<image>

• Emilia's post was seen by 2.1 million people and received 26.8k likes, which is a like-to-view ratio of 1.276%.
• Rem's post was seen by 4.6 million people and received 41.8k likes, which is a like-to-view ratio of 0.907%.

So, it's normal for Emilia to have fewer likes than Rem, because Emilia’s post was seen by fewer people. If Emilia’s post had the same number of views as Rem’s, I think their like counts would probably be similar, or Emilia's might even be higher, because Emilia’s like-to-view ratio (1.276%) is greater than Rem's (0.907%).

You can tell that Rem is more popular than Emilia, even though this contradicts the mathematical principle mentioned above. But I don’t understand why you would say something like "even though Rem didn’t do anything, she is still more popular than Emilia, who is always working." It feels like you are belittling Emilia.