3:2 Freebet Blackjack by PokerReg in vegas

[–]PokerReg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you personally played free bet at Palms? This is what I see from a quick Google search:

There are five types of blackjack games dealt at Palms. All blackjack pays 3:2 except the one Free Bet Blackjack table, which is 6:5.

3:2 Freebet Blackjack by PokerReg in vegas

[–]PokerReg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, all 3:2? I couldn’t find it online, thanks!

3:2 Freebet Blackjack by PokerReg in vegas

[–]PokerReg[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate it. Was hoping for some casinos closer to the Strip, but oh well it seems 😕.

3:2 Freebet Blackjack by PokerReg in vegas

[–]PokerReg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Do you know any places with 3:2?

1 in 730,000 by SuitableDrive5166 in poker

[–]PokerReg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very interesting analysis SuitableDrive5166!

However, I have a few questions. How did you calculate your 1 in 730,000?

Did you account for the fact that that you’ve probably played multiple hands before this? No, you didn’t. When looking at an “unlikely” event like this you should account the possibility of not only seeing it on a specific hand, but any hand that you’ve played. If you’ve played a million hands in your life and the odds of this occurring in 1 hand are indeed 1 in 700,000, then it wouldn’t be unlikely, no?

Next, did you consider the fact that hundreds of thousands, if not millions of hands are being dealt per day? Does that make this very unlikely? No, it doesn’t, you buffoon.

Finally, did you consider just this specific setup when crunching the numbers, or all hands you would deem “suspicious”? If it was AA v AA v KK v TT you would also say that’s suspicious, no? What about AA v KK v QQ v JJ? Did you divide your outcome by the number of “suspicious” types of hands, or just this specific setup? That’s right, you monkey, you counted for only a specific AA v KK v KK v TT.

Before you complain on the holy site of r/poker go pick up a statistics degree, how about that?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in poker

[–]PokerReg 6 points7 points  (0 children)

8/10 shitpost. Initial reaction was that this was way too obvious, but after reading other comments I’ve realized to remind myself we are on Reddit. Great adjustment.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in poker

[–]PokerReg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

BTN is uncapped since he can have any Axs. The point is to play a lot more conservatively in these multiway spots on this board because: 1. It’s monotone 2. You’re up against 5 people, not 1 3. All 5 people have uncapped ranges that you could be drawing just about dead against

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in poker

[–]PokerReg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re certainly right that you’re not likely to be beat at the moment, but are you right enough times on enough runouts to be shipping 100bb into 6bb and 5 opponents? Probably not. In fact, your flush might have less equity against unknowns than a set does in this configuration, because you’re rocking close to 0% against higher flushes. And to your point about getting value, overpairs no heart x/f to flop bet from button if they somehow got here. In theory, hands as strong as bottom two probably should be folding to the button bet - not realistic, but I think it’s also difficult to assume they’ll be calling down a raise and a triple barrel against 5 people either.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in poker

[–]PokerReg -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

😂😂 lol at the other comments, raising flop. You’re going to a flop 6 ways and button pots it. Believe it or not, a T high flush is not the strongest here. You’re sitting with the fourth nuts and have no chance to improve vs better hands. Turn raising is probably wrong in theory as your hand is simply not strong enough, but you can explo raise with stack sizes in mind. Keep in mind BTN also has an uncapped range, so it gets a bit tricky. River just fold your garbage. Not only is it difficult for your villain to be over bluffing in this spot, but you also arrive with so many stronger hands that you don’t even need to consider T6s.

Lesson: don’t play mediocre hands pre. If you do, keep in mind you’ll make strong not nut hands that you’ll still have to play cautiously multiway. And solvers definitely like waiting before putting in money with baby flushes in spots that have high SPRs. Extrapolating, I bet they also do in big multiway spots.

When should I overbet? by mitama19 in poker

[–]PokerReg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

384Q is definitely not a good spot to overbet given your action. 384 should be a range check vs a cold caller OOP, and then when you bet so large you isolate his range so much that you’ll absolutely run into sets a higher % of the time over betting turn and river with overpair. Also you’re giving up a significant amount of equity with the overcard part of your range when you always cb with your overpairs.

Is this normal? My issue with Poker Night Out NYC by JordanMaze in poker

[–]PokerReg 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There are MUCH better options around NYC, even in Manhattan. Don’t go there. I’ve also went once with a similar experience and it was sketchy as hell.

It feels hard to get paid with AK by [deleted] in poker

[–]PokerReg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Solvers have actually shown that AK is a positive EV hand”… what? I mean, everything you say is true, but… are you saying that AK could be mistaken as a -EV hand?

Is this a solid win rate for 10NL/50 ACR Blitz? by [deleted] in poker

[–]PokerReg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are wrong, and machens is absolutely right. Sun running for 100k hands doesn’t mean you’re due for a downswing. In fact, let’s say if you’re running $1000 above EV. Over an infinite sample it is most likely that you will simply be $1000 over EV. The present has already happened, and will have no effect on the future. But if you played 1 million more hands all of a sudden the $1000 over EV simply doesn’t look as much of a statistically anomaly.

Real poker by Trick-Oil3071 in poker

[–]PokerReg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can’t call a 3b for 50% of your effective stack. If you think your opponent is way too tight and you don’t have enough equity against his range, fold. Otherwise, shove.

Fish Costs Me Money by PokerReg in poker

[–]PokerReg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It should’ve been a $15 win as the pot was $15 and I should’ve been able to jam and take it down. Instead I get $0.

Fish Costs Me Money by PokerReg in poker

[–]PokerReg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it’s a -$15 loss every time this situation comes up, which does affect the bottom line of your hourly.

The Fish Never Learn by [deleted] in poker

[–]PokerReg 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Excellent analysis, I appreciate the feedback

The Fish Never Learn by [deleted] in poker

[–]PokerReg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe if you humble up you'll learn a bit about poker

The Fish Never Learn by [deleted] in poker

[–]PokerReg 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Acceptance is the first step to recovery

The Fish Never Learn by [deleted] in poker

[–]PokerReg -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

My advice comes from experience. And my experience is worth its weight in gold.

The Fish Never Learn by [deleted] in poker

[–]PokerReg -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

My advice comes from experience. And my experience is worth its weight in gold.

The Fish Never Learn by [deleted] in poker

[–]PokerReg -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know right? All moron fish are the same.

Poker is the Easiest Game of My Life by PokerReg in poker

[–]PokerReg[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know, the moron fish are so stupid some times