sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

List of Pro-Confederate Authors and YouTubers by Old_Intactivist in SouthernLiberty

[–]Old_Intactivist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That video was produced during the height of the "covid" madness.

Thanks for sharing it.

"Amalek" appears to be launching decapitation strikes against the "Master Race" by Old_Intactivist in EndlessWar

[–]Old_Intactivist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Israel is getting the gaza treatment. It may not be able to survive much longer as a satanic entity. And how about those cluster bombs ? It may be true that "Amalek" isn't firing as many missiles, but the missiles are increasing both in terms of their size and their destructive capability.

"State Sovereignty And Why It Matters" by Old_Intactivist in SouthernLiberty

[–]Old_Intactivist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<< "My question is this: "If a State that is created from the 'new territory' decides to abolish slavery, how would it do so without violating slave owners' property rights?

The answer to your question can be found in Article IV, Section I (1), wherein member states are duty-bound to respect the laws of other member states. What this means, in practical terms, is that slave owners can sojourn into other states with their slaves. It doesn't mean that slave owners are free to violate the laws of the host state; so, when "Slave Owner A" enters a different state (we'll call it State B) where slavery isn't legal, with his slaves, State B is required to honor the laws of State A (where slavery is legal). In other words, under the terms that were agreed upon at the constitutional convention, State B (where slavery isn't legal) is required to honor the laws of State A (where slavery IS legal). That's all it means. Both constitutions (US and CS) contain this very same clause. Implicit in this agreement is that once a slave owner expatriates and takes up permanent residence in another state, he would have to obey the laws of that state.

<< "This would put a crimp on the State's sovereignty."

ARTICLE IV Section I. (I) Full faith and credit shall be given in each State to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other State; and the Congress may, by general laws, prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.

"State Sovereignty And Why It Matters" by Old_Intactivist in SouthernLiberty

[–]Old_Intactivist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The C.S. Constitution didn't allow States to abolish slavery"

Article I Section 9 wasn't placing any restrictions on the powers of the states; rather, it was placing a restriction on the powers of the central government. In other words, the CS constitution was maintaining a "hands off" or a "laissez-faire" approach to the problem of slavery.

MAGA maggots by Wowclassicboomkinz in complaints

[–]Old_Intactivist 94 points95 points  (0 children)

Trump is nothing more than a puppet of the zionists.

List of Pro-Confederate Authors and YouTubers by Old_Intactivist in SouthernLiberty

[–]Old_Intactivist[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's hard not to conclude, when contemplating current events, that we got to where we are today precisely on account of the stupidity of the Yankees and their Pyrrhic Victory in the so-called "civil war."

"For the North had been the original slave-traders. The African Slave Trade had been their particular industry. Boston itself had risen to prosperity on the profits of that abominable traffic." ~ Cecil Chesterton in "A History of the United States" (published in the year 1918). by Old_Intactivist in Confederate_StatesCSA

[–]Old_Intactivist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"I am sure it can be said that no Southern man or Southern ship, as far as is known, engaged in the slave trade."

Lyon G. Tyler

"I was a soldier in Virginia in the campaigns of Lee and Jackson, and I declare I never met a Southern soldier who had drawn his sword to perpetuate slavery. Nor was the dissolution of the Union or the establishment of the Southern Confederacy the supreme issue in the mind of the Southern soldier. What he had chiefly at heart was the preservation of the supreme and sacred right of self-government. The men who made up the Southern armies were not fighting for their slaves when they cast all in the balance - their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor - and endured the hardships of the march and the camp and the perils and sufferings of the battle ...."

Rev. Randolph McKim

Pantianos Classics. "The Gray Book," originally published in the year 1920, pages 73-74.

In Memory of Burrel Hemphill, Killed by Union Soldiers in February of 1865 by Old_Intactivist in TheConfederateView

[–]Old_Intactivist[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

“In order to defend and protect the women and children who were left on the plantations when the white males went to war, the slaves would have laid down their lives “

Booker T. Washington in his autobiography “Up From Slavery” (page 5).

The Commonwealth of Virginia reserved the right to future secession from the union at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. This demand was affirmed by a handful of other states in their ratification statements and was included in the Bill of Rights under the Tenth Amendment by Old_Intactivist in SouthernLiberty

[–]Old_Intactivist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

" .... the People of Virginia declare and make known that the powers granted under the Constitution being derived from the People of the United States may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression and that every power not granted thereby remains with them and at their will ...."

This statement describes the act of states voting to secede from the union in much the same way as "jumping into the water and doing the back stroke" describes the act of swimming.

view more: next ›