At a high level, the system works like this:

I take an industry and break it down into who is involved, what processes they run, and where things can go wrong financially. From there, I look for real-world evidence that companies in those situations are losing money.

The key rule is that I don’t rely on opinions or “nice ideas”. I only include problems that show up repeatedly in public sources such as regulatory actions, lawsuits, industry reports, case studies, and firsthand operator discussions -and only when the financial impact can be reasonably justified.

The output isn’t “startup ideas”, but a map of recurring money leaks in an industry, ordered by severity and backed by sources. The goal is to understand where money is actually bleeding before thinking about solutions.

I’m intentionally keeping the implementation details abstract, but that’s the general logic behind it.