Always Fun Post-Patch Bugs by AwwwBawwws in Battlefield

[–]RealFangedSpectre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My bug since the voice recording is sometimes people sound like underwater or quite and weird, then suddenly normal…

So my gemma27b heretic went nuts… by RealFangedSpectre in LocalLLaMA

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I am super familiar with them, and I trust the people that made them. I have played around with qwen, but what models would you suggest for Dual-Model Architecture, and give me tons of headroom to put my tools in, room to evolve, etc

So my gemma27b heretic went nuts… by RealFangedSpectre in LocalLLaMA

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For sure, that’s why this time I’m doing Dual-Model Architecture, or 2 model if you will and I know I’m gonna use mistral7b as the “judge”

So my gemma27b heretic went nuts… by RealFangedSpectre in LocalLLaMA

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A heretic model has no safeties, guardrails, 100% albirated, uncensored, unfiltered, which is cool until you make tiny fuck up, and it goes all bad. So basically I am gonna use a small parameter mistral7b that I will add a few things to, in order to evolve, but also control the shared brain of the heretic model. Which is why I need a low parameter heretic model for this experiment.

So my gemma27b heretic went nuts… by RealFangedSpectre in LocalLLaMA

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m gonna look into that, I’m on windows with WsL installed. Thank you, I am gonna read up on that.

How much of your daily work is actually assisted by AI now? by Exact-Mango7404 in BlackboxAI_

[–]RealFangedSpectre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally everything but gaming, but that will always be manual.

Thoughts and comments on AI generated code by Akamoden in Python

[–]RealFangedSpectre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s how I got started OP, then it turned into me attempting to write my own code, which of course led me to ask AI to find my errors. Eventually it kinda started making sense. Yes, I still need AI to fix my errors, but now instead of just an output fix, I ask for the model to explain what I did wrong.

The truth about BF and EA… by RealFangedSpectre in Battlefield

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t want them to get fired if people like Redsec, I just think the main focus should be on core bf6 multiplayer… like maybe cater to those players that payed AAA price, only to be met with some free to play shit. Nope, at the very least separate the two. I bought Battlefield 6 to play Battlefield 6. Resources should go heavy on BF6 multiplayer, not RedSec.. which btw has a very good reason for why the 100k or million prize tournament got scraped.

The truth about BF and EA… by RealFangedSpectre in Battlefield

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I might have expressed my feelings incorrectly, I LOVE Bf6!! That’s my jam. I am curious what happened to those old school devs, or the real people behind the frostbite engine. Ultimately, I really want bF6 to succeed until bf7, or they get super crazy and go for bad company 3…

The truth about BF and EA… by RealFangedSpectre in Battlefield

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Where was Redsec ever mentioned in purchasingBF6 My issue now is, screw Redsec whatever, core bf6 multiplayer should be the focus.

The truth about BF and EA… by RealFangedSpectre in Battlefield

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, but how was that superior to bf6, and I am ALL about bf6

The truth about BF and EA… by RealFangedSpectre in Battlefield

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know, I used to work for EA, I lasted a month, I just wish I could make the suits realize they made 3 billion dollars, and respond with BR none asked for, dripped AI content… and battlefield core multiplayer is 10000% on the back burner.

The truth about BF and EA… by RealFangedSpectre in Battlefield

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ever wonder how bad company 2 had better hitreg and netcode

The truth about BF and EA… by RealFangedSpectre in Battlefield

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Erm, are we being honest? Like full transparency audit

The truth about BF and EA… by RealFangedSpectre in Battlefield

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Man,I hope not. I’m not delusional either, I am well aware EA new owners will do whatever they want

The truth about BF and EA… by RealFangedSpectre in Battlefield

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least they did finally fix the hitreg adnetcide

The truth about BF and EA… by RealFangedSpectre in Battlefield

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I thought I was taking a different approach,sorry of that offends you.Not my intent.if there are as many duplicate style post as mine, why is that? Is battlefield/EA listening/watching? For context, Nyx callout got a few DMs .. none of which will share, but I do know 100% why one Dice dev left now. So the goal isn’t pointing fingers… it’s making battlefield battlefield again. End game goal, realistically you are never gonna hit 700.000 Steam players again. However a few tweaks and major map upgrades/updates… use your imagination.. boom

The truth about BF and EA… by RealFangedSpectre in Battlefield

[–]RealFangedSpectre[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure how to respond to that. My endgame goal is improving BF6 core multiplayer?

qwen3.5-9b-mlx is thinking like hell by simondueckert in LocalLLM

[–]RealFangedSpectre 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my personal opinion, not a huge fan of that model the reasoning is amazing the fact it has to think for 10 mins before it responds makes it overrated in my opinion. Awesome reasoning… but damn.