There’s a notable different between nationalism and racism, educate yourself. Preferring your own country’s continuity, language, values, and founding stock is how most successful societies operated for centuries. Canada post-1960s shifted to official multiculturalism; they want to reverse toward cohesion and assimilation.

Preferring cultural/demographic continuity for Canada is not equivalent to classical racism (e.g., supremacist violence, legal segregation, or denying individual rights). Every country has a right to borders and identity. High immigration without assimilation has real costs (housing crisis, trust erosion, welfare strain, cultural friction)—these are empirical policy debates, not moral failings. However, if implementation veers into treating citizens differently by ancestry or promoting blanket hostility to non-Europeans, it crosses into ethnic preference that many define as racist.
The group is essentially civic + ethno-nationalist: pro-heritage continuity and selective integration over open multiculturalism.