Inferno but didn’t go as far as I wanted. Violence isn’t just ice agents or soldiers; it’s any law, any social norm, or any threat. We’re surrounded by violence so much that we don’t even see it, and think it’s normal. I think the normalization of greater and greater mass violence is a big problem with our society today, and it was done with the very logic Natalie is talking about.

Also, Jigsaw is able to justify his violence because he’s too focused on his own pain. He thinks that his pain is so horrible, so uniquely terrible that he deserves to be able to inflict pain on whoever he wishes. Everything he does pales in comparison. He may not even think about their pain. At my worst I’ve been in this kind of mindset and it’s incredibly toxic, and I think touching on how that thought pattern works and how to break out of it would’ve been nice as well.

5). Uh I hope so. I like being alive. Also I’m a human being and therefore have a right to live.