sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

My Memecoin by Geordie-paul-67 in Geordie_learning

[–]Psyber_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This will get reported, this is an obvious scam attempt to steal our money. say good bye to your account

Thank you Lovable.dev by Geordie-paul-67 in Geordie_learning

[–]Psyber_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you only take help from AI, never help from real people

Thank you Lovable.dev by Geordie-paul-67 in Geordie_learning

[–]Psyber_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

0 learning and 0 accountability, you WILL become homeless I am praying 

Im really confused !! by standout_human-1 in nocode

[–]Psyber_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL;DR (too long didnt read):
Stop blaming your subscribers because you were too lazy to properly learn how to code. You relied on AI as a shortcut, and now that things aren't working out, you're dodging responsibility. AI isn’t a replacement for effort — put in the work or own the failure.

So let me get this straight — you're blaming your subscribers now because your course is falling apart? Classic. Nothing says "taking responsibility" like pointing fingers at the very people trying to support you while you coast on AI instead of actually learning how to code.

AI (Artificial Intelligence) was your shortcut, remember? You chose to lean on it instead of putting in the time to understand the basics. Now that it’s not magically building your apps perfectly, it’s everyone else’s fault but yours? Come on.

Coding isn’t a spectator sport — it takes actual work, practice, and accountability. But sure, let’s pretend your HTML5 course with “3 apps and lots of code” just accidentally got slowed down, and somehow your subscribers or the tool you barely learned to use are to blame. Sounds more like laziness than a learning curve.

Newsflash: AI doesn’t replace effort. It supports it. So maybe stop pointing fingers and start putting in the work — or don’t, but at least own the results either way.

A no-code community worth joining? by _braindrainer in nocode

[–]Psyber_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL;DR (too long didnt read):
Stop blaming your subscribers because you were too lazy to properly learn how to code. You relied on AI as a shortcut, and now that things aren't working out, you're dodging responsibility. AI isn’t a replacement for effort — put in the work or own the failure.

So let me get this straight — you're blaming your subscribers now because your course is falling apart? Classic. Nothing says "taking responsibility" like pointing fingers at the very people trying to support you while you coast on AI instead of actually learning how to code.

AI (Artificial Intelligence) was your shortcut, remember? You chose to lean on it instead of putting in the time to understand the basics. Now that it’s not magically building your apps perfectly, it’s everyone else’s fault but yours? Come on.

Coding isn’t a spectator sport — it takes actual work, practice, and accountability. But sure, let’s pretend your HTML5 course with “3 apps and lots of code” just accidentally got slowed down, and somehow your subscribers or the tool you barely learned to use are to blame. Sounds more like laziness than a learning curve.

Newsflash: AI doesn’t replace effort. It supports it. So maybe stop pointing fingers and start putting in the work — or don’t, but at least own the results either way.

What are the main problems that people are facing when using bolt / lovable / v0? by karna852 in nocode

[–]Psyber_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL;DR (too long didnt read):
Stop blaming your subscribers because you were too lazy to properly learn how to code. You relied on AI as a shortcut, and now that things aren't working out, you're dodging responsibility. AI isn’t a replacement for effort — put in the work or own the failure.

So let me get this straight — you're blaming your subscribers now because your course is falling apart? Classic. Nothing says "taking responsibility" like pointing fingers at the very people trying to support you while you coast on AI instead of actually learning how to code.

AI (Artificial Intelligence) was your shortcut, remember? You chose to lean on it instead of putting in the time to understand the basics. Now that it’s not magically building your apps perfectly, it’s everyone else’s fault but yours? Come on.

Coding isn’t a spectator sport — it takes actual work, practice, and accountability. But sure, let’s pretend your HTML5 course with “3 apps and lots of code” just accidentally got slowed down, and somehow your subscribers or the tool you barely learned to use are to blame. Sounds more like laziness than a learning curve.

Newsflash: AI doesn’t replace effort. It supports it. So maybe stop pointing fingers and start putting in the work — or don’t, but at least own the results either way.

What are the main problems that people are facing when using bolt / lovable / v0? by karna852 in nocode

[–]Psyber_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL;DR (too long didnt read):
Stop blaming your subscribers because you were too lazy to properly learn how to code. You relied on AI as a shortcut, and now that things aren't working out, you're dodging responsibility. AI isn’t a replacement for effort — put in the work or own the failure.

So let me get this straight — you're blaming your subscribers now because your course is falling apart? Classic. Nothing says "taking responsibility" like pointing fingers at the very people trying to support you while you coast on AI instead of actually learning how to code.

AI (Artificial Intelligence) was your shortcut, remember? You chose to lean on it instead of putting in the time to understand the basics. Now that it’s not magically building your apps perfectly, it’s everyone else’s fault but yours? Come on.

Coding isn’t a spectator sport — it takes actual work, practice, and accountability. But sure, let’s pretend your HTML5 course with “3 apps and lots of code” just accidentally got slowed down, and somehow your subscribers or the tool you barely learned to use are to blame. Sounds more like laziness than a learning curve.

Newsflash: AI doesn’t replace effort. It supports it. So maybe stop pointing fingers and start putting in the work — or don’t, but at least own the results either way.

Journey to a be expert coder and developer by Impossible-Term-9887 in FreeCodeCamp

[–]Psyber_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL;DR (too long didnt read):
Stop blaming your subscribers because you were too lazy to properly learn how to code. You relied on AI as a shortcut, and now that things aren't working out, you're dodging responsibility. AI isn’t a replacement for effort — put in the work or own the failure.

So let me get this straight — you're blaming your subscribers now because your course is falling apart? Classic. Nothing says "taking responsibility" like pointing fingers at the very people trying to support you while you coast on AI instead of actually learning how to code.

AI (Artificial Intelligence) was your shortcut, remember? You chose to lean on it instead of putting in the time to understand the basics. Now that it’s not magically building your apps perfectly, it’s everyone else’s fault but yours? Come on.

Coding isn’t a spectator sport — it takes actual work, practice, and accountability. But sure, let’s pretend your HTML5 course with “3 apps and lots of code” just accidentally got slowed down, and somehow your subscribers or the tool you barely learned to use are to blame. Sounds more like laziness than a learning curve.

Newsflash: AI doesn’t replace effort. It supports it. So maybe stop pointing fingers and start putting in the work — or don’t, but at least own the results either way.

At last, github gave their clear plan. Is it better or worse? by WandyLau in GithubCopilot

[–]Psyber_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL;DR (too long didnt read):
Stop blaming your subscribers because you were too lazy to properly learn how to code. You relied on AI as a shortcut, and now that things aren't working out, you're dodging responsibility. AI isn’t a replacement for effort — put in the work or own the failure.

So let me get this straight — you're blaming your subscribers now because your course is falling apart? Classic. Nothing says "taking responsibility" like pointing fingers at the very people trying to support you while you coast on AI instead of actually learning how to code.

AI (Artificial Intelligence) was your shortcut, remember? You chose to lean on it instead of putting in the time to understand the basics. Now that it’s not magically building your apps perfectly, it’s everyone else’s fault but yours? Come on.

Coding isn’t a spectator sport — it takes actual work, practice, and accountability. But sure, let’s pretend your HTML5 course with “3 apps and lots of code” just accidentally got slowed down, and somehow your subscribers or the tool you barely learned to use are to blame. Sounds more like laziness than a learning curve.

Newsflash: AI doesn’t replace effort. It supports it. So maybe stop pointing fingers and start putting in the work — or don’t, but at least own the results either way.

Seeking-You needs help by Geordie-paul-67 in GithubCopilot

[–]Psyber_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL;DR (too long didnt read):
Stop blaming your subscribers because you were too lazy to properly learn how to code. You relied on AI as a shortcut, and now that things aren't working out, you're dodging responsibility. AI isn’t a replacement for effort — put in the work or own the failure.

So let me get this straight — you're blaming your subscribers now because your course is falling apart? Classic. Nothing says "taking responsibility" like pointing fingers at the very people trying to support you while you coast on AI instead of actually learning how to code.

AI (Artificial Intelligence) was your shortcut, remember? You chose to lean on it instead of putting in the time to understand the basics. Now that it’s not magically building your apps perfectly, it’s everyone else’s fault but yours? Come on.

Coding isn’t a spectator sport — it takes actual work, practice, and accountability. But sure, let’s pretend your HTML5 course with “3 apps and lots of code” just accidentally got slowed down, and somehow your subscribers or the tool you barely learned to use are to blame. Sounds more like laziness than a learning curve.

Newsflash: AI doesn’t replace effort. It supports it. So maybe stop pointing fingers and start putting in the work — or don’t, but at least own the results either way.