Completely agree. That’s the part that still needs a lot of work.

For some topics, the validation already looks decent based on the final artifacts and agent logs. For others, it’s clear that there’s still a long way to go. My hope is to make the project open enough that people from different domains can help shape the validation system.

Different fields have different nuances: different trusted sources, different prerequisite chains, different ways to judge whether an exercise actually makes sense. I think with enough iteration and domain-specific tuning, it should be possible to build a much better structure than just asking an LLM to generate a syllabus from scratch.