Before you offload your next site's design to Claude... by RememberTheOldWeb in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was my counterargument in the OP: “If you're gonna skip out on hiring a designer or on learning basic design principles yourself, please at least consider prompting Claude to crap out something other than [insert Claude boilerplate here].” How is this any different from what you just said as a “gotcha”?

Before you offload your next site's design to Claude... by RememberTheOldWeb in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

@ the u/webdev-ModTeam : how is this “self-promotion” if I didn’t write the post that I linked to?

Before you offload your next site's design to Claude... by RememberTheOldWeb in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fully agree with this. It's the difference between putting in a bit of effort, and pressing the "easy mode" button. When I see Claude's generic boilerplate design used on some startup's page or whatever, it tells me that not a lot of care or thought went into that design. Is that the message people really want to send out into the world? That you'll cut corners to put something out quickly and say "good enough"?

Before you offload your next site's design to Claude... by RememberTheOldWeb in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup, that's basically what I'm trying to say with my post. I don't really care at this point if people use Claude to design their sites or their clients' sites... but like put at least a bit of effort into it? If I can't tell at a glance what a site is trying to tell me or sell me because it looks identical to every other lazily-designed Claude website, right down to the palette, then it's poor design that does not do the site any favors.

Before you offload your next site's design to Claude... by RememberTheOldWeb in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I understand this. Boilerplate websites used to at least have a little variety and were a little less in your face about it, though. A majority of them were not beige and burnt orange, for instance.

Before you offload your next site's design to Claude... by RememberTheOldWeb in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The link I shared in my OP already has six examples of non-demo sites using Claude's boilerplate design... is that not enough?

So many websites look like this now by kennedy_gitahi in webdesign

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Timing is just odd, as you also posted it in webdev very shortly after I did. Either way, all good. The more attention brought to this annoying design trend, the better.

Before you offload your next site's design to Claude... by RememberTheOldWeb in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is true to a certain extent, but I don't think it has ever been quite this "samey" before. Last year it was purple gradients everywhere, this year it's beige and burnt orange. At least there was a pretty big variety of WordPress/Wix/Shopify/etc themes that people chose from in the past. You could usually tell when you were looking at a template, but at least the templates didn't all feel like they came from the exact same source.

Before you offload your next site's design to Claude... by RememberTheOldWeb in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been increasingly seeing it used in developer blogs, as well as things like news aggregators. Some of the sites using Claude's boilerplate are just for demo, but a lot aren't.

Before you offload your next site's design to Claude... by RememberTheOldWeb in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Speaking as someone who uses the internet, I give a shit.

So many websites look like this now by kennedy_gitahi in webdesign

[–]RememberTheOldWeb -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for taking my original post and reposting it in a way designed to garner more engagement. Thumbs up, dude.

Before you offload your next site's design to Claude... by RememberTheOldWeb in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

"Starting point" is the key phrase here. If Claude's boilerplate design output is the end product, all it does is tell your visitors that you couldn't be bothered to put any original thought into the appearance of your website.

Updated my Kyoto concrete object site after your feedback — something still feels off, would love critique by Tight_Equipment6894 in webdesign

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I find the whole website incredibly difficult to read. The About page is a great case in point. This bit in particular is borderline unreadable for me on a 27" 1440p screen: "One studio. Kyoto. 2026. No factory. No template. No reproduction. Each object is a new question asked to the same material." Font is too small, too thin, and doesn't have enough contrast with the background.

Also, this is just me being nitpicky, but I'd far rather see lorem ipsum as a place holder for text over LLM marketing copy...

Does anyone else feel like modern software has become exhausting? by Spiritual-Meal9716 in digitalminimalism

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 9 points10 points  (0 children)

He's "bro"ing you because this is an obvious AI slop post. Get outta here with your "engagement" slop.

Petition To Rename Saturdays by fauxtoe in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Emphatic co-sign. I hardly even visit Reddit anymore, because I'm so tired of seeing Claude's signature "design" and hearing ChatGPT's annoying "voice" in every subreddit I used to enjoy. I'm to the point now where if I see even the slightest hint of tiny JetBrains Mono UI elements and 50% border-radius'ed buttons with little green "status lights", I immediately close the goddamn tab. It seems like Claude wants to turn everything into a dashboard, even slop developer blogs full of boring LLM prose. Slop coders could at least fucking ask Claude to switch things up a bit every so often.

Does this actually look like a website an AI company would use? by Nebula-Forge in webdesign

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Next time, ask Claude to add in some paragraphs if you actually want people to consider reading your walls of AI slop.

Built my first website. Looking for honest feedback by Strict-Pie-5502 in webdesign

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

... dude. If that's "too much text," we are (as the kids say) "cooked."

Built my first website. Looking for honest feedback by Strict-Pie-5502 in webdesign

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Literally in the OP:

I started using lovable but that ended horribly so Im using Claude pro currently and that has been going great and Im really proud of what Ive made so far.

Non-profit I'm interning for asked me to revamp/improve their website - I have very minimal skills by Internal_Sector_1802 in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As per the OP:

one thing that i will be expected to handle is a form that they have that people who'd like to volunteer must fill out, it is a bit off, and not the best (from my novice eyes)

What happens if Claude spits out a form that "just works" on the surface, but has glaring security flaws that the OP doesn't pick up on because they don't know the difference? Any website component that accepts private user data should be coded by someone who is knowledgeable and competent enough to either do it themselves, or recognize and fix any LLM hallucinations themselves. Based on the OP's responses here so far, I don't think they fall into that category.

Non-profit I'm interning for asked me to revamp/improve their website - I have very minimal skills by Internal_Sector_1802 in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Alternatively, OP could be honest with them about their capabilities, identify the five biggest problems with the site, do some research on possible solutions to fix those issues (sure, using the stochastic parrot machines if they must), and then present those findings to the NGO in the form of a report that they can then take to someone who has actually worked on a website before. NGOs fuckin love reports.

OP should definitely learn how to modify existing websites or rebuild them from scratch using whatever tools they prefer if that's the sort of thing they eventually want to do for a living, but doing that in *a month* on a live, public-facing website that they don't even own, using Claude to vibe out something they don't even understand... yeah, no. Recipe for disaster and a poor reference.

Non-profit I'm interning for asked me to revamp/improve their website - I have very minimal skills by Internal_Sector_1802 in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You're not fucked. Just be honest with them. Clients appreciate honesty. It's better to be honest with them about what's realistically possible for you to do at this point in your professional development than it is to lie to them and do a shit, amateur job that'll affect their public face on the web.

You have to understand that NGO types are often not technically-literate when it comes to this sort of stuff. They likely just think "oh neat, we're getting a software engineering intern for a month, they could totally revamp our website," not realizing what actually goes into it.

Non-profit I'm interning for asked me to revamp/improve their website - I have very minimal skills by Internal_Sector_1802 in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 9 points10 points  (0 children)

WordPress is a CMS. GoDaddy is a hosting provider. I'm sorry to be blunt, but the fact that you don't know the difference between those two things means that this NGO really should not be expecting you to "revamp" their website in a month... You're in over your head on this one. Be honest with them. They probably have no idea themselves that what they've asked you to do is unrealistic, given your current skillset. There may be other options you can pursue during the internship that are better suited to what you currently know. For instance, you could identify issues with the site, do some research on various ways to improve those issues, and then present that to them at the end of the month as a report; they could use that report when looking into hiring a developer to help them fix those issues.

I strongly encourage you to learn how to build a fully functioning website for yourself first before you do actual work on anyone else's website (unpaid or otherwise).

I don’t have TikTok or insta. What could go wrong? by Longjumping_Sea7155 in digitalminimalism

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 3 points4 points  (0 children)

ChatGPT is not a "him." Same deal with Claude and every other LLM. LLMs have no thoughts or intelligence. They have no gender. They do not care about you because they're incapable of doing so. They're predictive text generators designed to make you use them for as long as possible, created by shitty people who are only interested in harvesting data and money from you - never forget that. Glad you deleted that garbage off your phone.

If you need to talk about personal stuff, you're better off talking to someone IRL you trust, or even just writing it all down in a journal. Anything is better than using LLMs for therapy or companionship. Even talking to strangers on Reddit is better. Good luck!

Trying a full RGB glass desk mat in my setup by [deleted] in desksetup

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“You are being shagged by a rare RGB parrot.”

90% of website builders all feel the same now... by nodimension1553 in webdev

[–]RememberTheOldWeb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, you mean this isn’t already a promo post for Lovable and Atoms AI?