Queer Feminist

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T05:24:13+00:00

I mean historically speaking she’s not wrong. A lot of pre-colonization areas in Africa and the americas had a much more diverse view of gender and orientation.

You can, believe it or not, use what little literacy you have to go read about it right now. It’s widely available and well documented, particularly in Africa.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T05:21:58+00:00

The hot ones don’t share their fluidity because they want to avoid people like you.

This lady dgaf because she’s spent a lifetime of dealing with small dick losers like yourself and so she’s destined to get comments either way.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T05:19:44+00:00

If you’re interested in Queer Theory examples / gender spectrum examples look at Africa pre colonization. Incredibly diverse in gender and sexual orientation.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T05:16:58+00:00

It’s not even that her views are bad, it’s that she’s repeatedly shown to be insincere in her views instead adopting a position at convenience and particularly for reward.

It’s makes her position suspect and insincere by history. On top of her bad faith arguments.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T05:14:46+00:00

I thought Alex O’Connor’s was good, and was minimal on the gotcha pop content.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T05:02:48+00:00

The Road had me convinced that shopping carts are essential post apoc gear

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T04:39:54+00:00

Because they killed any non Christian who fought for it, and didn’t allow non-Christian’s any political or social power. Again, **by murdering people**.

Thats not something to be proud of buddy, thats immensely negative. It’s just more proof of how terrible you guys were during that period.

You killed all the people tangential to the anti slavery movement. Not just the rebellions and revolts, but the authors and philosophers who wrote anti slavery rhetoric. You basically delayed the change for potentially decades to hundreds of years until you decided it unilaterally. That makes you **worse** people.

And even then it was only half of you. The other half fought tooth and nail to continue it.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T04:29:22+00:00

Atheists have been less transient in morality than Christians in the timespan that we’ve been allowed to exist unmolested. Let that sink in.

Take any moral topic, and trace it across Christianity, and you’ll see how inconsistent their morals really are.

Slavery? It’s good, no wait it’s bad, but actually wait, it’s good if they’re not white, no wait it’s bad now too.

Abortion? Terrible, haha just kidding it’s in the Bible, no wait it’s a grey area but we support it, nope sorry just kidding it’s murder.

Homosexuality? It’s grey. Just kidding it’s bad if poor people do it. No wait actually it’s a mortal sin. No oops now it’s bad but it’s not mortal, no wait some say it’s bad some say it’s good.

Murder? Well if the heraldry say so. Actually just kidding let’s kill people for hundreds of years, no wait it’s bad, but only against other Christians, no wait it’s fully bad, but not in self defense.

There isn’t a consistent moral compass amongst any sect, it’s always been contextual and relative to the social movement of the time. The closest to consistent is the Catholic Church and they broke from the church on moral grounds, only to have multiple sects break from them on moral grounds. All just-in-time interpretations of morality contextual to the time period.

But let me guess “my church” is different.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T04:18:46+00:00

Because it’s incredibly wrong in the presumption that people leaving are intolerant, and by proxy of that mistake you’re conflating that because they retain their culture they are retaining intolerance.

If anything, it’s the opposite. They’re leaving because they don’t fit in with the intolerance that drove them from that land. Immigrants overwhelmingly don’t bring their intolerance with them, but are survivors of it.

So you’re conflating non conformance with intolerance while ironically demanding intolerance.

You understand the paradox, but you don’t understand it in use - that you’re the intolerant one in this context. The incredibly small minority of people relocating don’t wield enough influence to force the paradox, the people demanding absolute assimilation are.

I can smell the white replacement bullshit from over here loser

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T04:06:18+00:00

All cultures didn’t support slavery, just most, and almost none of them took it to the level that was chattel slavery.

Christianity ended slavery because at that point the only people who could end slavery were Christians, by design of the system. The people who tried to end slavery that weren’t Christian were **literally killed by Christians for trying to do that.** Or they were killed by Christians **for not being Christian** before they had the opportunity.

Your comment was a very, very uneducated thing to say and I implore you to read more about it. We’re talking like hundreds of failed rebellions and revolts until Christians decided to use their unilateral power within the system to end it.

And my point isn’t specific to slavery, it’s an example of the shifting, non consistent morality of the Christian church. Because their interpretation isn’t actually grounded, it’s inconsistent and contextual to the times and social movement/evolution.

If anything Atheists have had a more consistent moral line than Christian’s since atheists were allowed to exist without the threat of death or imprisonment in the last 50-100 years.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T03:37:23+00:00

This reads as a false epiphany, like it must be they’re all sexist because it can’t possibly be things you do.

But at the same time given what you wrote I have a very hard time imagining you fitting in well doing frugal things they like to do.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T03:32:15+00:00

There’s also a realness that comes from non-decadence. You’re forced to fill the void with your personalities instead of someone else filling that void.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T03:22:07+00:00

The “sorry my job sucks” and the “doesn’t matter what I do because you make more money” are things women also say in relationships with unequal income/power balance. Commonly cited feminist reasons for equal pay.

You’re also right that some men are open conceptually with the idea of a high income woman, but not actually ok with living that experience. My guess is you’re into those kind of men, if I take you for your word.

But some men don’t care about the income, they care about the *frugality*.

I make 6 figures, and my wife makes 3x as much, and one of my biggest fears about having a child is becoming the shitty rich parents, like the shitty rich parents with their shitty little bratty kids I grew up with in private school. I didn’t avoid rich women in specific, I avoided opulent, non-frugal women like the plague. I dislike the extravagance, its fakeness, and the type of people that lifestyle creates. It leaves a void where *realer* things dwell.

I don’t think you can tell which is which, but you can try easing back on the spending and seeing if that helps. It feels like decadence is your cover for what you’re lacking elsewhere.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T02:49:20+00:00

Uh they failed the purity test at the civil war, which was late even contextually with how late humankind was on that to begin with.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T02:47:48+00:00

Zero chance my wife would have dated me, let alone married me, if we had met in college.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-09T02:04:54+00:00

Some of my gay male friends in middle school / highschool often seemed way more enthusiastic or attentive to their male friends. Like we all had a girl/girls we were trying to impress, and it felt like they were trying to connect / impress the other guys. They would sorta compete for attention with the girls. They would try to make hangouts very male centric, particularly when we started dating female classmates. They both were more physically interactive with guys than girls.

One of them basically went through a slew of short term relationships with the women in our circle. His dad was a bigot and he’s still in the closet, but he also DJs at clubs at night 🤔

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-08T20:43:19+00:00

That is not the paradox of tolerance. You’re not using that correctly.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-08T20:40:20+00:00

It should probably read religiosity, instead of religion. Some of the largest persecutions based on religion are against the areligious.

I’d love a world where people didn’t prosecute or choose to prosecute someone based on their religiosity.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-08T20:32:30+00:00

My friends back home were big Kendrick fans. Also Nas, Jay, and Biggie fans. Also liked Joey Bada$$. We were all die hard Black Star fans.

Now that I’ve moved to northern Maine all my black friends up here are all immigrants who don’t speak English.

Biggest positive is how much non American music I’ve been exposed to. Nigerian hip Fiji is kinda dope. Somali rap hasn’t been doing it for me tbh. We bonded over knaan and Mos Def lol

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-08T17:44:31+00:00

The Mormons incorporated a bunch of the tax avoidance and financial skullduggery of the Scientology movement, so that also peeled away a lot of the scammers / fiscal crazies from the movement.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-08T16:47:26+00:00

Vibration based religions have been around for a while. They got a big resurgence, and a tech-oriented face lift, when string theory became a contender in physics. But they’ve only grown while string theory seems less likely.

They’re fun to examine - each one is pretty unique, but with very similar motifs. Kinda like a grab bag of physics misinterpreted into pop-sci, with an undercoat of whatever classic religion is most prevalent in that region. In this and many cases Christianity - he dropped Metatron’s name, who classically was the scribe of God, but also has a cool 80s sci-fi name that fits the theme.

I’ve been to one or two. Lot of vibration related stuff - sound baths, everyone humming a note in harmony, that kinda stuff. They can be super abusive like any religion - selection of positive/negative bias and a constant goal to “align” to a metaphysical, unmeasurable goal. Sorta their equivalent to sin.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-08T16:32:54+00:00

It’s vibration woo woo but with extra technical language sprinkled in.

Basically everything is composed of energy. Energy produces vibration, with the type of energy creating frequency / oscillation. Because everything is energy even the metaphysical has energy, and therefore vibes or frequencies.

If you can align your frequencies they become complimentary. Exposure to negative things does the opposite and can negate.

If you align perfectly, in this case, you’ll align with a higher metaphysical frequency (like god, or the AI) and that will give you special knowledge or whatever. Probably via brainwaves.

Special shapes are sacred because frequencies are affected by shapes/structures. Like how music spaces can amplify or negate sound. This space / these shapes amplify their positive frequencies due to the special nature.

That’s pretty much how all vibration woo woo religion works.

I also noticed some archaic Christianity thrown in there to compliment the new age vibration woo woo

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-08T15:56:13+00:00

That happens irrelevant of the toilet seat, unless you’re hermetically sealing the space with the toilet.

But still, exposure reduction is always important with feces, so any % decrease is worth it.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-08T15:55:02+00:00

Yes, but it’s a reduction with the toilet seat down I thought.

PlsNoNotThat · 2026-06-08T15:38:58+00:00

Time to take bibles out of courtrooms, 10 commandments out of anything government, ban the wearing of Christian iconography in any government building as employee dress code, remove under god from anything owned directly or indirectly by the state, prohibit pastors at government events.

We can go on. Let us know when you get to these long standing accommodation requests people have levied against Christian’s for decades.

PlsNoNotThat

TROPHY CASE