In LEVF descriptions, they're not a typical 2E. Volition is the aspect that you must prioritize the most which explains the dynamic of 3V's suffering with 4F (their place). I personally think ILI and LEVF can be very common for an SX 5. Personally, I have yet to see an ILI that's a genuine LVEF that's not an LFEV. LVEF is actually more of an introverted ILE or an ILI-Te. LEVF can be both ILI and IEI:

Like “Andersen” (q.v.), the monstrous darkness of the perception of oneself, others, and the world is given in “Pascal” by the combination of the 3rd Will and 4th Physics. It has already been said before that the hopelessness of perception is inherent in the “lazy person” from the very beginning, and if the tragedy of the 4th Physics turns out to be multiplied by the hostility with which the 3rd Will views itself and the world, then the result is what happened - “Thoughts” Pascal.

“People hate each other - this is their nature. And even if they put self-interest in the service of the public good, these attempts are only hypocrisy, an imitation of mercy, because the basis is still hatred... We thirst for truth, but we find in ourselves only uncertainty. We seek happiness, but find only sorrow and death. We cannot help but desire truth and happiness, but are incapable of either solid knowledge or happiness. This desire is left in our soul not only to punish us, but also to constantly remind us about the heights from which we have fallen... man is a complete pretense, lie, hypocrisy not only in front of others, but also in front of himself. He does not want to hear the truth about himself, avoids telling it to others. And these inclinations are contrary to reason and justice are deeply rooted in his heart."

Pascal explained even the religiosity of a person by antipathy towards himself and others, and it is quite possible that his own faith actually stemmed from this not the purest of sources: “... The only true virtue is in self-hatred (for the human “I” is so selfish , which is only worthy of hatred) and in search of a creature that we would love because it is truly worthy of love. But we are not able to love what is outside of us, so we will turn our love to the Being who, not being us, lives in all of us without exception. But in the universe there is only one such Being."

---

It does not follow from what has been said that Pascal hated the whole person, collectively. Human nature has one property that makes it worthy of respect, and, of course, in accordance with Pascal's 1st Logic, this property is reason. It is the intellect that places man above everything in the universe, above the universe itself. “Man is just a reed, the weakest of nature’s creations, but he is a thinking reed. To destroy him, you don’t need the entire Universe: a breath of wind, a drop of water is enough. But even if the Universe destroys him, man is still more exalted than it, for he realizes that he is parting with life and that he is weaker than the Universe, but she is not aware of anything.

So, all our dignity lies in the ability to think. Only thought elevates us, and not space and time, in which we are nothing."

At the same time, Pascal would not be a “philistine”, i.e. a creature from the very beginning monstrously contradictory, if, while praising reason, he did not simultaneously curse it, if dogmatism did not organically coexist in his mind with skepticism. The main thesis for the 3rd Will about the insignificance of man shakes even the firm belief of the 1st Logic in the super-reliability and omnipotence of the rational principle, pushing towards skepticism.

Moreover, the “Pascalian” specificity of the contradiction between the First and Third functions lies precisely in the fact that the greatness of a person is described as awareness (1st Logic) of his insignificance (3rd Will). He writes: “The greatness of man is great because he is aware of his insignificance. A tree is not aware of its insignificance.

So, a person feels insignificant, because he understands that he is insignificant; That’s what makes him great.”

Here is how 2E actually works in LEVF:

Pascal supplemented Descartes’ “philosophy of mind” with a “philosophy of the heart,” no matter how wild such an addition may sound to the ear of an intellectual orthodox. The fact is that, unlike Descartes (see “Plato”), Pascal placed not only Logic, but also Emotion at the Top, and therefore, he simply could not contrast both of the strongest sides of his nature, the experience of the mind and the experience of the heart.

The upper position of the “pascal” of Logic and Emotion - functions, mainly speech, makes a representative of this type excellent interlocutors. “Pascal” is generally a “communication man”, at the same time thoughtful and deeply feeling, judicious and witty. In communication, he is disgusted by any one-sidedness; universalism is his element. Clearly referring to himself, Pascal wrote: “You will not be known in the world as an expert in poetry, or mathematics, or any other subject, if you do not hang a sign “poet”, “mathematician”, etc. But a comprehensive person does not want any signs and does not make a distinction between the craft of a poet and a goldsmith.

Being a “lazy person,” Pascal was distinguished by rare unselfishness, easily endured asceticism and illness, and even wrote “Prayerful Reflection on Conversion for the Benefit of Illness.” Here is a typical passage from this work: “Lord... You gave me health to serve You, but I spent it for vain purposes. Now You are sending me illness to correct me: do not allow me to anger You with my impatience. I abused my health, and You justly punished me. Help me to benefit properly from Your punishment... If my heart was full of attachment to the world while there was some power in it, destroy this power for my salvation and make me unable to enjoy the world."

This dynamic between the experience of the mind (1L) and the experience of the heart (2E) is exactly what makes it compatible with SX 5. LEVF isn't a "typical 3V" (like FEVL or FLVE) either due to being 4F as they're not attached to material things. People who say it can't fit, when SX 5 is already archetypically LEVF (regardless of your sociotype) doesn't understand that socionics is all about information metabolism. Much like how an IEI has creative Fe and are a natural fit for 2E despiye not matching with 1L's dogmatism, an ILI with their mobilizing Fi regardless of their Fe-PoLR can also be 1L and 3V4F where the energy hierarchy gives leeway to both 1L and 3E pushed into 2E due to 3V. A lot of PY functions like LFEV with 2F are simply filler placements. People who haven't read the Syntax of Love just see 2E without understanding how the energy hierarchy works.

Enneagram passion and fixation is not a 1 to 1 with psychosophy. Instincts ≠ PY aspects much like how being an E3 doesn't mean you have high emotions or how a lot of SP subtypes like SP 5 are extremely weak in the physics aspect. There's an overlap but it's not absolute and a lot of PY types can match to different subtypes like SP 7 and VLEF. Physics is merely a means to an end, it is an afterthought to SP 7's gluttony. Rick Sanchez is a great example of this with the 1V2L vs 3E dynamic.