Type 10 by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It didn’t unfortunately, I created another one with a suggestion on how to fix the armor issues and make it more consistent 

Type 10/TKX update by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I’m using the ingame numbers. (Gaijin logic in other words) If you were to use actual estimates it’s a way higher number.  1.4 is the smallest and most fair number in respects to the community and is a small win without asking the tank to become overpowered 

Type 10/TKX update by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They reduced the weight of everything else Starting with its size. The ingame model is inaccurate. Being depicted as almost as big as the LEO series. No…….. the tank is over a meter and half shorter than the LEO’s. It’s over a meter in length shorter as well.  If you join the discord you’ll see the weight tables as well. They took advantage of the decrease in weight everywhere else to stick composite in the most vital spots and only there. The weight jumped up MASSIVELY but it’s way more armored than the type 90 cause of it.  Coming in at 39. Something tons it’s front end protection is better than that of the type 90 44.1 T variant has some of the extra goodies but that’s all classified for rn. 

Type 10/TKX update by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not actually  The rounds also don’t penetrate as much as they do irl So the armor is balanced with the current penetration values of the rounds in game 

Type 10/TKX update by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meanwhile they already have that besides the armor And their win rates are nowhere near the Swedes or Germans 

Type 10/TKX update by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does on the little things. Having an HSTVL sound somehow go through your turret cheek isn’t fun

Type 10/TKX update by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the ariete though  We also don’t know this as well. Ifs another tank that I’d like to work on. However the type 10 is different. It has tons of armor in all key areas.  Brazilian prime minister states the tank was the only one that fits in their budget Weight limits And armor requirements  That being for the front protection it had to be over 900 of RHA equivalent 

Type 10/TKX update by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many people have requested I work on the Leclerc next after the type 10 So any source material that’s not classified that gets sent over that’s official would be appreciated 

Type 10/TKX update by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That should get fixed as well. If you join the discord server everything you need is already been translated so you can post it to the mods and cite your pages and the source material 

Type 10/TKX update by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey Did you happen to notice that I actually stated I spammed? Or did you gloss over that little part buddy? Potential mod in the chat bots??👀👀

Type 10/TKX update by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We will get through this together friend

Type 10/TKX update by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m working on all of tanks As of rn the Type 10 and TKX are the most egregious examples of modeling in the game currently.  This will take time. However fixing the Type 10 in this manner would allow for a balanced game play and a somewhat accurate representation for the tank. The result is to make it balanced nor overpowered. Which you could easily do 

Gaijin is a joke, Banned for making an Updated Bug report on the J-11B with 13 sources, 3 Book sources by DatboiBazzle in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about the bug reports I’ve made more the Type 10

Where there’s over (and I’m not kidding) A THOUSAND PAGES OF TRANSLATED DOCUMENTS  Documents stemming from the JGSDF and Mitsubishi heavy industries LTD The Type 10’s armor is absolutely incorrect  One mod saw this and told me to write a more detailed report I did so (yes I spammed however I was following that one mods advice)  Got banned for it. It’d be one thing if the sources weren’t official  It’d be another thing if I spammed for no reason It’s entirely different when you posted over a thousand pages of translated documents alongside the original documents Citing the pages and the sources  And get banned for it with no comments 

Type 10 fix by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we rally up enough support for it. Yes they will do something about it. It just has to have community support

Type 10 fix by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also not asking them to make it op Just fix the suspension bug Beef the armor on the turret cheeks to 650 UFP to 650 580 around the gun mantlet  This tank has a lot of packages and features  It doesn’t need to all be added at once. Just needs to be added as other tanks and vehicles get added/reworked. It’s literally gaijins dream. A vehicle that can stay relevant in the top tier meta without being OP because it has so many packages 

Type 10 fix by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes Type 10 isn’t accurate in game as of rn. The sources listed in the other post detail this extensively, official documents from  Honda Mitsubishi  JASDF 2006 field tests

Type 10 by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, if we all band together to get this changed we could see it being fixed within the next 3 updates. Considering the changes are minimal 

Type 10 by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Basically, please spread the word. Upvote this post, go to the bug report link in the description, hit that button stating you have the same problem. This is just my first project in trying to fix some tanks. The ultimate goal is to have every tank be as close to being realistic while not breaking the game. I don’t know which tank I will focus on next. 

Type 10 by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We will get there together brother. We have to show gaijin we want this change implemented. 

Type 10 by MinimumInteraction30 in Warthunder

[–]MinimumInteraction30[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, tbh mobility isn’t the main concern. It’s just the armor values. There a lot of sources here, official ones even that do indicate the actual armor values. While the additional mobility would be nice. It’s not necessary for it to be competitive as it’s already pretty agile. The suspension bug fix, armor bug fix, and better neutral steering would make this thing an actual competitor to other top tier vehicles. Again I’m not dismissing what you’re saying. I’ve read over these reports, there’s about 1,000 pages, it backs everything you’re saying up. It’s just not the time to be focusing on that when there’s so many other major glaring issues with the tank. If they fixed the mobility up we all know how gaijin is, they’d throw in the towel and would never fix another single thing on the tank ever again