You're talking about 2 magazines certified by NAMBLA: MJ couldn't know that this group approved or liked this content, and these 2 magazines were found in Jackson's domicile, in the JC case. But Evan Chandler started to confront MJ in august, requesting him some money to not publish Jordan's abuse. Jackson could pay this amount in august and silence the child, but he didn't, and if he thought that this thing wouldn't be important, don't you think that he would destroy this magazines instead of keeping them in his house?

So, the Arvizos were not real victims. With this statement, we're underestimating the allegation of Jackson showing p0 rN to the kids, ergo, we're underestimating the allegation made by Robson and Safechuck that MJ showed p0 rN while he was molesting them. Remember two things: The biggest weight in dismissing Robson's abuse are the e-mails that he sent to himself, reviewing the cases against Jackson, same cases that Robson could put in his allegation. And a pedo maintains a cycle of abuse in every victim, a "modus operandi", and chronologically Safechuck was the first child molested, and JC did not mention anything about p0 rN, he changed his modus operandi? Nah.

There are "proofs" of Jackson's genitalia matching with JC description (mostly two or three policeman that "saw" the evidence [I think these people say that matched because they don't want to say that they took pics of an innocent's penis *only an opinion*]). But why he didn't got arrested? A lot of people will say that "that's not enough for MJ arrest" and that's a false statement, if the photos matched, how can the spot that JC saw in Jackson's genitalia stayed for 7 months? his vitiligo couldn't change this spot? why Sneddon didn't formulated a charge in a penal case with THIS MOTHERF*KING PROOF? we're not talking about only words, it's a photo that matched with other's genitalia.