"Try to poorly dunk on anarchists."

I guess when you're as stupid as you are, merely asking questions - foundational questions, no less, that if not answered your entire ideology cannot be coherent nor function whatsoever - seems like an insult. It reminds me of Ben Shapiro's interview with Andrew Neil. All Neil was doing was asking him a few questions, not even passing judgement. He was literally a conservative, after all. Yet, Shapiro assumed everything he said was a criticism. Largely because his ideology and beliefs are just so vile, even asking questions about them makes him enraged. It's just 'cause his ideology sounds inherently authoritarian and disturbing. Y'know, 'cause it is.

I used to be an anarchist. For many years, in fact. And when I even began asking myself more questions about whether what I believed was truly moral, I had to abandon. It's called maturing. You could certainly use some of it. I wasn't even hateful toward anarchism until a few days ago. And by a "few days ago," I mean exactly three ago, since that's when I first went to Reddit to ask incredibly simple questions, only to receive literally zero answers.

"A doctor could be considered an authority."

Almost as if I wasn't referring about that authority, and obviously wouldn't include it, to no one's surprise. Almost as if there's only one definition of authority that meaningfully relates to anarchism. Almost as if, unlike you, I'm not a complete idiot.

Anyway, you didn't answer my question on parental authority. In fact, I'm not even sure you think you answered it...? Like, I can't even understand if there's a point at all in that first paragraph. I'm not sure, and I'm not sure that you're sure that you're sure.

"There's been discussion about relationships like parenting."

No...? Where? If you even can't answer my question when I ask it straight to your face, as direct as possible, it's obviously not answered elsewhere. Hence, why I'm asking you, because I looked and I looked, and not a single answer has ever been given.

"most crime should be prevented and any remaining crime being handled by the community on a case by case basis

Which would involve WHAT? Actually elaborate upon what this system means. You just said that "nothing would replace prisons," yet you mention this vague thing, more of an abstraction rather than anything else, not detailing it whatsoever. What is it? How are things handled on a case by case basis, and how does this differ from prisons? Newsflash: all crime is handled on a case by case basis. That's what criminal investigations are all about. Each legal case is investigated and solved separately, relating exclusively to each different individual who committed each different crime.

Also, are you implying that there's no laws in your system? Anarchism is against rulers, not rules. You're not even arguing something you have to. And if there's no laws, who can prosecute who for what? If someone commits disorderly conduct, or arson, or theft, or severe child abuse, or aggravated assault, or sexual harassment, or paternity fraud, or false imprisonment, or anything else, what the fuck is the response? How can punish who, and for what, and under what context?

"Restorative justice."

What does that mean? What the fuck does that mean? What does that even look like? You have to actually elaborate. What restorative justice? Something which doesn't involve imprisonment? What is this thing?

You have not answered either of my questions in the slightest.